They finally have the above average defense after spending their picks and money on defense last two years....this offense they bring in a deep-speed threat and a tight-end and they win the Superbowl!! Not enough weapons to do it this year, because you cant make a run with 1 offensive threat in Adams....but next year look out!!!
They finally have the above average defense after spending their picks and money on defense last two years....this offense they bring in a deep-speed threat and a tight-end and they win the Superbowl!! Not enough weapons to do it this year, because you cant make a run with 1 offensive threat in Adams....but next year look out!!!
Yes, next year. What is wrong with that? They are just a couple pieces away this year. I dont get what is wrong predicting it for next year?
I just dont think they have enough this year. In the playoffs, teams will double, maybe triple Adams. The rest of the options arent good enough to make a deep run. But, if they can add a deep threat and a TE in the middle, with the run game they havent had in years, next year they are going to be dangerous!!
If they can get the 1 seed this year, it will be the best chance in years. Sure NO and 49ers are great teams, but going into GB in January?? Also Rodgers has clearly fallen off a little but at home he is still a very special dude. But a win next week against Detroit secures at least a 2 seed and that is still so so important. Even if they have to go to SF for the championship game, its a free for all and they may have learned their lesson, but that includes that SF doesnt lose to NO in the divisional
Agreed....Rodgers has missed so many throws this year, kinda crazy to see after how good he has been the last few years. Crazy to think they have a better run game than passing game....never thought I would say that with Rodgers. I think he is just being over-cautious with the ball, but even that INT last night....if he gets that over the defender Adams runs for 50yds or more because nobody was behind him.
But, home field would be huge. I dont see SF losing this week, so a win against the Lions will get the #2 seed. The Saints being the #3 seed would have to come to GB and not playing them on the turf, but the frozen tundra would be huge. Alexander is going to need alot of help with Thomas, but I like our line against theirs. That could set up a rematch against SF, which I would expect a much different game plan. But...winning next week is the first step!!!
If they win next week, they would be on a 5 game win streak with momentum and would have a bye. Perfect set up for a super bowl run
Ok, but the Rams did one thing buff and minn have not. They won a SB. Not only that.. they won ore merger championships. They are not those other teams. They don' fall under the same karma umbrella. The Rams are a more important part of the 100 year history than those other teams.
New stadium for a LA team = super bowl win. Judt like they won when they moved to st louis. Judt like they won right before they left Cleveland and when they went to LA 3 or 4 seasons later.
They scored 8 points vs 49ers...they aren't going to do crap in the playoffs
11 vs Chargers= they will suck in the playoffs.
And I am a Rams and Packers fan lol. I'm impartial when it comes to entertainment sports.
Packers are a no go, lousy pick
They scored 8 points vs 49ers...they aren't going to do crap in the playoffs
11 vs Chargers= they will suck in the playoffs.
And I am a Rams and Packers fan lol. I'm impartial when it comes to entertainment sports.
Packers are a no go, lousy pick
damn you really dont know how anything works
They scored 8 points vs 49ers...they aren't going to do crap in the playoffs
11 vs Chargers= they will suck in the playoffs.
And I am a Rams and Packers fan lol. I'm impartial when it comes to entertainment sports.
Packers are a no go, lousy pick
You mean- you dont. Watch and learn grasshopper
Main relation? Not sure.... scoring 8 vs a team that is a super bowl contender and 11 vs a suck team. Are pretty good future indicators that they'll bite when it counts.
2 games mean nothing, especially the chargers one. Every team this year has had a game or 2 where they play horrible. Seattle vs Arizona last week? NO vs Atlanta and vs rams? NE vs ravens, chiefs and texans? Vikings against GB and Chicago?
Thats why 2 bad packers games mean nothing since every team has bad losses
Nothing you said has anything to do with it. Most of you'e examples are divisionsal. Seattle? They lost three games at home. They had multiple bad games, they suck. Ravens? Since they moved from Cleveland, they basically relatively own the Pats when it really matters, compared to other teams.
Lol vikings have been pretenders for 50 years. They also suck when it counts.
You see? You aren't grasping that I'm using teams/league history. Not just a couple games from this season. The Packers lost to a best team and a worst team, scoring only 8 and 11 points. It means that when it matters, they will ultimately suck/lose. They are not destiny this year.
Pay attention.. Rodgers= State Farm= SF= san francisco.
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
