All Forums | NFL Betting

Arizona Cardinals @ Rams Analysis

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 14155
Posts: 82
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 164
Posted: #26
O.K SORRY GOTTA ADMIT IM ON ZONA & MAY THE BEST TEAM WIN!!!!!!
WISH THE REPLACEMENT REF. WAS HERE....lol..
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2012
Posts: 202
Posted: #27
I am a cardinals homer and feel like I know this team better than anyone. It was a huge loss for them not having Dockett last week but have a feeling he will play this week. Most cards games are close and personally think this game comes down to a fg one way or another. I would personally tease the Rams and under.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1446
Posted: #28
Rams beaten Skins & Seahawks = 2 Black Rookie QB on the road & laid points.  The last time I check Kolb or Skelton are not Rookie QB & not black.  

Arizona will be played "small".  Thursday Night = Road Under (3-1).

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 744
Posted: #29
With Posts like these. I LOVE taking the cards!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by MNFTheory:

Rams beaten Skins & Seahawks = 2 Black Rookie QB on the road & laid points.  The last time I check Kolb or Skelton are not Rookie QB & not black.  

Arizona will be played "small".  Thursday Night = Road Under (3-1).



Wow really, basing your play due to the race of the QB, just sad
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #31
Quote Originally Posted by yogohama:

With Posts like these. I LOVE taking the cards!


go ahead. may the best pick win sir
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #32
I'm not bashing you if you take they Cardinals btw , I dont care really, just trying to give some insight here. I think Cardinals are a lot of hype. We will see tonight. GL!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by 12DIE4:

O.K SORRY GOTTA ADMIT IM ON ZONA & MAY THE BEST TEAM WIN!!!!!!
WISH THE REPLACEMENT REF. WAS HERE....lol..


GL man, one of us will make $$ lol
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 902
Posted: #34
Quote Originally Posted by Bonshizzle:

They to Chicago on the final drive?  Then a lucky win against the redskins!  Lost to Detriot who obviously are weak this season!  Seattle win to me was more situational, I didn't watch the game but was gonna play Seattle!  But considered the fact they had a rough week!

Did someone say situational?! Arizona traveling on an extremely short week after an OT game at home.... 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 4475
Posted: #35
great write up sir
already have Rams ML laid but reassured now after this read
much respect to you
BOL on whatever you play

Gotta go pee!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 302
Posted: #36

I'm a Rams fan, but a very critical one at that.  I've bashed them in years past for obvious reasons.  But once we inked Fisher as our new coach,  things started to turn around immediately.  First off, our past few coaches have had 0 experience running an NFL team.  Linehan, Spags, Joe Vitt while Martz was hospitalized, and Martz.  Fisher has been here.  He knows what it takes.  Our secondary is top 5 with Finnegan and Jenkins.  QB's have the lowest rating when throwing at Finnegan in the entire NFC.  Our problem is not getting into the end zone.  Zuerline has a leg that is second to none in my opinion if we get into opposing territory we can almost always chalk it up as 3 points barring turnovers.  Our defense is the "bend but don't break" mentality.  We make plays when they need to be made.  It gets pretty damn loud in the dome which can be credited for a few false starts a game.  Cardinals aren't a great team by any means and in most coin flip games I take the home team.  Not gonna bet on either side but will take the under as I see both offenses struggling to score touchdowns and will instead settle for FGs.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 105
Posted: #37
Let's look at this realistically, shall we?  You obviously don't like the Cards as you have left out some glaring details.

Arizona finished the season 7-2 last year - this is not an 8-8 or 9-7 team.  Team's that finish extremely strong and miss the playoffs typically are the sleepers of the following year.  This team is no fluke.

They have been playing with two new tackles and the line is starting to come together, but it has taken a while.  I think the Wells injury was a blessing, as wow - that Ryan Williams can run.  Now that Kolb is playing better (9th best passer rating in the NFL), Williams is starting and the line is gelling, this offense is coming into their own. St. Louis run D is average at best, Williams goes off tonight and Kolb hits Fitzgerald with some nice play action passes (who you going to side with - Cortland Finnigan or Larry Fitzgerald?)

Defensively, Patrick Peterson is a monster - maybe best cover corner in the NFL.  This allows the Card's to play a more aggressive style D and they have.  The Rams O-Line is a big weakness - the Bears destroyed the Rams and the Cards D is quite close to the Bears.  Bradford will be getting beat up all night - which will lead to mistakes and turnovers.

Last week - well it surprised me with Miami.  But their O-Line did a great job and Tannehill might end up being the best of the rookie QB's this year (helps that he knew the offense coming in).

You are correct, the Rams could have won in Detroit (who has proven to not be that good).  However, you neglect to mention that they should have lost that Washington game - that stupid 15 yard penalty at the end of the game moved the Redskins out of range.  And, the Rams have beaten two rookie QB's....

Field position will be a key in this game and with the three and outs setting up Peterson for returns, well this is a huge edge for the Cardinals and in a defensive struggle, field position means everything.

