All Forums | NFL Betting

Denver and New England both lose next week

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 10744
Posts: 128
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 2013
Posted: #51
Patriots 6 games vs teams over 500 3-3 you guys are drinking the kool aid too much these teams have not been challenged consistently 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 2013
Posted: #52
NE was the only test on the sced for houston??? Huh do your research 7 teams over .500 in regular season alone 4-3 cincy playoffs 5-3 just don't spew nonsense they went into denver and beat denver 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2012
Posts: 144
Posted: #53
Houston came into the post season cold with plenty of people liking the Bungals. Texans won unconvincingly at home and now travel to FOXBOROUGH IN JANUARY. Really?

The reality is Houston's offense just isn't catching traction. Getting in the redzone and settling for 3 might get you by Cincy but the Pats will turn around and put up 7 in response.

Houston's defense is good enough to keep them in most games their offense blows but not against Brady in the post season.

I mean did you guys not watch the games last weekend? Balty and Houston look weak and won't keep up with NE/Den. Don't over think this one, both favorites win.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 7296
Posted: #54
Well i do like Kool Aid but I don't like the Texans here.  You can throw that 3-3 record out the window as the Patriots look to get back to the SuperBowl once again after losing to the G-Men once again last year.  The Patriots are motivated and the proof will be on the scoreboard at the end of this game.  As for the Ravens those old timers like Ray Lewis will be sucking mile high wind this weekend.  I can see them sitting on the side line with oxygen masks on as they try to keep up with Manning.  Don't let Flacco fool you he is mediocre at best. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 2013
Posted: #55
Did you watch the games lol? minus the turnovers baltimore would have steam rolled, and I think Houston got back to what they do running foster granted the didn't score in the red zone but I was encouraged by their running game 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 2013
Posted: #56
The flacco hate to me is the craziest of all these comments look at his past 4 playoff games hes been awesome 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 2013
Posted: #57
I understand the schuab hate he has not proven himself they are a running team that plays off the play action and he has never had a good playoff game but the joe flacco hate is just flat out stupid 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 500
Posted: #58

Quote Originally Posted by cowboys173418:

everyone under estimates the bengals, they had won 7 out of 8 lost by 1 point on a last second fg a game they were up by 9 in the 4th quarter they are a good defensive team

I dont think that everyone is under estimating all that much... I think the problems is that your OVER-estimating bal and hou...

and the flacco hate is the same as the ryan hate ( matty) just called as most people seeing it... its not that these guy are great and we all say hes not.. its that they are average and are more down than they are up...

I think I do pretty well for a capper and honestly I like to go on whats happing now rather than stats.. only thing ill say that could hurt or benifit den,ne,atl,sf is that the rest might help or hurt them... that we wont know til game time...

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 500
Posted: #59

flacco use to qualify as above average but as of last 2 seasons watching him play he is not the same...like I said more down than up...

 

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 500
Posted: #60

+ 1 on the not a fan of schaub

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 2013
Posted: #61
flacco should be a super bowl qb I don't know if he would have won but he was good enough to beat NE @ NE and he was good last game flacco won't be the reason they lose if they do 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 500
Posted: #62

I did like the connections between flacco and boldin this past wild card game, however I dont think they will be connecting like that against Den, for the second matchup..and please keep in mind balt played the highly overrated colts.. Indy had the easiet schedule for a fact..i dont know why u said den or ne had the easiest one.. but we all know indy had that title coming after last year.. as KC will next year with the exception of Den cause they are in division ...

but oh well, again best of luck  on your picks

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 7296
Posted: #63
first off i dont hate on flacco i just dont like him or the ravens in this spot.  i think the texans have talent and i also dont hate schaub i just dont like him in this spot as well.  the bengals are a good team just not good enough though.  dalton is a mediocre qb as well.  the spreads are big for a reason.  take a stab at the large number i can understand your point of view.  i just think the texans and ravens are both going to be in trouble based off their playoff matchups.  it doesnt look good for them when i look at the matchups.  i respect your opinion but disagree thats all.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 16
Posted: #64
Denver and Seahawks in the Super Bowl 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 212
Posted: #65
Quote Originally Posted by cowboys173418:

I will play +10 on both of them although I think they both win straight up, New England's terrible defense gets exposed and Houston D steps up makes adjustments after embarrassing loss. Reminds me a lot of year Jets got murdered by Pats in reg season then went in and beat them in playoffs, not as confident about baltimore but I think they win in a defensive battle, I think both faves in NFC cover Atlanta is only -1, I think they come out and get over the hump.

LMAO!! cant believe you said denver and ne lose straight up. New England defense shut No Offense Houston. Even if they do score, you think houston defense can really stop Tom Brady and his crew? They can adjust FAST and will outplay them.

Flacco on the road is JUST bad. You're saying this because they beat Colts who are just as bad as Ravens on the road. Remember, Peyton Manning plays way better under pressure and playoff games are extra pressure. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2012
Posts: 2297
Posted: #66
its the NFL. Anything can happen. Everyone saying the Pats and Broncos won't/can't lose are kidding themselves. If that were the case, you would be unloading on the ML at -900.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 260
Posted: #67
Quote Originally Posted by cowboys173418:

there is no way a team that is 12-4, 12 and 4!! should be underdog by 10 vs anybody, even brady says last game means nothing, wade will make adjustments he obviously will not run man to man all game again


Vegas loves jokers like you who base so much value in record...
Funny how you contradict yourself, you no 12-4 team should be a 10 pt dog as if the 12 win mark means everything, yet you claim Denver and Pats are so overrated while boasting similar records.  I hope you put 5 large on Houston ML, bet that 12-4 record makes it pay off!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 18
Posted: #68

Quote Originally Posted by Raidernator76:

Flaco on the road to win

I hear that!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 18
Posted: #69
Quote Originally Posted by Slurve-Ball:

I 2nd that!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2011
Posts: 3140
Posted: #70
If Denver AND Pats both lose straight up...
I will NEVER bet another game as long as I live.
I could see one maybe losing, but they should both win.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2010
Posts: 5
Posted: #71
both lose
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 1
Posted: #72
Hey I know i don't know anything, but what are you smoking? NE and Denver lose,This is Mannings best team, and patriots will blow them out again, Strub will play that slow down keep the clock going boring game, settle for three, Cinn played terrible, don't look for NE to do that not at home in winter conditions, Texans come outside, not those stupid dome stadiums,
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2007
Posts: 926
Posted: #73
BOTH  teams  win  and dever covers
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 1114
Posted: #74
Quote Originally Posted by cowboys173418:

No chance? One team has won 12 games and the other is an experienced team that was a dropped pass away from the super bowl last year, meanwhile the Pats and the broncos are the two most overrated teams in the nfl who have the easiest schedules in the nfl 

You are hilarious.  You state your belief that two top AFC seeds are going down, but then you take the cowards way out and tease them both.  Pathetic.  And FYI this is not last year.  Or do you like the Giants to win it all?

Pats win.  Broncos win.  You will lose your tease as well.


 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 2013
Posted: #75
I didn't tease anything 
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.