All SOLID points...plus the week off...to heal and sharpen with new wrinkles....I "like" the Packers...but 49er's will be ready..and the PUBLIC seems to be on Green Bay. Tough to call this game.
All SOLID points...plus the week off...to heal and sharpen with new wrinkles....I "like" the Packers...but 49er's will be ready..and the PUBLIC seems to be on Green Bay. Tough to call this game.
Rogers is getting all his weapons on offense back
Kaepernick's first playoffs.
Matthews
Manningham
Cheering for the 49ers, but not surprise if GB Wins
Rogers is getting all his weapons on offense back
Kaepernick's first playoffs.
Matthews
Manningham
Cheering for the 49ers, but not surprise if GB Wins
Rogers is getting all his weapons on offense back
Kaepernick's first playoffs.
Matthews
Manningham
Cheering for the 49ers, but not surprise if GB Wins
Which weapons was he ever missing?
Rogers is getting all his weapons on offense back
Kaepernick's first playoffs.
Matthews
Manningham
Cheering for the 49ers, but not surprise if GB Wins
Which weapons was he ever missing?
1st round byes, especially in the NFC over the past few years, have not led to a good winning %
As for your points....
1st round byes, especially in the NFC over the past few years, have not led to a good winning %
As for your points....
Which weapons was he ever missing?
Really? Did you even watch any Packers game this year? Grant, Jennings, Nelson....just for starters
Which weapons was he ever missing?
Really? Did you even watch any Packers game this year? Grant, Jennings, Nelson....just for starters
Really? Did you even watch any Packers game this year? Grant, Jennings, Nelson....just for starters
All 3 played in the first game...
Really? Did you even watch any Packers game this year? Grant, Jennings, Nelson....just for starters
All 3 played in the first game...
All 3 played in the first game...
Ummm thats neat. I guess since 2 of them played in the very first game of the season over 4 months ago, we should just expect the same thing. In fact the result MUST be the exact same no? Now that ya mention it, i do recall every single team thats played an opponent twice in the same season the results were identical. thanks for shedding light on that.
Not to mention you asked what weapons was he ever missing this season, and thus i told you. Nor did anyone mention anything about "stars" so im not sure where that one came into play.
All 3 played in the first game...
Ummm thats neat. I guess since 2 of them played in the very first game of the season over 4 months ago, we should just expect the same thing. In fact the result MUST be the exact same no? Now that ya mention it, i do recall every single team thats played an opponent twice in the same season the results were identical. thanks for shedding light on that.
Not to mention you asked what weapons was he ever missing this season, and thus i told you. Nor did anyone mention anything about "stars" so im not sure where that one came into play.
Possibly......I think they would get TONS more action on GB if the line was 4, 4.5 or 5
I mean they already won by a TD plus in GB and have a much more dominant team
Possibly......I think they would get TONS more action on GB if the line was 4, 4.5 or 5
I mean they already won by a TD plus in GB and have a much more dominant team
Ummm thats neat. I guess since 2 of them played in the very first game of the season over 4 months ago, we should just expect the same thing. In fact the result MUST be the exact same no? Now that ya mention it, i do recall every single team thats played an opponent twice in the same season the results were identical. thanks for shedding light on that.
Not to mention you asked what weapons was he ever missing this season, and thus i told you. Nor did anyone mention anything about "stars" so im not sure where that one came into play.
Youre the one that listed getting weapons back was a factor therefor implying HAVING them meant some kind of change in result, but he DID have them. Dont change the topic now to adjustment and results just because youre first statement was uninformed. And to call someone a weapon implies star...or are bad players weapons too? And if so wouldnt any player Rodgers had at any time be a weapon then?
Ummm thats neat. I guess since 2 of them played in the very first game of the season over 4 months ago, we should just expect the same thing. In fact the result MUST be the exact same no? Now that ya mention it, i do recall every single team thats played an opponent twice in the same season the results were identical. thanks for shedding light on that.
Not to mention you asked what weapons was he ever missing this season, and thus i told you. Nor did anyone mention anything about "stars" so im not sure where that one came into play.
Youre the one that listed getting weapons back was a factor therefor implying HAVING them meant some kind of change in result, but he DID have them. Dont change the topic now to adjustment and results just because youre first statement was uninformed. And to call someone a weapon implies star...or are bad players weapons too? And if so wouldnt any player Rodgers had at any time be a weapon then?
1st round byes, especially in the NFC over the past few years, have not led to a good winning %
As for your points....
Lines are not about who will win or whos better. Its about controlling the betting action. Betting 101
1st round byes, especially in the NFC over the past few years, have not led to a good winning %
As for your points....
Lines are not about who will win or whos better. Its about controlling the betting action. Betting 101
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.