People are so blinded by that week 12 game its comical....
Do teams never make adjustments after a loss? Never make adjustments playing a team a 2nd time? That week 12 game has NOTHING to do with this weeks game...
Gb has 1 Wr, who completely changed their entire offense....he was hurt in that game. Yes, he played but he wasnt actually healthy until about week 15. He was basically a decoy and SF knew it.
GB's D has been a monster since then allowing over 14 twice and nobody scored more than 24....they are the definition of bend but dont break....they will let you go down the field but force you to kick field-goals.
Their best lineman got hurt in the first quarter....
I can go on and on....
A week 12 matchup has nothing to do with a Conf final games....and its comical to see all the "Does GB even have a chance threads"....
You dont even need the points in this game, take the 7.5 or 8 if you want....but GB wins this game by 2 scores!!!
2
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
People are so blinded by that week 12 game its comical....
Do teams never make adjustments after a loss? Never make adjustments playing a team a 2nd time? That week 12 game has NOTHING to do with this weeks game...
Gb has 1 Wr, who completely changed their entire offense....he was hurt in that game. Yes, he played but he wasnt actually healthy until about week 15. He was basically a decoy and SF knew it.
GB's D has been a monster since then allowing over 14 twice and nobody scored more than 24....they are the definition of bend but dont break....they will let you go down the field but force you to kick field-goals.
Their best lineman got hurt in the first quarter....
I can go on and on....
A week 12 matchup has nothing to do with a Conf final games....and its comical to see all the "Does GB even have a chance threads"....
You dont even need the points in this game, take the 7.5 or 8 if you want....but GB wins this game by 2 scores!!!
I would be extremely shocked even in a nail biter if Green Bay Packers won SU... I’m actually shocked that you think Green Bay is capable with that offense..let alone the rookie coaching game planning thats been going on this season.. against a San Francisco 49ers Dline alone.. Greenbay defense is young and will learn it takes a little more than what they have to cover a “mediocre offense” which in my eyes has playmakers they can’t cover especially Kittle.. but I wish you good luck..since I’ve only placed a wager on the over.. I see 17-20 points from Green Bay Tops... I’m still shocked at everyone doubting this years San Francisco 49ers team this is not the same team..they’ve proven to win in every which way against top competition..mind blowing...
Winning isn’t everything.. It’s the Only thing.
4
I would be extremely shocked even in a nail biter if Green Bay Packers won SU... I’m actually shocked that you think Green Bay is capable with that offense..let alone the rookie coaching game planning thats been going on this season.. against a San Francisco 49ers Dline alone.. Greenbay defense is young and will learn it takes a little more than what they have to cover a “mediocre offense” which in my eyes has playmakers they can’t cover especially Kittle.. but I wish you good luck..since I’ve only placed a wager on the over.. I see 17-20 points from Green Bay Tops... I’m still shocked at everyone doubting this years San Francisco 49ers team this is not the same team..they’ve proven to win in every which way against top competition..mind blowing...
During the Rams week 16 game, there was talk that if SF lost that game they were gonna miss the playoffs, then were a week 17 loss away from the #5 seed....now all of a sudden they are the best team the NFL has ever seen
If just never seen some much bias on a Conf Finals games based on a mid-season game with completely different teams taking the field
1
During the Rams week 16 game, there was talk that if SF lost that game they were gonna miss the playoffs, then were a week 17 loss away from the #5 seed....now all of a sudden they are the best team the NFL has ever seen
If just never seen some much bias on a Conf Finals games based on a mid-season game with completely different teams taking the field
There is always the possibility, the probability seems low though---I figure SF would have to give up some turnovers and be flat, GB would have to play better than they are for that to happen....and I doubt it will.
0
There is always the possibility, the probability seems low though---I figure SF would have to give up some turnovers and be flat, GB would have to play better than they are for that to happen....and I doubt it will.
People are so blinded by that week 12 game its comical....
Do teams never make adjustments after a loss? Never make adjustments playing a team a 2nd time? That week 12 game has NOTHING to do with this weeks game...
Gb has 1 Wr, who completely changed their entire offense....he was hurt in that game. Yes, he played but he wasnt actually healthy until about week 15. He was basically a decoy and SF knew it.
GB's D has been a monster since then allowing over 14 twice and nobody scored more than 24....they are the definition of bend but dont break....they will let you go down the field but force you to kick field-goals.
Their best lineman got hurt in the first quarter....
I can go on and on....
A week 12 matchup has nothing to do with a Conf final games....and its comical to see all the "Does GB even have a chance threads"....
You dont even need the points in this game, take the 7.5 or 8 if you want....but GB wins this game by 2 scores!!!
This is actually spot on.
1
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
People are so blinded by that week 12 game its comical....
Do teams never make adjustments after a loss? Never make adjustments playing a team a 2nd time? That week 12 game has NOTHING to do with this weeks game...
Gb has 1 Wr, who completely changed their entire offense....he was hurt in that game. Yes, he played but he wasnt actually healthy until about week 15. He was basically a decoy and SF knew it.
GB's D has been a monster since then allowing over 14 twice and nobody scored more than 24....they are the definition of bend but dont break....they will let you go down the field but force you to kick field-goals.
Their best lineman got hurt in the first quarter....
I can go on and on....
A week 12 matchup has nothing to do with a Conf final games....and its comical to see all the "Does GB even have a chance threads"....
