All Forums | NFL Betting

........Arizona vs San Diego Super Bowl......

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4625
Posts: 75
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 33531
Posted: #51
I would love to see the chargers go to the superbowl, i dont think zona has the D this year, but they def have the firepower on O to play with any team in the NFC
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2007
Posts: 1937
Posted: #52
NO WAY ARI GET THERE
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1179
Posted: #53
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

 

Thanks for nothing. You forgot the IMO part . Guy could have easily won all 3 SB he played in (lost by a fg to NE and by 4 to Pitt)....8-3 all time in the post season. Best passer rating all time (i think he passed Starr).....Im pretty sure the list of qbs that have played in 3 super bowls is pretty short....

Also didnt start his career till most guys already had a few years in the nfl under their belt.

U can have Montana or Brady or Favre...

Gimme Warner all day and twice on sundays

Your statement tells me your not about winning and more about statistics.  You have your stats and I'll take Montana with 4 Superbowl rings...  The last time I checked that's why you play the game.

 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1179
Posted: #54

Let me guess, you use that same analogy in betting..  I could've won that game if the guy wouldn't done -------.  it's about winning.  Nobody cares how you do it....Just do it!!!

I get everyone is entitled to their opinion so GL

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 517
Posted: #55
Zona? leave it to the fuck that started this thread to come up with this retarded statement.....sorry to disappoint you train but like most of the bullshit you write your fucking wrong again, zona is going to get bounced hard on sat, I doubt NO will overlook them like GB did, would expect just a tad more defense in this one as well....zona wins one playoff game and your blowing your load saying they're going to win the supberbowl...some things never change as in your brains are in your ass as they always have been!!
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #56
Quote Originally Posted by Buckster33:

Your statement tells me your not about winning and more about statistics.  You have your stats and I'll take Montana with 4 Superbowl rings...  The last time I checked that's why you play the game.



Thanks for the info. Montana would have ZERO rings if he played in this decade
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by ezcomeezgo:

Zona? leave it to the fuck that started this thread to come up with this retarded statement.....sorry to disappoint you train but like most of the bullshit you write your fucking wrong again, zona is going to get bounced hard on sat, I doubt NO will overlook them like GB did, would expect just a tad more defense in this one as well....zona wins one playoff game and your blowing your load saying they're going to win the supberbowl...some things never change as in your brains are in your ass as they always have been!!


GB didnt overlook AZ, AZ almost overlooked GB....

Yep, just like I did last year and was wrong by one lucky ass 100 int return for a td...aint that a bitch

Good luck living with you mom and smoking weed...at least your boyfriend likes small cocks
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1179
Posted: #58

Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:



Thanks for the info. Montana would have ZERO rings if he played in this decade

You are really an idiot....Let me guess another individual that wasn't good enough to play sports so you hide behind a keyboard having all the answers..Oh, before you come back I played college ball.

Your thread is a waste of my breath..

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 3142
Posted: #59
BET ID=304188230
01/02/10 03:24 ET
Result: Pending
Possible 2010 Superbowl Matchups - All Bets Action
01/26/10(13:00 ET)
+1800
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 3142
Posted: #60
Don't know why that didn't copy but that is san diego vs dallas
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #61
Quote Originally Posted by Buckster33:

You are really an idiot....Let me guess another individual that wasn't good enough to play sports so you hide behind a keyboard having all the answers..Oh, before you come back I played college ball.

Your thread is a waste of my breath..

By "all the answers" do you mean predicting the SB matchup??

How is it a waste of your breath if you arent talking to me?

Great. I m glad you played college ball. Were any of the girls on your softball team hot?

I WIN!!!

Suck it!!!

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 20650
Posted: #62
Quote Originally Posted by heeeeeh:

Cardinals have ZERO chance to make the superbowl, let alone win it. They are one dimensional. Cards done next weekend.

Arizona


Wouldn't it be safer to say that you would have ZERO chance of even being a player in the NFL.  Where as Arizona at least has the chance to prove you wrong in that there playing the game. That's just a completely stupid statement.
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 1179
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:

By "all the answers" do you mean predicting the SB matchup??

How is it a waste of your breath if you arent talking to me?

Great. I m glad you played college ball. Were any of the girls on your softball team hot?

I WIN!!!

Suck it!!!

 

When you get up +60 units for the year you give me a call. 

 

What are you a person?  You would want me to suck it..

Don't you hate paying your bookie?  What would you do with 18K in your pocket...I guess I got the last laugh..

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #64
Quote Originally Posted by Buckster33:

 

When you get up +60 units for the year you give me a call. 

 

What are you a person?  You would want me to suck it..

Don't you hate paying your bookie?  What would you do with 18K in your pocket...I guess I got the last laugh..

 

I wanted you to suck a metaphorical dick. Get an education.

Why just 60 units? Why would i ever need 18k in my pocket? Like your bookie is gonna pay you all at once. Get a life dude. I'm sure you bet $20 a game and play 6 team parlays all the time.

Good luck. Hope your life doesnt suck as bad in the future.

Piss off

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 12061
Posted: #65
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 3843
Posted: #66
I Was Thinking Dallas/SD  Superbowl...But I Love Warner..Saints D is much weaker than GB  who had #2 D in Playoffs..Jets are #1 I think...I Love Cards +7 and ML and Dallas +3 and ML and SD -7 and Leaning Colts... But Ravens D and Run game Impress me.  Good Luck.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by phillyfranko:

I Was Thinking Dallas/SD  Superbowl...But I Love Warner..Saints D is much weaker than GB  who had #2 D in Playoffs..Jets are #1 I think...I Love Cards +7 and ML and Dallas +3 and ML and SD -7 and Leaning Colts... But Ravens D and Run game Impress me.  Good Luck.


That Colts game is gonna be a good one.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #68
Lol knew I would see this thread from you Train, and KNEW the Cardinals would be in your pick. I know you still have a soft spot for them for what they did for your 50-1 superbowl pick last year that was the talk of the forum.

 

Anyways, you also said the Tigers Cardinals would be the world series matchup so....

JK bro, GL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:

Lol knew I would see this thread from you Train, and KNEW the Cardinals would be in your pick. I know you still have a soft spot for them for what they did for your 50-1 superbowl pick last year that was the talk of the forum.

 

Anyways, you also said the Tigers Cardinals would be the world series matchup so....

JK bro, GL


  . Very true my friend

BUT, that WS prediction was before the playoffs in all fairness
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 17830
Posted: #70
Quote Originally Posted by TRAIN69:



  . Very true my friend

BUT, that WS prediction was before the playoffs in all fairness


Haha ya I know you made it a couple days before the playoffs. It was funny though how one team didn't make the playoffs, and the other got swept in the first round.

I had a ton on the Cards in the first round and I have made worse predictions before (as tough as that is to believe)
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #71

Quote Originally Posted by rangerz2478:



Haha ya I know you made it a couple days before the playoffs. It was funny though how one team didn't make the playoffs, and the other got swept in the first round.

I had a ton on the Cards in the first round and I have made worse predictions before (as tough as that is to believe)

  

 No way!!

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #72
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2002
Posts: 54525
Posted: #73
hightower td
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1956
Posted: #74
guess this thread died
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2009
Posts: 2067
Posted: #75
oops
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.