THANKS that trend has no capping involved but it wins at around 70% its just like the loser in sb. in gm.1 no capping it just wins. no logic why it wins?????
0
THANKS that trend has no capping involved but it wins at around 70% its just like the loser in sb. in gm.1 no capping it just wins. no logic why it wins?????
Yes, Steelers here, score misleading, Big Ben threw 5 picks (won't do that again), 2 returned for TD's, Steelers bounce back here, I belueve in Chiefs but I think they lose in this spot....
0
Yes, Steelers here, score misleading, Big Ben threw 5 picks (won't do that again), 2 returned for TD's, Steelers bounce back here, I belueve in Chiefs but I think they lose in this spot....
Never go against the streak, if anything bet with them until they lose.
That is lthe superficial Zombie GroupThink that gets casual sports bettors into trouble.
I have run several queries on this game and they ALL favor PIT. This is another one: Undefeated HF's in week 6plus are only 1-6 ATS vs. teams off exactly one loss as a HF. I don't claim that a sample size of 7 games is in any way considered reliable, but the results are certainly more promising than riding a long winning streak that entices the public (the early Covers consensus is lopsidedly KC).
Blak Mamba, good luck if you decide to actually bet KC. I am sure you're risking more than $10 like I did.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BLAK_MAMBA:
Never go against the streak, if anything bet with them until they lose.
That is lthe superficial Zombie GroupThink that gets casual sports bettors into trouble.
I have run several queries on this game and they ALL favor PIT. This is another one: Undefeated HF's in week 6plus are only 1-6 ATS vs. teams off exactly one loss as a HF. I don't claim that a sample size of 7 games is in any way considered reliable, but the results are certainly more promising than riding a long winning streak that entices the public (the early Covers consensus is lopsidedly KC).
Blak Mamba, good luck if you decide to actually bet KC. I am sure you're risking more than $10 like I did.
This is all too familiar. Last year week 3 steelers got embarrassed by philly on the road then blew out the chiefs. The locales are flipped but feels very similiar.
Fourth playoff revenge game this year first three had same result as playoff game. pats over Texans, falcons over packers, packers over cowboys.
Do you guys think line stays at -4 or keeps going up?
0
This is all too familiar. Last year week 3 steelers got embarrassed by philly on the road then blew out the chiefs. The locales are flipped but feels very similiar.
Fourth playoff revenge game this year first three had same result as playoff game. pats over Texans, falcons over packers, packers over cowboys.
Do you guys think line stays at -4 or keeps going up?
Chiefs will be a huge public play, I mean HUGE. If I continue to see money on the chiefs without the line budging, I'll be putting my house on Pitts.
Then AGIAN, chiefs are the real deal this season, Big Ben is on the way out and like an earlier poster said all playoffs rematchs have needed in the same result as last year
0
Chiefs will be a huge public play, I mean HUGE. If I continue to see money on the chiefs without the line budging, I'll be putting my house on Pitts.
Then AGIAN, chiefs are the real deal this season, Big Ben is on the way out and like an earlier poster said all playoffs rematchs have needed in the same result as last year
Chiefs will be a huge public play, I mean HUGE. If I continue to see money on the chiefs without the line budging, I'll be putting my house on Pitts.
Then AGIAN, chiefs are the real deal this season, Big Ben is on the way out and like an earlier poster said all playoffs rematchs have needed in the same result as last year
No they won't, Do you realize how much square money teams like Pittsburgh, Dallas, Green Bay and New England get? The chances of those 4 teams ever getting seriously out bet are about 1 %, Or unless they are facing each other. Despite KC being 5-0, They are a small market, Ignored by ESPN sort of team, Careful with this one.
Did we not learn anything from Dallas and Atlanta last year? Dallas covered 7 or 8 straight and Atlanta bucked every difficult trend going. Kansas City has already covered off the back of scoring 40 in week one against New England, and KC have only covered 5 straight, Covering 6 straight in the NFL isn't impossible. If anything you hope KC covers against Pitt, Then on a short week, You pound the Oakland Raiders with Carr playing the following Thursday.
Another thing for all of those calling the Chiefs 'square', Why is the line off the 3? Do you realize how rare it is for the Steelers to be made underdogs of 3.5 or more? I would have bet on the Steelers had this line been -3 -125 or something fishy, 4 throws out the theory of a 'trap line'.
Best of luck either way, Probably a no play for me, The poy bet for me this weekend is the Redskins -10 vs the 49ers. Back to back overtime games for the inept 49ers versus a solid Redskins team coming off a bye.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Jrod6:
Chiefs will be a huge public play, I mean HUGE. If I continue to see money on the chiefs without the line budging, I'll be putting my house on Pitts.