You dont even need the points in this game, take the 7.5 or 8 if you want....but GB wins this game by 2 scores!!!
cant wait till you come back and say GB suxxxxxxxxxx #1 pass defense in playoffs at home alsmot perfect 10 wins 2 losses was shown on ESPN and NFL network i say 49ers 35 GB 14 or is 49ers now fully helthy defense smack rodgers around all day 49ers 28 GB 7
SF should have lost to Zona twice....was a 4th qtr comeback against the Rams from maybe even missing the playoffs.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller:
cant wait till you come back and say GB suxxxxxxxxxx #1 pass defense in playoffs at home alsmot perfect 10 wins 2 losses was shown on ESPN and NFL network i say 49ers 35 GB 14 or is 49ers now fully helthy defense smack rodgers around all day 49ers 28 GB 7
SF should have lost to Zona twice....was a 4th qtr comeback against the Rams from maybe even missing the playoffs.....
The packers have been one of the weakest and most underwhelming 13 win teams iv'e ever seen in my life time. They are average at everything, their offense has looked even less effective than it did with Mccarthy overall, especially past the first few drives and first quarter all season..
It's not just that they got beat the first game, I honestly can't even remember the last time a pro team got handled and tossed around like that, they looked like a slow big ten team against an SEC team from a decade ago in those matchups.. Not only that, the Niners have even more guys back on their D and are even fresher and most complete now. This could literally go the the same way, the packers might end up scoring a few more points, because it's impossible to get smashed again like they did but this is a horrific matchup. Rodgers would have to do all time great stuff and make everyone miss with pressure just to play with them.. or the Niners would have to complete turn it over multiple times or do nothing on offense to keep them around and keep giving them shots with the ball.. but let's be real, the Packers defense hasn't been any good either this year.
0
The packers have been one of the weakest and most underwhelming 13 win teams iv'e ever seen in my life time. They are average at everything, their offense has looked even less effective than it did with Mccarthy overall, especially past the first few drives and first quarter all season..
It's not just that they got beat the first game, I honestly can't even remember the last time a pro team got handled and tossed around like that, they looked like a slow big ten team against an SEC team from a decade ago in those matchups.. Not only that, the Niners have even more guys back on their D and are even fresher and most complete now. This could literally go the the same way, the packers might end up scoring a few more points, because it's impossible to get smashed again like they did but this is a horrific matchup. Rodgers would have to do all time great stuff and make everyone miss with pressure just to play with them.. or the Niners would have to complete turn it over multiple times or do nothing on offense to keep them around and keep giving them shots with the ball.. but let's be real, the Packers defense hasn't been any good either this year.
Give us a break Niner you and beginnergirl are the biggest Homers on Covers and it's not even close.
Wow. CanadaCup. Used to think you were a good dude. Now I just think you’re a terrible capper. You’ve been following my picks for years. Now you wanna bash me? Pretty sure any knowledgeable poster here knows I’m not a homer. Good luck with your plays today.
0
Quote Originally Posted by CanadaCup:
Quote Originally Posted by BigNiner:
Homer post of the year nominee
Give us a break Niner you and beginnergirl are the biggest Homers on Covers and it's not even close.
Wow. CanadaCup. Used to think you were a good dude. Now I just think you’re a terrible capper. You’ve been following my picks for years. Now you wanna bash me? Pretty sure any knowledgeable poster here knows I’m not a homer. Good luck with your plays today.
Scary part about the Pack is that they beat the Lions twice this year 23-22 at Lambeau and when they had to win in week 17 to get the 2nd seed they just squeaked by the Lions again 23-20 actually the Lions should have won both those games the week 17 game the Lions were missing half their team and played with two back up qbs. Remember that week 17 game was not a nothing game they had to win it.
0
Scary part about the Pack is that they beat the Lions twice this year 23-22 at Lambeau and when they had to win in week 17 to get the 2nd seed they just squeaked by the Lions again 23-20 actually the Lions should have won both those games the week 17 game the Lions were missing half their team and played with two back up qbs. Remember that week 17 game was not a nothing game they had to win it.
Scary part about the Pack is that they beat the Lions twice this year 23-22 at Lambeau and when they had to win in week 17 to get the 2nd seed they just squeaked by the Lions again 23-20 actually the Lions should have won both those games the week 17 game the Lions were missing half their team and played with two back up qbs. Remember that week 17 game was not a nothing game they had to win it.
good thing they are not playing the lions then
1
Quote Originally Posted by lookingtowin:
Scary part about the Pack is that they beat the Lions twice this year 23-22 at Lambeau and when they had to win in week 17 to get the 2nd seed they just squeaked by the Lions again 23-20 actually the Lions should have won both those games the week 17 game the Lions were missing half their team and played with two back up qbs. Remember that week 17 game was not a nothing game they had to win it.
SF should have lost to Zona twice....was a 4th qtr comeback against the Rams from maybe even missing the playoffs.....
Lol lol lol. They were never in danger of missing the playoffs, and shoulda woulda coulda lost gtfo out of here. 13-3 with all their losses coming at the last second. Can’t wait to visit this thread later. It’s almost as if you’re trying to convince yourself here buddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by LETGOPACK1234:
SF should have lost to Zona twice....was a 4th qtr comeback against the Rams from maybe even missing the playoffs.....
Lol lol lol. They were never in danger of missing the playoffs, and shoulda woulda coulda lost gtfo out of here. 13-3 with all their losses coming at the last second. Can’t wait to visit this thread later. It’s almost as if you’re trying to convince yourself here buddy
Dude wants to talk about almost losses, well you almost lost to the lions twice lol. 1 with help from the refs and the 2nd against David fn blough with a bye on the line lol.
0
Dude wants to talk about almost losses, well you almost lost to the lions twice lol. 1 with help from the refs and the 2nd against David fn blough with a bye on the line lol.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.