I believe Dallas qualifies as a fade this week after two large blowouts. Does anyone have the exact rule?
@gooch72
The Exact Rule:
"The Double Blowout System is in effect when an NFL team has scored 30 or more points in two straight games while holding each of those two opponents to 10 points or less. It doesn’t matter if a bye week is involved. NFL teams have shown over many years that when they dominate to this extent on both sides of the ball for two games in a row, they have little left for their next opponent."
@gooch72
The Exact Rule:
"The Double Blowout System is in effect when an NFL team has scored 30 or more points in two straight games while holding each of those two opponents to 10 points or less. It doesn’t matter if a bye week is involved. NFL teams have shown over many years that when they dominate to this extent on both sides of the ball for two games in a row, they have little left for their next opponent."
I came into covers to see if anyone else was aware of this too. I was curious if anyone has tracked the bator rule over the years. This game does qualify but it seems crazy to fade dallas. Hoping the line rises.
I came into covers to see if anyone else was aware of this too. I was curious if anyone has tracked the bator rule over the years. This game does qualify but it seems crazy to fade dallas. Hoping the line rises.
Curious of the percentages on this too. It’s got to be one of the most successful systems out there. Crazy how last games score was exactly 30-10 too
Curious of the percentages on this too. It’s got to be one of the most successful systems out there. Crazy how last games score was exactly 30-10 too
I have the results thru 11/26/21:
"teams that have scored 30 or more points two games straight and kept their opponents to 10 points or less in those two games are 11-34 ATS in their following game. A solid 75.6% going against that team."
I have the results thru 11/26/21:
"teams that have scored 30 or more points two games straight and kept their opponents to 10 points or less in those two games are 11-34 ATS in their following game. A solid 75.6% going against that team."
it was as high as -13 as of yesterday, bet back down to -12 at DK but I still see some 12.5s
you'd have to think it should push back up later in week
it was as high as -13 as of yesterday, bet back down to -12 at DK but I still see some 12.5s
you'd have to think it should push back up later in week
that's a good one coming from you.
that's a good one coming from you.
Let's forget trends and systems for a moment and take a look at the teams for a sec...
Arizona isn't looking as bad as people thought it would. They would love to show the Cowboys some pain.
Also, APARENTLY the line is design to make Arizona the ATS winner this week. It's too damn high (as that meme).
BUT
what can Joshua Dobbs(arizona QB) do against the Dallas defense?
week one he had against Washington passing rating of 78.8, 132 yards and 0 TD
week two against the Giants, passing rating of 99.9, 228 yards and 1 TD
Arizona will have to run the ball, against the Dallas Defense that is number 8 in the NFL against the run, and basically number 1 overall.
but
Let's say the Battor Rule works, and Dallas only manage to score between 15 to 21 points.
Can their defense hold Arizona to 15 to 20 points?
My answer is YES, and then Arizona would cover this huge spread.
But last question, would you put your money on arizona against Dallas in this scenario?
Let's forget trends and systems for a moment and take a look at the teams for a sec...
Arizona isn't looking as bad as people thought it would. They would love to show the Cowboys some pain.
Also, APARENTLY the line is design to make Arizona the ATS winner this week. It's too damn high (as that meme).
BUT
what can Joshua Dobbs(arizona QB) do against the Dallas defense?
week one he had against Washington passing rating of 78.8, 132 yards and 0 TD
week two against the Giants, passing rating of 99.9, 228 yards and 1 TD
Arizona will have to run the ball, against the Dallas Defense that is number 8 in the NFL against the run, and basically number 1 overall.
but
Let's say the Battor Rule works, and Dallas only manage to score between 15 to 21 points.
Can their defense hold Arizona to 15 to 20 points?
My answer is YES, and then Arizona would cover this huge spread.
But last question, would you put your money on arizona against Dallas in this scenario?
@North-Japan
With Bator system, yes I am putting my money on them. You have to have a short memory with nfl. Good teams usually don’t play great 100% of their games.
@North-Japan
With Bator system, yes I am putting my money on them. You have to have a short memory with nfl. Good teams usually don’t play great 100% of their games.
I’ve heard of something similar but not sure about the exact details.
I’ve heard of something similar but not sure about the exact details.
Just came across this post. I recently created a thread asking this similar question but got put in the penalty box I think… weird.
my post paging Mr B doesn’t show up unless you search for it.
Just came across this post. I recently created a thread asking this similar question but got put in the penalty box I think… weird.
my post paging Mr B doesn’t show up unless you search for it.
the fact that Bator hasn't chimed in as of yet makes me think he's not fond of this particular game. I'm sure he knew of this potential scenario playing out immediately after the Jets MNF over Buffalo with Rodgers going down.
Arizona will definitely lose by double digits but will it be 13 or more is the question.
the fact that Bator hasn't chimed in as of yet makes me think he's not fond of this particular game. I'm sure he knew of this potential scenario playing out immediately after the Jets MNF over Buffalo with Rodgers going down.
Arizona will definitely lose by double digits but will it be 13 or more is the question.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.