Friendly reminder from your financial advisor....you don't need the points

All the sharp action on covers, I say 2 threads on the ML.  Not to say there weren't more, but you get it.

Please stop leaving money on the table.  If you like the dog, play the ML.  If you need the points (3 or less) you don't like the play or its probably thin anyway.

Absolute nonsense 

Always is until the numbers show it's not

Literally the next game that had a 3 point spread or less....

YOU ARE OFFICIALLY FIRED AS MY FINANCIAL ADVISOR!

@vanzack

There is a serious point here....

And that is that unless there are shifts in the relationship between spread and ML pricing in terms of NFL results changing over time....

The ML and spreads are fairly priced.  The Lions / Rams is just anecdotal - but funny timing.

That advice wouldn't have done well on the Rams/Lions game.....

@vanzack

@vanzack

 That's OK, your retainer check was returned insufficient funds.

Also it closed +3.5, which would indicate points as I've always said.

@unplucked_gem

OK pal.  3.5?  Yeah, OK.

You are going to be sweating the Bucs game tonight because it would be very funny if....

@vanzack

Bud, I know it can get confusing when you put out 6 lines for every game with multiple units, but if you need an excel guy to keep things straight you can Venmo me upfront.

@unplucked_gem

@vanzack

 Hey chief, I don't control outcome.  If it happens it happens, not going to change the play.

@unplucked_gem

"Please stop leaving money on the table"

Funniest shit ever.

Just believe the guy who says the Lions closed at -3.5.  Thats the guy who provides zero stats to back up his claim.  Just listen to this guy.

https://www.sportsbookreview.com/scores/nfl-football/matchup/298285/

See a +3.5?  Great zip it.  But you're you so you'll widen the posts to talk about only shit books had +3.5.

Also, there was a post I made all season (well half) that tracked exactly this that you commented on.  But you're the legend so what do I know.

You might in fact be the greatest hater, but you are quite shit handicapper.

For the record too, still waiting on your SuperContest player name to check the record when it's record play with only 1 unit per play.

#Bobcaygeon-1 

"I'm Vanzack, I take the yacht to Vegas through the Hoover Dam Canal to register in person to the tune of $1,000.  Then I create a post about how we're going to track the results all year only to disappear after week 1 citing my picks are not reflective of my handicapping process"

But I'm the fraud 

Trying to punch up.  Not taking the bait.  My record (over the past 20 years) speaks for itself.

Yours - well - we have to trust you because the line last night ended on -3.5 (yeah ok) and well, you know that taking the ML is better than taking 3 points.

OK.  Carry on.  This is actually the pitch of most financial advisors - so you werent wrong when you said you were one.

@unplucked_gem

You are ok!!!!! Perhaps, 100% Miscommunication between us!!!!! I like your insight now!!!!! Much Respect!!!!! And Good luck!!!!!

@vanzack

OK Chappelle.  You've been losing in the SuperContest for 20 years.  Maybe a different hobby.

Good luck on your fictitious plays and units, but for the love of God just don't leave any more money on the table today.

Just FYI...

I have been in the SuperContest 3 times in my life.

1 of those 3 times I came in 9th place, I think I won 56K but I dont remember.

Those are the facts.

@vanzack

 I was thinking the exact same thing! It is nonsense. The best gambling advice I ever got was to ALWAYS take the points. LAR/DET was a great example, I liked the Rams to win but I took the points.