All Forums | NFL Betting

Big Upset Potential for week 4.......

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 8766
Posts: 94
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 38798
Posted: #1
Rams +8.5, +9, +9.5 + 10

Rams ML +330

book it
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 4375
Posted: #2
They are a really bad football team... I don't think I can touch another one of their games this season. They burned me bad last week.

GL
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2003
Posts: 38798
Posted: #3
Rams opponents this season are a combined 6-3, opposite numbers for the bills.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 4375
Posted: #4
True, but...

St. Louis ranks last in defense and second-to-last in offense. The Rams have been outscored, 116-29, in going 0-3. They are losing by an average of 29 points.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 66896
Posted: #5
The Bills got their scare last week...
 
Buffalo will Roll the Rams
 
BOL either way
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 3472
Posted: #6
The Rams look like a totally unmotivated team. Bulger could care less if the team loses on a weekly basis. I realize the team lacks talent but their issues are deeper than just talent. The wrong coach on the wrong team is going to get fired 1st this season... Linehan must go.

As for betting purposes... I agree with DoubleUp, Bills will be focused in week 4.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1845
Posted: #7
I like KC.  The sharp money has already pounded the line down 2 points and Denver can not stop anyone.  Division rival on the road for the Broncos and a team that really shouldn't be 3-0.  I can see an upset.  Staying away from them in my survivor pool for this reason.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2008
Posts: 12813
Posted: #8
Love Rams in this situation, wj,
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 30979
Posted: #9
 Good luck Jeremy but i cant go past the Bills here,betting on bad teams in sport and hoping they fluke a good perfromance is never a good idea IMO
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2008
Posts: 907
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by wjeremy97:

Rams opponents this season are a combined 6-3, opposite numbers for the bills.

While I'm willing to agree that the Rams opponents (Philly, NYG and Seattle) have been tougher than Buffalo's (Seattle, Jax and Oakland) I think this is a pretty silly way to prove it.

Part of what is making St. Louis' opponents (6-3) looks so good is St. Louis' 3 losses to them. Similarily, part of what is making Buffalo's opponents look bad (3-6) is Buffalo's 3 wins against them.

Hypothetically, if St. Louis played Seattle 20 straight times to start the season, losing every time, would you be able to say that St. Louis had played an incredibly hard schedule because their opponent's record was 20-0? No, because all the wins have come against St. Louis. In this example, other than the fact that Seattle is better than St. Louis, we really have no idea how good Seattle is. They could be the 2nd worst team in the league.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2008
Posts: 988
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by redskinsnut:

I like KC.  The sharp money has already pounded the line down 2 points and Denver can not stop anyone.  Division rival on the road for the Broncos and a team that really shouldn't be 3-0.  I can see an upset.  Staying away from them in my survivor pool for this reason.

 

are you serious , the atlanta falcons and raiders demolished chiefs by a total of 40 .. u dont think the broncos can beat them by a TD anf a FG with the new randy moss cullpepper combo [ cutler , marshall ] .. i sugggest you re-evaluate this

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 52
Posted: #12
when are people going to realize that this team is laying down until Linehan is axed? every week has been a good situation for the Rams to win
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 18794
Posted: #13
It's probably a good bet but tough to tough to back the Tiajuana Rams. 
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 4375
Posted: #14
Marc Bulger got benched... Trent Green will be starting
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 55
Posted: #15
I don't think so.
 
Buffalo will win this one with ease.
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 18970
Posted: #16
hey jeremy i think u may heve something here i can seee rams winning this one steven jacson is gona have a huge game sooner than later and why not against bills , bills are ok team but they are not powerhouse they can beat anybody but they can loose to anybody alsoo i will take up on this goood luck jeremy goood to see u posting in nfl forum again
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2007
Posts: 22305
Posted: #17

Fans and reporters are have clamored for change. St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist Bernie Miklasz today called the current Rams squad the worst in team history:

"They're lifeless, helpless, hopeless. Instead of being listed as underdogs each Sunday, just mark them down as "DOA." This is the worst team in the history of NFL football in St. Louis"

 

 

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 18970
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by Greyhound:

Fans and reporters are have clamored for change. St. Louis Post-Dispatch columnist Bernie Miklasz today called the current Rams squad the worst in team history:

"They're lifeless, helpless, hopeless. Instead of being listed as underdogs each Sunday, just mark them down as "DOA." This is the worst team in the history of NFL football in St. Louis"

 

 

that gives me more reason to take them belive it or not
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2007
Posts: 165
Posted: #19
not a terrible pick
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 5705
Posted: #20
nuggets fans that chick in your avatar is fing smoking, if you know her please send her to this address right now......3674 morning wood ln dallas, tx 11111. thanks..
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2041
Posted: #21
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 445
Posted: #22
It can either be St Lou or KC or maybe Houston even.
I'd say KC.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 229
Posted: #23
I believe in the rams week 4 also
but not KC

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 1845
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by hotsauce61488:

 

are you serious , the atlanta falcons and raiders demolished chiefs by a total of 40 .. u dont think the broncos can beat them by a TD anf a FG with the new randy moss cullpepper combo [ cutler , marshall ] .. i sugggest you re-evaluate this


If it were that easy then we would all be rich.  Betting on bad teams historically is profitable.
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50624
Posted: #25
The Buffalo Bills were all hyped up last week as if they were something special but we were all misled.  They're just another middling NFL team with no clue how to handle the role of big favorite.
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2025 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.