Then AGIAN, chiefs are the real deal this season, Big Ben is on the way out and like an earlier poster said all playoffs rematchs have needed in the same result as last year
No they won't, Do you realize how much square money teams like Pittsburgh, Dallas, Green Bay and New England get? The chances of those 4 teams ever getting seriously out bet are about 1 %, Or unless they are facing each other. Despite KC being 5-0, They are a small market, Ignored by ESPN sort of team, Careful with this one.
Did we not learn anything from Dallas and Atlanta last year? Dallas covered 7 or 8 straight and Atlanta bucked every difficult trend going. Kansas City has already covered off the back of scoring 40 in week one against New England, and KC have only covered 5 straight, Covering 6 straight in the NFL isn't impossible. If anything you hope KC covers against Pitt, Then on a short week, You pound the Oakland Raiders with Carr playing the following Thursday.
Another thing for all of those calling the Chiefs 'square', Why is the line off the 3? Do you realize how rare it is for the Steelers to be made underdogs of 3.5 or more? I would have bet on the Steelers had this line been -3 -125 or something fishy, 4 throws out the theory of a 'trap line'.
Best of luck either way, Probably a no play for me, The poy bet for me this weekend is the Redskins -10 vs the 49ers. Back to back overtime games for the inept 49ers versus a solid Redskins team coming off a bye.
No they won't, Do you realize how much square money teams like Pittsburgh, Dallas, Green Bay and New England get? The chances of those 4 teams ever getting seriously out bet are about 1 %, Or unless they are facing each other. Despite KC being 5-0, They are a small market, Ignored by ESPN sort of team, Careful with this one.
Did we not learn anything from Dallas and Atlanta last year? Dallas covered 7 or 8 straight and Atlanta bucked every difficult trend going. Kansas City has already covered off the back of scoring 40 in week one against New England, and KC have only covered 5 straight, Covering 6 straight in the NFL isn't impossible. If anything you hope KC covers against Pitt, Then on a short week, You pound the Oakland Raiders with Carr playing the following Thursday.
Another thing for all of those calling the Chiefs 'square', Why is the line off the 3? Do you realize how rare it is for the Steelers to be made underdogs of 3.5 or more? I would have bet on the Steelers had this line been -3 -125 or something fishy, 4 throws out the theory of a 'trap line'.
Best of luck either way, Probably a no play for me, The poy bet for me this weekend is the Redskins -10 vs the 49ers. Back to back overtime games for the inept 49ers versus a solid Redskins team coming off a bye.
Chiefs are a huge public play as of now, but it is early. Steelers are big public team but they have burned the public three times in five games. Failing to cover at browns, losing at bears and last week against jags. Throw in big ben having the worst game of his career, then a depressing postgame interview and you will have a lot of public bettors jumping ship.
Technically kc has covered 5 straight but that redskins game wasn't a real cover, and they probably would have lost straight up if Josh norman didn't get hurt.
With you on Redskins vs 49ers though.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234:
No they won't, Do you realize how much square money teams like Pittsburgh, Dallas, Green Bay and New England get? The chances of those 4 teams ever getting seriously out bet are about 1 %, Or unless they are facing each other. Despite KC being 5-0, They are a small market, Ignored by ESPN sort of team, Careful with this one.
Did we not learn anything from Dallas and Atlanta last year? Dallas covered 7 or 8 straight and Atlanta bucked every difficult trend going. Kansas City has already covered off the back of scoring 40 in week one against New England, and KC have only covered 5 straight, Covering 6 straight in the NFL isn't impossible. If anything you hope KC covers against Pitt, Then on a short week, You pound the Oakland Raiders with Carr playing the following Thursday.
Another thing for all of those calling the Chiefs 'square', Why is the line off the 3? Do you realize how rare it is for the Steelers to be made underdogs of 3.5 or more? I would have bet on the Steelers had this line been -3 -125 or something fishy, 4 throws out the theory of a 'trap line'.
Best of luck either way, Probably a no play for me, The poy bet for me this weekend is the Redskins -10 vs the 49ers. Back to back overtime games for the inept 49ers versus a solid Redskins team coming off a bye.
Chiefs are a huge public play as of now, but it is early. Steelers are big public team but they have burned the public three times in five games. Failing to cover at browns, losing at bears and last week against jags. Throw in big ben having the worst game of his career, then a depressing postgame interview and you will have a lot of public bettors jumping ship.
Technically kc has covered 5 straight but that redskins game wasn't a real cover, and they probably would have lost straight up if Josh norman didn't get hurt.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