Hey - I won $$ on the Rams 2 wins and the Detroit game....and lost when I thought they would cover the 9.5 in Chicago so I have been following them.  I also have been on the Cards as well (and lost last week).  The Cards are a good team and St. Louis is a year away, in my opinion (oh, and the Cards have won 7 straight in St. Louis).

I wish everyone the best of luck whichever side you fall onto.....personally, I am on the Cards -1 tonight....

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 10
Posted: #38
You have opend up a hole here and I am about  to jump in it  Thanks JFOX
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #39
Quote Originally Posted by tommy997:

Let's look at this realistically, shall we?  You obviously don't like the Cards as you have left out some glaring details.

Arizona finished the season 7-2 last year - this is not an 8-8 or 9-7 team.  Team's that finish extremely strong and miss the playoffs typically are the sleepers of the following year.  This team is no fluke.

They have been playing with two new tackles and the line is starting to come together, but it has taken a while.  I think the Wells injury was a blessing, as wow - that Ryan Williams can run.  Now that Kolb is playing better (9th best passer rating in the NFL), Williams is starting and the line is gelling, this offense is coming into their own. St. Louis run D is average at best, Williams goes off tonight and Kolb hits Fitzgerald with some nice play action passes (who you going to side with - Cortland Finnigan or Larry Fitzgerald?)

Defensively, Patrick Peterson is a monster - maybe best cover corner in the NFL.  This allows the Card's to play a more aggressive style D and they have.  The Rams O-Line is a big weakness - the Bears destroyed the Rams and the Cards D is quite close to the Bears.  Bradford will be getting beat up all night - which will lead to mistakes and turnovers.

Last week - well it surprised me with Miami.  But their O-Line did a great job and Tannehill might end up being the best of the rookie QB's this year (helps that he knew the offense coming in).

You are correct, the Rams could have won in Detroit (who has proven to not be that good).  However, you neglect to mention that they should have lost that Washington game - that stupid 15 yard penalty at the end of the game moved the Redskins out of range.  And, the Rams have beaten two rookie QB's....

Field position will be a key in this game and with the three and outs setting up Peterson for returns, well this is a huge edge for the Cardinals and in a defensive struggle, field position means everything.

Hey - I won $$ on the Rams 2 wins and the Detroit game....and lost when I thought they would cover the 9.5 in Chicago so I have been following them.  I also have been on the Cards as well (and lost last week).  The Cards are a good team and St. Louis is a year away, in my opinion (oh, and the Cards have won 7 straight in St. Louis).

I wish everyone the best of luck whichever side you fall onto.....personally, I am on the Cards -1 tonight....



I read the first sentence and knew you had the cards. lol Good luck man!! I might lock in Rams soon as the line in my book is at +2.5, so buying to 3 won't be too much. I'm going to wait a little longer and hopefully it gets to 3, or i get a better price at 3. We may both be winners in that case, although i have the Rams winning SU.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2006
Posts: 105
Posted: #40
Would love to meet you in the middle!

And also not to happy with the ass whooping your Raiders put on my Steelers......hahaha....
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by tommy997:

Would love to meet you in the middle!

And also not to happy with the ass whooping your Raiders put on my Steelers......hahaha....


hardly an ass whooping, but ill take it, might be the only win this year =/
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 19113
Posted: #42

I'm with ya.  

Good luck to all !

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 770
Posted: #43
RAMS +2.5  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #44
Quote Originally Posted by Efini:

RAMS +2.5  


half a point to go
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2004
Posts: 1352
Posted: #45
Enjoyed this thanks, Philly and Vick looked inept but the CARDS "D" smashed them in the mouth, very physical. Can they bring that to St. Louis? Kolb still a big ? for me, despite 4th & Game "W" last week. Can the former Cards beat the current Cards? I went stupid and played a 3 team tease RAMS +7, under 45.5 and USC/UTAH over 42.5, should at least be some entertainment. BOL
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 2483
Posted: #46
Quote Originally Posted by alloy145:

Enjoyed this thanks, Philly and Vick looked inept but the CARDS "D" smashed them in the mouth, very physical. Can they bring that to St. Louis? Kolb still a big ? for me, despite 4th & Game "W" last week. Can the former Cards beat the current Cards? I went stupid and played a 3 team tease RAMS +7, under 45.5 and USC/UTAH over 42.5, should at least be some entertainment. BOL


GL MAN! hope it hits!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 348
Posted: #47
I think i'm going to lock in rams ML +110 for 2 units. Maybe another parlay rams & under for 1.

BOL

Great write up man. Keep up with the analysis.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1632
Posted: #48
Over is the play any time ypu can get a game in primetime that is suppose to be close and under 40 points take it and run.  This game reminds me of the Cowboys and Chi it didn't look good early but the over came in and i see this one playing out the same
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 619
Posted: #49
FITTZGERALD    FITZGERALD   FITZGERALD

and more FITZGERALD.
 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 5945
Posted: #50
People are over thinking it, It's the Rams
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright � 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.