I have this parlay with Giants needed to cover 6.5 in the last leg. What is the hedge? Thank you in advance.
Risking 25.00 to win 389.24
Bet Green Bay -5.5
And pray they win by 6 points exactly.
You would cover on both bets (middle) and you get hedge exposure in case the giants don't cover. Definitely hedge and guarantee a profit. GL.
I have done this on a few parlays on the last leg/s.
Bet Green Bay -5.5
And pray they win by 6 points exactly.
You would cover on both bets (middle) and you get hedge exposure in case the giants don't cover. Definitely hedge and guarantee a profit. GL.
I have done this on a few parlays on the last leg/s.
*IF* you are a well documented proven WINNER, consistently year after year, in a given sport, then the odds of you winning the last leg of your parlay are already in your favor for the big payoff - so don't hedge, let it ride in all similar situations.
BUT .... if you are not a consistently PROVEN winner year after year in that sport, then HEDGE!!!!! ![]()
*IF* you are a well documented proven WINNER, consistently year after year, in a given sport, then the odds of you winning the last leg of your parlay are already in your favor for the big payoff - so don't hedge, let it ride in all similar situations.
BUT .... if you are not a consistently PROVEN winner year after year in that sport, then HEDGE!!!!! ![]()
Every scenario is unique but my basic rule of thumb is usually this:
#1 You made the bet expecting it to win correct? What has changed to make you think it will no longer win?
#2 is the amount of money life changing TO YOU, everyone’s different? If not then what the reason for wanting to take less on a bet you originally thought would win?
Every scenario is unique but my basic rule of thumb is usually this:
#1 You made the bet expecting it to win correct? What has changed to make you think it will no longer win?
#2 is the amount of money life changing TO YOU, everyone’s different? If not then what the reason for wanting to take less on a bet you originally thought would win?
