My take, your weakest links to me are Det and Ten.
The Titans are so bad. I don't know why people keep backing them. They fall flat 8/10 times and then 2/10 times they look competent. Would never place a single $ on that team or Mariota ever again. On top of that, the sharp money is staying away from the Browns right now because they don't really know how good they will be and are on a wait and see approach. So if you think the line is telling you something, it's not. The Browns will likely win by DD.
Likewise, there are things I do not like about the Lions here and do like going for the Cardinals. I have the Cardinals in this game. 1 interesting trend is that teams that were 0-4 in the preseason that play a non-divisional team game 1 are like 2-16 ATS. On top of that Patricia seems like a slow to adjust coach and he will be facing a fast-paced offense and high thinking coach in Kingsbury. This isn't to say that the Cards are actually good but that the Lions are likely worse. Remember the Lions opened up last season at home to the Jets and lost in a blowout 42-10. This is not a team I would trust going up against an offense that no one has game tape on and a QB like Murray who will fling the ball relentlessly without fear. New QB's especially #1 overall picks usually have a good first game. And I do not trust or like what I saw from Stafford in the preseason.
Anyways I could be completely wrong here but theres are my 2 cents.
My take, your weakest links to me are Det and Ten.
The Titans are so bad. I don't know why people keep backing them. They fall flat 8/10 times and then 2/10 times they look competent. Would never place a single $ on that team or Mariota ever again. On top of that, the sharp money is staying away from the Browns right now because they don't really know how good they will be and are on a wait and see approach. So if you think the line is telling you something, it's not. The Browns will likely win by DD.
Likewise, there are things I do not like about the Lions here and do like going for the Cardinals. I have the Cardinals in this game. 1 interesting trend is that teams that were 0-4 in the preseason that play a non-divisional team game 1 are like 2-16 ATS. On top of that Patricia seems like a slow to adjust coach and he will be facing a fast-paced offense and high thinking coach in Kingsbury. This isn't to say that the Cards are actually good but that the Lions are likely worse. Remember the Lions opened up last season at home to the Jets and lost in a blowout 42-10. This is not a team I would trust going up against an offense that no one has game tape on and a QB like Murray who will fling the ball relentlessly without fear. New QB's especially #1 overall picks usually have a good first game. And I do not trust or like what I saw from Stafford in the preseason.
Anyways I could be completely wrong here but theres are my 2 cents.
My take, your weakest links to me are Det and Ten.
The Titans are so bad. I don't know why people keep backing them. They fall flat 8/10 times and then 2/10 times they look competent. Would never place a single $ on that team or Mariota ever again. On top of that, the sharp money is staying away from the Browns right now because they don't really know how good they will be and are on a wait and see approach. So if you think the line is telling you something, it's not. The Browns will likely win by DD.
Likewise, there are things I do not like about the Lions here and do like going for the Cardinals. I have the Cardinals in this game. 1 interesting trend is that teams that were 0-4 in the preseason that play a non-divisional team game 1 are like 2-16 ATS. On top of that Patricia seems like a slow to adjust coach and he will be facing a fast-paced offense and high thinking coach in Kingsbury. This isn't to say that the Cards are actually good but that the Lions are likely worse. Remember the Lions opened up last season at home to the Jets and lost in a blowout 42-10. This is not a team I would trust going up against an offense that no one has game tape on and a QB like Murray who will fling the ball relentlessly without fear. New QB's especially #1 overall picks usually have a good first game. And I do not trust or like what I saw from Stafford in the preseason.
Anyways I could be completely wrong here but theres are my 2 cents.
My take, your weakest links to me are Det and Ten.
The Titans are so bad. I don't know why people keep backing them. They fall flat 8/10 times and then 2/10 times they look competent. Would never place a single $ on that team or Mariota ever again. On top of that, the sharp money is staying away from the Browns right now because they don't really know how good they will be and are on a wait and see approach. So if you think the line is telling you something, it's not. The Browns will likely win by DD.
Likewise, there are things I do not like about the Lions here and do like going for the Cardinals. I have the Cardinals in this game. 1 interesting trend is that teams that were 0-4 in the preseason that play a non-divisional team game 1 are like 2-16 ATS. On top of that Patricia seems like a slow to adjust coach and he will be facing a fast-paced offense and high thinking coach in Kingsbury. This isn't to say that the Cards are actually good but that the Lions are likely worse. Remember the Lions opened up last season at home to the Jets and lost in a blowout 42-10. This is not a team I would trust going up against an offense that no one has game tape on and a QB like Murray who will fling the ball relentlessly without fear. New QB's especially #1 overall picks usually have a good first game. And I do not trust or like what I saw from Stafford in the preseason.
Anyways I could be completely wrong here but theres are my 2 cents.
rams, sb hangover bad trend week 1 on the road at 10 am pt after having no starters play in the preseason against an underrated panthers team. For the cards lions, lions are a good pick, Kingsbury had a losing record in college, he should not be an nfl coach, Patrick Peterson is suspended. lions defense has top ten potential, cards have a bad oline.
rams, sb hangover bad trend week 1 on the road at 10 am pt after having no starters play in the preseason against an underrated panthers team. For the cards lions, lions are a good pick, Kingsbury had a losing record in college, he should not be an nfl coach, Patrick Peterson is suspended. lions defense has top ten potential, cards have a bad oline.
rams, sb hangover bad trend week 1 on the road at 10 am pt after having no starters play in the preseason against an underrated panthers team. For the cards lions, lions are a good pick, Kingsbury had a losing record in college, he should not be an nfl coach, Patrick Peterson is suspended. lions defense has top ten potential, cards have a bad oline.
rams, sb hangover bad trend week 1 on the road at 10 am pt after having no starters play in the preseason against an underrated panthers team. For the cards lions, lions are a good pick, Kingsbury had a losing record in college, he should not be an nfl coach, Patrick Peterson is suspended. lions defense has top ten potential, cards have a bad oline.
The write-up above is spot on about TEN. I wouldn't bet on them EVER (and I live in Tennessee)!
I'd also stay away from SF. West coast teams playing on the east coast, AS DOGS, usually don't cover. The LAR are pretty close (though a slim fav) to the same scenario though I only see CAR win by a point or two.
The write-up above is spot on about TEN. I wouldn't bet on them EVER (and I live in Tennessee)!
I'd also stay away from SF. West coast teams playing on the east coast, AS DOGS, usually don't cover. The LAR are pretty close (though a slim fav) to the same scenario though I only see CAR win by a point or two.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.