@Rebel27
@Theasscritic
Going under by 10 or more points is what created the huge value at the current number of 46.5/47. Why would I remove the 10 points of value and make a bet at under 36.5/37? That makes no sense and would be stupid. The key to betting successfully is finding the value and capitalizing on it, not finding the value only to remove it and try to play hero with a bigger payout potential.
@CCO687
@Unstoppable Force
@Jakariya
@beemerville
@sandyman
@Mskeets
@Fuse
@O-K-Man
@QBUN
@JustinJefferson
No I'm not Darren, but the timing of you getting banned wasn't coincidence. Fishing is one of my hobbies and so is exposing people like you, ironically they sometimes go hand-in-hand.
@tweets50
Let's keep stacking the cash!
@Rebel27
@Theasscritic
Going under by 10 or more points is what created the huge value at the current number of 46.5/47. Why would I remove the 10 points of value and make a bet at under 36.5/37? That makes no sense and would be stupid. The key to betting successfully is finding the value and capitalizing on it, not finding the value only to remove it and try to play hero with a bigger payout potential.
@CCO687
@Unstoppable Force
@Jakariya
@beemerville
@sandyman
@Mskeets
@Fuse
@O-K-Man
@QBUN
@JustinJefferson
No I'm not Darren, but the timing of you getting banned wasn't coincidence. Fishing is one of my hobbies and so is exposing people like you, ironically they sometimes go hand-in-hand.
@tweets50
Let's keep stacking the cash!
@SportsIntuition
Once again !!! It’s your comment that confused me
Now your confusing me more as you talk about the value that existed in the total
You took away some of the value in the line because you devalued it buy jacking it to 47
u laid 12/10
but since the line already had value , 10 pts in your opinion , why not take advantage of the value and win more
u should of laid 12/10.91
so u lost 9.1 % in profits because you
DECREASED the value of the 46.5 , which u already said had 10 pts of value , so you didn’t capitalize on the value as you cost yourself 9.1 % in profits
@SportsIntuition
Once again !!! It’s your comment that confused me
Now your confusing me more as you talk about the value that existed in the total
You took away some of the value in the line because you devalued it buy jacking it to 47
u laid 12/10
but since the line already had value , 10 pts in your opinion , why not take advantage of the value and win more
u should of laid 12/10.91
so u lost 9.1 % in profits because you
DECREASED the value of the 46.5 , which u already said had 10 pts of value , so you didn’t capitalize on the value as you cost yourself 9.1 % in profits
@Theasscritic
You are confusing yourself by overthinking it.
I don't worry about what I could have had if I did "this" or "that".
Instead, I focus on making money with the least amount of risk and what I get to keep when it's over.
@Theasscritic
You are confusing yourself by overthinking it.
I don't worry about what I could have had if I did "this" or "that".
Instead, I focus on making money with the least amount of risk and what I get to keep when it's over.
@Theasscritic
My comments make perfect sense if you choose to see through my eyes and understand my style which has been made very public here during the course of the season.
@Theasscritic
My comments make perfect sense if you choose to see through my eyes and understand my style which has been made very public here during the course of the season.
@SportsIntuition
Your stlye isn’t the issue, I am new here so I just saw your comments , I was a bit confused , that’s all
i see how you roll now , stay hot sharp shooter
@SportsIntuition
Your stlye isn’t the issue, I am new here so I just saw your comments , I was a bit confused , that’s all
i see how you roll now , stay hot sharp shooter
Tout says what?
Tout says what?
@Theasscritic
Since you're new here, this is how you interprete SI. By understanding his vocabulary, you'll get less annoyed.
HUGE = 1 star
GOY = 2 star
Over/Under "should win by 10" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
Underdog "should win straight up" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
"Wrong team favored" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
"Opponent is in a terrible spot" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
IIRC, buying points has helped him twice in football, turning 1 push into a win and 1 loss into a push. So his record is better because of buying, but his profits are lower.
@Theasscritic
Since you're new here, this is how you interprete SI. By understanding his vocabulary, you'll get less annoyed.
HUGE = 1 star
GOY = 2 star
Over/Under "should win by 10" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
Underdog "should win straight up" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
"Wrong team favored" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
"Opponent is in a terrible spot" = buy 1/2 point to be safe
IIRC, buying points has helped him twice in football, turning 1 push into a win and 1 loss into a push. So his record is better because of buying, but his profits are lower.
And the record is more important than the profit when you are selling picks instead of betting picks.
And the record is more important than the profit when you are selling picks instead of betting picks.
