Call me a square all day, ey day, up until Sunday But I am on the first four of those plays I think those are a piece of cake Those are lines everyone should take And if you don't, you will awake With empty pockets and a pounding headache
True Life
Not so sure on the Seabirds game though
0
Time for me to rhyme a little bit:
Call me a square all day, ey day, up until Sunday But I am on the first four of those plays I think those are a piece of cake Those are lines everyone should take And if you don't, you will awake With empty pockets and a pounding headache
I actually like Buffalo to cover the game, see Seattle winning by a field goal. Buffalo D has been playing much better since the bye week (minus the NE game).
I will take AZ as well. I wont bet on this game but give me the home team getting a TD almost every time.
Also love the Rams in this spot against a 1 dimensional Vikings team. STL showed they can stop the run and play physical (see both San Fran games) and they will force Ponder to beat them. Which I don't think he can without Harvin.
I will take Manning in this spot as square as it may be. He has proved in the past he could put up points on the Ravens and that was the Ravens with a good D. He has been a cover machine since they started to Gel during that SD game.
Torn on the Packers. I think they are a bad matchup for the Bears, which has been proven the last several times they have played. The Bears have not showed a good pass rush recently which has been the demise of the Packers. The Bears also have one of the worst O lines in the league and the Pack got to Cutler early and often earlier this year. If the Packers can run the ball they win. That being said I love home dogs especially in a division matchup.
*Should note I do a weekly picks ATS for all games at work. We get set lines on Tuesday. I am getting the Pack -2.5, STL -3, and Det -6. That changes my thinking a little bit. I might bite on Detroit and the Packers with those "Bait" lines on the road.
0
I actually like Buffalo to cover the game, see Seattle winning by a field goal. Buffalo D has been playing much better since the bye week (minus the NE game).
I will take AZ as well. I wont bet on this game but give me the home team getting a TD almost every time.
Also love the Rams in this spot against a 1 dimensional Vikings team. STL showed they can stop the run and play physical (see both San Fran games) and they will force Ponder to beat them. Which I don't think he can without Harvin.
I will take Manning in this spot as square as it may be. He has proved in the past he could put up points on the Ravens and that was the Ravens with a good D. He has been a cover machine since they started to Gel during that SD game.
Torn on the Packers. I think they are a bad matchup for the Bears, which has been proven the last several times they have played. The Bears have not showed a good pass rush recently which has been the demise of the Packers. The Bears also have one of the worst O lines in the league and the Pack got to Cutler early and often earlier this year. If the Packers can run the ball they win. That being said I love home dogs especially in a division matchup.
*Should note I do a weekly picks ATS for all games at work. We get set lines on Tuesday. I am getting the Pack -2.5, STL -3, and Det -6. That changes my thinking a little bit. I might bite on Detroit and the Packers with those "Bait" lines on the road.
Do not bet the Bills. The coaching has been terrible lately and even though their D is better, the O line is banged up and Fitz was getting slapped around last week vs the Rams. Seattle has the better D and better team
0
Do not bet the Bills. The coaching has been terrible lately and even though their D is better, the O line is banged up and Fitz was getting slapped around last week vs the Rams. Seattle has the better D and better team
Sidenote. Vegas knows they will lose to about half the "square" plays on a weekly basis. They can only adjust spreads so much without leaving themselves vunerable. All they need to do is go 50% on these type of games and they profit. Key is in mho is to ignore these and just cap games accordingly.
0
Quote Originally Posted by EarnMoney:
Where do you get those information from??
Thats what I am wondering.
Sidenote. Vegas knows they will lose to about half the "square" plays on a weekly basis. They can only adjust spreads so much without leaving themselves vunerable. All they need to do is go 50% on these type of games and they profit. Key is in mho is to ignore these and just cap games accordingly.
Funny how the books are holding the Packers at -3 with all this action. Noone wants any part of the Bears even at +3. If this line closes at -3, watch out
0
Funny how the books are holding the Packers at -3 with all this action. Noone wants any part of the Bears even at +3. If this line closes at -3, watch out
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
for u League...thanks a million hope u keep us updated sir.BOL
Hot Forum Topics
