All Forums | NFL Betting

Everyone was on GREENBAY icluding all the touts ...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1706
Posts: 33
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #1
they really burned alot of people...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #2
Including*
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #3

I had them and the Over. Got bailed out a little on a Rogers Prop. I'll rebound and regroup for next week.

Hester was the difference in this one.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #4
I had the Bears and the under also teased as posted in my chicago weather thread... BEARS BACKERS!!!!
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2007
Posts: 813
Posted: #5
 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 27318
Posted: #6
11 penalties in the second half. But a few of them were real ticky tack calls. This was a total fluke win for Chicago, though nowhere near as bad as their week one win.

I hope the books make them the faves to win the division now. I would love to get the way better team Green Bay at plus money.

I am pretty sure GB blows them out in the rematch when the home call bias will be in their favor and not against them.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2009
Posts: 260
Posted: #7
WOW Other great fix again damn to much money lol vegas called it right again refs new it haha
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by BurningPlanet26:

11 penalties in the second half. But a few of them were real ticky tack calls. This was a total fluke win for Chicago, though nowhere near as bad as their week one win.

I hope the books make them the faves to win the division now. I would love to get the way better team Green Bay at plus money.

I am pretty sure GB blows them out in the rematch when the home call bias will be in their favor and not against them.
It just wasnt their night!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 2627
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by BurningPlanet26:

11 penalties in the second half. But a few of them were real ticky tack calls. This was a total fluke win for Chicago, though nowhere near as bad as their week one win.

I hope the books make them the faves to win the division now. I would love to get the way better team Green Bay at plus money.

I am pretty sure GB blows them out in the rematch when the home call bias will be in their favor and not against them.

You're right..all 18 Green Bay penalties were home calls lol

Give me a break...Green Bay wasn't disciplined and their Special Teams got rocked which is 1/3 of a team.

GB has a lot of work to do.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #10

BP AND CROW

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 2041
Posted: #11

CHI comes thru again against a public team

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by TampaTony:

CHI comes thru again against a public team

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 2969
Posted: #13
My site had the Bears moneyline and the under, so I don't think all of them had it.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by vegasflyer1:

My site had the Bears moneyline and the under, so I don't think all of them had it.
76 percent and above all bet the packers...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1757
Posted: #15

Quote Originally Posted by michaelpaul1:

I had the Bears and the under also teased as posted in my chicago weather thread... BEARS BACKERS!!!!

You And Me Both  Ugly Win BUT A WIN

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by peanutt612:

You And Me Both  Ugly Win BUT A WIN

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #17

LANG

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2006
Posts: 433
Posted: #18
Fucking sucked. 3 int's and 3 penalties. c'mon guys... fucked over without lube lol
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2005
Posts: 2969
Posted: #19

Monday Nights are so much different than the games on Sunday. Number 1 they are showcased. Number 2 the home team value is worth much more. Number 3 there is another 24 hours of BS to listen to before the game starts. Number 4 Home team dogs are gold most of the time on Monday night. Tonight was also a double revenge division game and of course the team was at home and had a history of playing well on Monday night,

Other factors that can cause a misperception is the fact that people could be hedging the Bears on a parlay, making the Packers look like the big public opinion. Reading into Monday nights lines do not necessarly show the correct percentage.

Grant it, there are alot of Packer fans, so I'm sure the public was the majority on Green Bay. You just can't beat home team underdogs on Monday night, very often.

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2008
Posts: 33072
Posted: #20
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 214
Posted: #21
How about HOME DOG (MIAMI) next Monday night?

GL 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by vegasflyer1:

Monday Nights are so much different than the games on Sunday. Number 1 they are showcased. Number 2 the home team value is worth much more. Number 3 there is another 24 hours of BS to listen to before the game starts. Number 4 Home team dogs are gold most of the time on Monday night. Tonight was also a double revenge division game and of course the team was at home and had a history of playing well on Monday night,

Other factors that can cause a misperception is the fact that people could be hedging the Bears on a parlay, making the Packers look like the big public opinion. Reading into Monday nights lines do not necessarly show the correct percentage.

Grant it, there are alot of Packer fans, so I'm sure the public was the majority on Green Bay. You just can't beat home team underdogs on Monday night, very often.

good recap..
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2000
Posts: 11995
Posted: #23

B. Lang had 30 Dimes on GB-3. I noted this in another thread. This guy is an automatic fade.

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2008
Posts: 32063
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by cisco:

B. Lang had 30 Dimes on GB-3. I noted this in another thread. This guy is an automatic fade.

LOL.. That guy is still around?

 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2007
Posts: 22613
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by Crowkillers:

LOL.. That guy is still around?

Its gold Jerry ...GOLD!!!!
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.