If this isn't a definition of a trap game, I don't know what is....
"This will be biggest NFL decision of the weekend, as 80 percent of cash is on San Francisco and 59 percent of cash is on the Under," says Mike Perry of Sportsbook.ag."
80% of the $$ is on SF and the line has moved from SF -2.5 to PK? I'm taking Carolina.
If this isn't a definition of a trap game, I don't know what is....
"This will be biggest NFL decision of the weekend, as 80 percent of cash is on San Francisco and 59 percent of cash is on the Under," says Mike Perry of Sportsbook.ag."
80% of the $$ is on SF and the line has moved from SF -2.5 to PK? I'm taking Carolina.
LOL! they moved it from SF -2.5 to PK to entice Carolina bettors? Really? Hey, maybe they could make it Carolina -3 and they'd really entice Carolina bettors!!
Changing the line from SF -2.5 to 0 means the Carolina ML goes from +130 to -110.
Early Carolina bettors would bet SF just to try to middle. So you'd get even more SF action.
What's the conspiracy? Bookies are telling you 80% of the money is on SF. And they haven't moved the line. Last week, the same books moved the line from Indy -2.5 to KC -2.5. For this game they moved it SF -2.5 to PK even though 80% of the $$ is on SF.
What's the conspiracy? Bookies are telling you 80% of the money is on SF. And they haven't moved the line. Last week, the same books moved the line from Indy -2.5 to KC -2.5. For this game they moved it SF -2.5 to PK even though 80% of the $$ is on SF.
It is a fact that they don't mind needing Carolina. Whether it works out for them or not is another story but those guys are not stupid.
What's the conspiracy? Bookies are telling you 80% of the money is on SF.
The conspiracy is that money wins football games. It can be 100%, but the books do lose games for crying out loud. Hell....they lose seasons, such as 2005, when they lost money for the entire year.
See you after the game.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
