COMPLETELY NO CHANCE ... MEANS COMPLETELY NO CHANCE OF WINNING MORON ... DID THEY WIN ?? YOU ARE A WOULD BE IF YOU COULD BE CLOWN !!!
YOU ARE FOR CERTAIN NO MORE THAN 15 YEARS OLD ... GROW UP ...
LMAO The pick posted was the spread and you were allll buttt hurrrtt...there was no coversation about the ML chump.
You should use more caps...gets your point across...
Your picks are trash, lets see how much you lose today..
You should use more caps...gets your point across... Your picks are trash, lets see how much you lose today..
Yeah Sidney...got to agree with TimeisTruth here. You were off on this one...Rams were in this the whole way and had all the Chance in the world to even win the game, not to mention cover the spread which was what was in question in this thread. You acted more like 15 yrs old here with the emotional rebuttal with all caps, no need for that. Be humble, own it...move on to the winning streak. (advice for all)
Quote Originally Posted by Macwestie1:
No your not so BOL to both of us Bronxdude Post #18, 19, & 22, makes it encouraging to say the least
after reading this much informative thread with arguments on both sides considered before the game I decided taking the Rams.
High percentage here not giving the Rams a chance makes it encouraging taking the Dog it’s called gambling 
I really love this website to see what ppl thoughts on the games! But agreed with you... some ppl play with their Ick...not their head.. there were 1M reason why SF did not cover yesterday!
just a few samples
1. both game NE/Bills and SF/RAm had the same point spread -6.5
ppl know it’s Tougher for NE to cover.. bills just been hot...beat pitss last week ... so NE covered
SF was playing with RAM lower winning records.. so it’s easier for SF to cover... final won but not cover
2. my friends told me SF will blowout losing RAM and revenge with the lost last week! ‘Revenge’ ? No such thing in NFL :)
3. The whole world was leaning on SF.. :)
BOL to you for the rest of this season!
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
