According to the 2009-10 NFL team salaries database, the player's got 3B. Both sides agree that there is 9B to split. I don't think it's unfair to ask what the NFL did with 6b dollars.
0
According to the 2009-10 NFL team salaries database, the player's got 3B. Both sides agree that there is 9B to split. I don't think it's unfair to ask what the NFL did with 6b dollars.
Depends on whom i has my money on. Do you think Jerry Jones could sell the team and stadium for a billion if he put it on the market? Isn't that it's estimated worth.
I believe it's the richest valued franchise in sports, $1.5B.
He bought the team in 1989 for $279M + or - a couple mil.
Not a bad investment huh?
I wonder if his facelift was a team expense?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
Depends on whom i has my money on. Do you think Jerry Jones could sell the team and stadium for a billion if he put it on the market? Isn't that it's estimated worth.
I believe it's the richest valued franchise in sports, $1.5B.
He bought the team in 1989 for $279M + or - a couple mil.
You mean the owners have offered a fair deal by asking for 1 BILLION more off the top? Wow, that's pretty fair. I see your point. Perhaps you should look a little closer at the facts before picking a side.
Thank you
The owners 1st biggest gripe was the rookie salary cap, players agreed.
As it stands, the owners don't want to show why they need the extra billion. They want to provide the info THEY want to provide, not what the players have asked. If your going to say your profits are steadily declining, then prove it. PERIOD.
Also the owners want to make it where a player has to be in the league for 7 years before they can become an unrestricted free agents. How is that a fair deal? Especially when rb's average career length is 4 years.
I just don't think you really know what's going on. Funny you take the side of BILLIONAIRES saying they offered a fair deal. Now that's
0
Quote Originally Posted by wickedj:
You mean the owners have offered a fair deal by asking for 1 BILLION more off the top? Wow, that's pretty fair. I see your point. Perhaps you should look a little closer at the facts before picking a side.
Thank you
The owners 1st biggest gripe was the rookie salary cap, players agreed.
As it stands, the owners don't want to show why they need the extra billion. They want to provide the info THEY want to provide, not what the players have asked. If your going to say your profits are steadily declining, then prove it. PERIOD.
Also the owners want to make it where a player has to be in the league for 7 years before they can become an unrestricted free agents. How is that a fair deal? Especially when rb's average career length is 4 years.
I just don't think you really know what's going on. Funny you take the side of BILLIONAIRES saying they offered a fair deal. Now that's
yeah i think the players are greedy. both are greedy but players have no right. they make plenty of money why dont they just save there money for possible future injuries. why should the nfl care about you after you are done with the league? u made plenty of money already. i cannot stand these players anymore. kind of glad the lockout is here. hope the players go broke and beg the owners later for a pay check. just cause you work for a company and help them make money does not mean u deserve part of the revenue. that is the stupidest thing i have ever heard of.
0
yeah i think the players are greedy. both are greedy but players have no right. they make plenty of money why dont they just save there money for possible future injuries. why should the nfl care about you after you are done with the league? u made plenty of money already. i cannot stand these players anymore. kind of glad the lockout is here. hope the players go broke and beg the owners later for a pay check. just cause you work for a company and help them make money does not mean u deserve part of the revenue. that is the stupidest thing i have ever heard of.
Guys ive just tried this shit... its earns MONEY!! :S it apparently bets on two diferent places on the same game... and whoever wins lets say federer or nadal you still get the profit :S you bet on both of them shit is real!!!!!!! lol i dont want to look like spamer or shit like that haha altough those webs look like one just checkt the shit out
Guys ive just tried this shit... its earns MONEY!! :S it apparently bets on two diferent places on the same game... and whoever wins lets say federer or nadal you still get the profit :S you bet on both of them shit is real!!!!!!! lol i dont want to look like spamer or shit like that haha altough those webs look like one just checkt the shit out
Guys ive just tried this shit... its earns MONEY!! :S it apparently bets on two diferent places on the same game... and whoever wins lets say federer or nadal you still get the profit :S you bet on both of them shit is real!!!!!!! lol i dont want to look like spamer or shit like that haha altough those webs look like one just checkt the shit out
Guys ive just tried this shit... its earns MONEY!! :S it apparently bets on two diferent places on the same game... and whoever wins lets say federer or nadal you still get the profit :S you bet on both of them shit is real!!!!!!! lol i dont want to look like spamer or shit like that haha altough those webs look like one just checkt the shit out
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.