@starguide
Lol yes I was a confused with a comment , just tried to understand his words , and yes buying pts consistently will cut into profits , u guys are correct , that being said at the same time if he is comfortable with the
AMOUNTS
he wins utilizing his style then that’s how he rolls , sounds like he’s more comfortable zoning in on KEY numbers from what I’ve seen in his posts in my short time here
There will always be different opinions on how a sports bettor should and should not bet , but at the end of the day people are not wired the same , especially gamblers , LOL and sports betting offers a variety of betting methods for a reason obviously
the books know their are many many different types of bettors out there
im not into the drama , just had a couple of questions for him, that’s all
we’re all after the same outfit at the end of the day , how one chooses to attack is up to them
Good luck to all in the forum
@starguide
Lol yes I was a confused with a comment , just tried to understand his words , and yes buying pts consistently will cut into profits , u guys are correct , that being said at the same time if he is comfortable with the
AMOUNTS
he wins utilizing his style then that’s how he rolls , sounds like he’s more comfortable zoning in on KEY numbers from what I’ve seen in his posts in my short time here
There will always be different opinions on how a sports bettor should and should not bet , but at the end of the day people are not wired the same , especially gamblers , LOL and sports betting offers a variety of betting methods for a reason obviously
the books know their are many many different types of bettors out there
im not into the drama , just had a couple of questions for him, that’s all
we’re all after the same outfit at the end of the day , how one chooses to attack is up to them
Good luck to all in the forum
Furthermore im aware that nfl games hit 47 about 3.4 % of the time , so that’s about once every 33 games
im not sure though how often it hits 47 when buying up from only 46.5 , higher % I would imagine
Furthermore im aware that nfl games hit 47 about 3.4 % of the time , so that’s about once every 33 games
im not sure though how often it hits 47 when buying up from only 46.5 , higher % I would imagine
Being more accurate
Totals Landed on 47 , 3.12 % of the time between 2003 and 2023
Slightly higher specifically buying off 46.5 id imagine but obviously not worth it, a bettor is losing substantial profits with this play
SOURCE
cleanuphitter.com
Being more accurate
Totals Landed on 47 , 3.12 % of the time between 2003 and 2023
Slightly higher specifically buying off 46.5 id imagine but obviously not worth it, a bettor is losing substantial profits with this play
SOURCE
cleanuphitter.com
@vanzack
could you be wrong here? you seem dead set on SI going TOUT. he has broken no rules and causes zero nonsense here yet every day its the same shit.... all he does is post plays with a -120 line and he's in everyone's head over it.
I respect you Van, you do tons here, maybe just wish him luck instead
@vanzack
could you be wrong here? you seem dead set on SI going TOUT. he has broken no rules and causes zero nonsense here yet every day its the same shit.... all he does is post plays with a -120 line and he's in everyone's head over it.
I respect you Van, you do tons here, maybe just wish him luck instead
@vanzack
Please Van, get over your unwarranted attack on SI. Your approaches here on Covers couldn't be any more Different and that's ok. Personally, I appreciate your reasoning behind your picks. SI doesn't do that. As long as WE win. I like your "eye test" angle..
Let's all keep winning at 60%..
VAN, you are a Treasure Here. We all know and Realize that.
@vanzack
Please Van, get over your unwarranted attack on SI. Your approaches here on Covers couldn't be any more Different and that's ok. Personally, I appreciate your reasoning behind your picks. SI doesn't do that. As long as WE win. I like your "eye test" angle..
Let's all keep winning at 60%..
VAN, you are a Treasure Here. We all know and Realize that.
It's not like when playing blackjack next to someone who doesn't hit a soft, or doesn't split double 10's. If you're trying to keep a count, it doesn't matter if you sit before or after this someone cause it's going to screw the odds on the NEXT correct play.
this guy laying more juice every post doesn't affect anyone's next play. More times than not I see posted lines that aren't available.
Is he a threat on a chat forum to other posters? NOPE
Is he disrespectful to others on a chat forum? not that I've seen but I'm no policeman.
Is he someone from covers past with a new username? Most likely
It's kinda Ironic that Van had a leach on his Bojangles about his "juice accurate" record not too long ago, Only ones worried are the followers
smoking man cat came back again, they'll all keep coming back with another cool username till covers starts charging a fee to post
It's not like when playing blackjack next to someone who doesn't hit a soft, or doesn't split double 10's. If you're trying to keep a count, it doesn't matter if you sit before or after this someone cause it's going to screw the odds on the NEXT correct play.
this guy laying more juice every post doesn't affect anyone's next play. More times than not I see posted lines that aren't available.
Is he a threat on a chat forum to other posters? NOPE
Is he disrespectful to others on a chat forum? not that I've seen but I'm no policeman.
Is he someone from covers past with a new username? Most likely
It's kinda Ironic that Van had a leach on his Bojangles about his "juice accurate" record not too long ago, Only ones worried are the followers
smoking man cat came back again, they'll all keep coming back with another cool username till covers starts charging a fee to post
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.