i went 2-2 in single bet on Wildcard games, won Houston and Denver but lost on Detroit and Atlanta. Hopefully, i can have better next week on the Divisional round.
Saturday games,
San Francisco +3.5 (-115), i like better defense taking points playing at home.
Denver +14 (-120), New England might win a large margin again in this second matchup of the season but i'm taking chance on Tebow against a defense that ranked in the bottom of the league.
Sunday games,
Houston +7.5 (-110), i'll grab over a touchdown on Houston's defense vs Joe Flacco.
Green Bay -8.5 (-110), Packers are well rested and i think Aaron Rodgers could take advantage of the banged up NY secondary this time around.
Good luck!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
i went 2-2 in single bet on Wildcard games, won Houston and Denver but lost on Detroit and Atlanta. Hopefully, i can have better next week on the Divisional round.
Saturday games,
San Francisco +3.5 (-115), i like better defense taking points playing at home.
Denver +14 (-120), New England might win a large margin again in this second matchup of the season but i'm taking chance on Tebow against a defense that ranked in the bottom of the league.
Sunday games,
Houston +7.5 (-110), i'll grab over a touchdown on Houston's defense vs Joe Flacco.
Green Bay -8.5 (-110), Packers are well rested and i think Aaron Rodgers could take advantage of the banged up NY secondary this time around.
Interestingly, I absolutely nailed both of the spreads for the New Orleans @ San Francisco and Denver @ New England games . 3.5 & 14 right after the conclusion of each wild card game. That means I'm pretty good at predicting opening spreads, but it also means, it will be difficult to pick a side.
0
Interestingly, I absolutely nailed both of the spreads for the New Orleans @ San Francisco and Denver @ New England games . 3.5 & 14 right after the conclusion of each wild card game. That means I'm pretty good at predicting opening spreads, but it also means, it will be difficult to pick a side.
Yeah, Roberto, Predicting a spread and pick a right side are tow different animals, for sure. Picking the right one just isn't as smooth, i assume. Good luck to whatever you play on Divisionals.
0
Yeah, Roberto, Predicting a spread and pick a right side are tow different animals, for sure. Picking the right one just isn't as smooth, i assume. Good luck to whatever you play on Divisionals.
Interestingly, I absolutely nailed both of the spreads for the New Orleans @ San Francisco and Denver @ New England games . 3.5 & 14 right after the conclusion of each wild card game. That means I'm pretty good at predicting opening spreads, but it also means, it will be difficult to pick a side.
Roberto, knowing the spreads now, give us your leans for all 4 games.................nice hit on the Saints yesterday...............
0
Quote Originally Posted by RobertoFiory:
Interestingly, I absolutely nailed both of the spreads for the New Orleans @ San Francisco and Denver @ New England games . 3.5 & 14 right after the conclusion of each wild card game. That means I'm pretty good at predicting opening spreads, but it also means, it will be difficult to pick a side.
Roberto, knowing the spreads now, give us your leans for all 4 games.................nice hit on the Saints yesterday...............
This is Europa's thread , and when I viewed it, it was the first time I saw the spreads for those games. This is why I commented on, them . I am pretty good at predicting spreads, but sometimes the opening spreads reflect the play on the field, and sometimes they reflect perceived public backing, regardless of play on the field . This is why you should always establish your own spread and compare it to the actual spread. Do no let the spread dictate your side, but rather see how much it differs from yours. Proper handicapping involves making your own spreads. That's a good exercise to determine your own " true " spread .
0
This is Europa's thread , and when I viewed it, it was the first time I saw the spreads for those games. This is why I commented on, them . I am pretty good at predicting spreads, but sometimes the opening spreads reflect the play on the field, and sometimes they reflect perceived public backing, regardless of play on the field . This is why you should always establish your own spread and compare it to the actual spread. Do no let the spread dictate your side, but rather see how much it differs from yours. Proper handicapping involves making your own spreads. That's a good exercise to determine your own " true " spread .
This is Europa's thread , and when I viewed it, it was the first time I saw the spreads for those games. This is why I commented on, them . I am pretty good at predicting spreads, but sometimes the opening spreads reflect the play on the field, and sometimes they reflect perceived public backing, regardless of play on the field . This is why you should always establish your own spread and compare it to the actual spread. Do no let the spread dictate your side, but rather see how much it differs from yours. Proper handicapping involves making your own spreads. That's a good exercise to determine your own " true " spread .
Thats very true & I had the Pats at -14, the Ravens -6, the Packers -8 & the Saints -3, so the only one I was off a bit was the Ravens............
0
Quote Originally Posted by RobertoFiory:
This is Europa's thread , and when I viewed it, it was the first time I saw the spreads for those games. This is why I commented on, them . I am pretty good at predicting spreads, but sometimes the opening spreads reflect the play on the field, and sometimes they reflect perceived public backing, regardless of play on the field . This is why you should always establish your own spread and compare it to the actual spread. Do no let the spread dictate your side, but rather see how much it differs from yours. Proper handicapping involves making your own spreads. That's a good exercise to determine your own " true " spread .
Thats very true & I had the Pats at -14, the Ravens -6, the Packers -8 & the Saints -3, so the only one I was off a bit was the Ravens............
That Ravens/Houston game has me thinking because I have something on both sides of that game.........also, that line is higher that what I thought it would be.............
0
That Ravens/Houston game has me thinking because I have something on both sides of that game.........also, that line is higher that what I thought it would be.............
That Ravens/Houston game has me thinking because I have something on both sides of that game.........also, that line is higher that what I thought it would be.............
i'll take the points on a team with very good, if not better defense. You can drop the last three Houston's games since Wade was on hopital leave and Texans were locked with #3 seed with no incentives to play for.
0
Quote Originally Posted by PrimeTimeBoys:
That Ravens/Houston game has me thinking because I have something on both sides of that game.........also, that line is higher that what I thought it would be.............
i'll take the points on a team with very good, if not better defense. You can drop the last three Houston's games since Wade was on hopital leave and Texans were locked with #3 seed with no incentives to play for.
For now i would say i really like Orleans -3.5,,They played a big game
last up. I still think they could go all the way, Very hot QB.
i don't argue you much on that last game Saints played vs Lions but that Lions team had no defense what'sever. Matt Flynn had 6 TD's against that Lions team in week 17.
You like Denver +14, GB -8 and Houston +7.5 as of now?
0
Quote Originally Posted by wde:
For now i would say i really like Orleans -3.5,,They played a big game
last up. I still think they could go all the way, Very hot QB.
i don't argue you much on that last game Saints played vs Lions but that Lions team had no defense what'sever. Matt Flynn had 6 TD's against that Lions team in week 17.
You like Denver +14, GB -8 and Houston +7.5 as of now?
A great QB can make your defense look very bad, And also NO
had a very good defense. The other teams i can't say yet.
This is more of a passer league nowadays, so Brees might have a good day at SF this weekend. Pats one time did go to PIT and beat the Steelers in that AFC final as road -3 in 2004, Steelers were #1 in defense or so in that year. But home dogs in this round are 3-2 ATS since 1990. but you know this gamble, anything could happen.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wde:
A great QB can make your defense look very bad, And also NO
had a very good defense. The other teams i can't say yet.
This is more of a passer league nowadays, so Brees might have a good day at SF this weekend. Pats one time did go to PIT and beat the Steelers in that AFC final as road -3 in 2004, Steelers were #1 in defense or so in that year. But home dogs in this round are 3-2 ATS since 1990. but you know this gamble, anything could happen.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.