I'm taking the points ... I've seen Oswieller.. he's had 14-16 weeks or so to show me what he is, I know what I'm getting with him, one of the bottom 3 QBs in the league.. I don't know what I'm getting with a rookie.. I'll take the better coach, better supporting cast, the 3.5 head start, and the unknown QB... by no means slamming a Texans pick, but the QB is horrible, he was benched for TOM SAVAGE... I can't back that hete
Good point
0
Quote Originally Posted by Moonstormsnow:
I'm taking the points ... I've seen Oswieller.. he's had 14-16 weeks or so to show me what he is, I know what I'm getting with him, one of the bottom 3 QBs in the league.. I don't know what I'm getting with a rookie.. I'll take the better coach, better supporting cast, the 3.5 head start, and the unknown QB... by no means slamming a Texans pick, but the QB is horrible, he was benched for TOM SAVAGE... I can't back that hete
I'm on Houston but that's just ridiculous, about to be a father who the hell cares. Same feel good nonsense as smiths last game. Makes no difference if he had 10 or 0 children. Like I said it's called gambling, give me Houston. Also last year that 30-0 shutout was against KC and Brian hoyer was the QB, KC is a very underrated team so I wasn't surprised for that loss and score and hoyer had like what 5 interceptions
Jrod6, best of luck and I am on your Pitts pick.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jrod6:
I'm on Houston but that's just ridiculous, about to be a father who the hell cares. Same feel good nonsense as smiths last game. Makes no difference if he had 10 or 0 children. Like I said it's called gambling, give me Houston. Also last year that 30-0 shutout was against KC and Brian hoyer was the QB, KC is a very underrated team so I wasn't surprised for that loss and score and hoyer had like what 5 interceptions
Last year's game has absolutely nothing to do with this game. Absolutely nothing
While I actually agree with you for the most part....the only thing I would add is Bill Obrien was the coach last year. How did he prepare his team. 30-0. He was also the coach for prime time Thursday night Football this year. He got slammed by Pats versus 3rd stringer who looked like Donavan McNabb in his prime. Monday night Oakland In Mexico City a loser. His only prime time win was Sunday night miracle against Colts when the Colts went in prevent late in the 4th and made Brock look like Peyton.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mathwiz:
Last year's game has absolutely nothing to do with this game. Absolutely nothing
While I actually agree with you for the most part....the only thing I would add is Bill Obrien was the coach last year. How did he prepare his team. 30-0. He was also the coach for prime time Thursday night Football this year. He got slammed by Pats versus 3rd stringer who looked like Donavan McNabb in his prime. Monday night Oakland In Mexico City a loser. His only prime time win was Sunday night miracle against Colts when the Colts went in prevent late in the 4th and made Brock look like Peyton.
OK OK not for nutting we all QB's for texans suck BUT omg this poor kid for raiders never even seen playoffs
I'm not stupid either to go bet my cash on raiders
even tho we all know texans will not be playing at the bowl as all other hosts have lost out most never eveer saw playoffs
but afc south is garbage jokes
Back a stone green rookie in Playoffs on the road???
Fok i seen em lose at home 1st round.
of course niether of these teams will be in the SB, this is a throw away game theres a reason why ESPN is losing 75 million showing this game. still i say HOUSTON pulls through, covers then gets dominated next game
0
Quote Originally Posted by bigamoose:
OK OK not for nutting we all QB's for texans suck BUT omg this poor kid for raiders never even seen playoffs
I'm not stupid either to go bet my cash on raiders
even tho we all know texans will not be playing at the bowl as all other hosts have lost out most never eveer saw playoffs
but afc south is garbage jokes
Back a stone green rookie in Playoffs on the road???
Fok i seen em lose at home 1st round.
of course niether of these teams will be in the SB, this is a throw away game theres a reason why ESPN is losing 75 million showing this game. still i say HOUSTON pulls through, covers then gets dominated next game
Jrod6, you are looking good here...still way early but all signs point to the Houstons. The Oaklands look like they have their bags packed for Monte Carlo.
0
Jrod6, you are looking good here...still way early but all signs point to the Houstons. The Oaklands look like they have their bags packed for Monte Carlo.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.