All Forums | NFL Betting

I think RG3 will remain in Washington...

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 4395
Posts: 42
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8905
Posted: #1
I am adding the Washington Redskins to my picks for the 2017 Super Bowl in Texas 


Pittsburgh versus Washington is my top guess now 

RG3 will rise up 



 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 3590
Posted: #2

Rg3?  I think skins have a chance to make the playoffs with cousins, but gruden hates rg3,  How do you see this rg3 scenario with Washington unfoldinging?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2986
Posted: #3
RG3 is done playing for the Skins.... zero chance of that happening...
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8905
Posted: #4
RG3 is still in the Mix in Washington, Snyder has mentioned he wants RG3 on the Team......That is the main vote right there 

That sneaky little Dan Snyder is about to slide him back in with  the right team I place

Lets not Forget Texas is Part of Griffins Home town 
I will have the back up plan also 

GB versus Pitt
and Pitt versus Seattle,




 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 3590
Posted: #5

Do you have a source on the rg3 info?  Everything I see online says rg3 is done there and they are only holding him right now as leverage against cousin's negotiations.

You think philly has a chance?  I have a feeling  hiring Schwartz will improve the d  dramatically and Pederson will use murray the right way they could be the surprise of the nfc like panthers were this year.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 2986
Posted: #6
Quote Originally Posted by Gavinnick:

RG3 is still in the Mix in Washington, Snyder has mentioned he wants RG3 on the Team......That is the main vote right there 

That sneaky little Dan Snyder is about to slide him back in with  the right team I place

Lets not Forget Texas is Part of Griffins Home town 
I will have the back up plan also 

GB versus Pitt
and Pitt versus Seattle,




  Agree to disagree but  RG aint coming back...  Ever...  Already wrote his own obit.. no coming back from that..
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 5722
Posted: #7
Seattle will definitely remain in Washington.
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36999
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by ArtSchlichterJr:

  Agree to disagree but  RG aint coming back...  Ever...  Already wrote his own obit.. no coming back from that..

 Layin my $$ with Art......
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 4455
Posted: #9
Interesting topic, but I side with all the others, saying he is done in Washington. What's even more interesting to me, is, where will he land in 2016 if not with the Redskins?

He will never be an elite pocket passer, but in the right system with solid OL play, he can be an average passer, like many other QBs.

I think Dallas would be a very good fit for RG3. It would be a win-win-situation for both sides.

Advantages for RG3:

-Best OL in the league, great pass protection
-Good running game based on the OL, he doesn't have to do much
-Much less "under pressure" situations than at Washington
-Stays within the NFC East

Advantages for Dallas:

-Solid backup for Tony Romo, definitely better than Weeden, Cassel & Moore
-No need to take a QB with the 4th pick, sit back and take a guy that really makes this team better from day one
-A guy who knows the NFC East
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #10
I doubt it.  Seen crazier things happen.  They are having trouble signing Cousins, so who knows.  But Gruden and RGIII seem to have personality issues, and Gruden's coming back.  Yes Snyder still wants RGIII around.

The guy was phenomenal in his first year, rookie of the year, easy.  Led a bad team to the playoffs.  Then he got an injury and was never the same.  I think it's a confidence thing with his knees.  He's just not as reckless as he used to be.  Unless he gets his confidence back, he may be done.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2012
Posts: 3546
Posted: #11
Shoot me if I'm wrong but RG3 has a snowballs chance in hell of going back to Washingdong.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by BigRomes916:

Shoot me if I'm wrong but RG3 has a snowballs chance in hell of going back to Washingdong.


Not shooting

They wouldn't even let him dress, and he was the backup to Colt

They kept him on the roster because of his salary situation, that's all.  Actually made sense not to cut him until after the season

But, this is the offseason.  Johnny Manziel could be playing for the Argonauts
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2594
Posted: #13
Guys not built for the league. One of the prettiest deep balls ever seen but the guy can't play in the nfl. You can't be a dainty qb who looks to run and have no on-field awareness and expect to last. Wouldn't even want him as a backup. 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #14
Agree.  incredible talent (we saw it in year 1 in wash), but injuries will probably doom his career

he tore his acl's in college too

he's lost his confidence, he'll have to get it back to succeed, if he does he has a chance
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 4455
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by budwiser:

Agree.  incredible talent (we saw it in year 1 in wash), but injuries will probably doom his career

he tore his acl's in college too

he's lost his confidence, he'll have to get it back to succeed, if he does he has a chance


That's why he needs a good OL with a solid running game.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 17917
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:



That's why he needs a good OL with a solid running game.


Agreed Dallas would be a great spot for him to regain some confidence.  Jason Garrett won't pressure him like Gruden did, caused him to crumble. They have a good defense.  However, they'd also have to change thier approach to deal with a non-pocket passer.  And everybody knows they're looking at Manziel-won't take both.

He also went to Baylor, which is darn close to Dallas.

Pretty much spot on agree with your earlier post.  Almost didn't write my post because of it. lol  I think we're in agreement here.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8905
Posted: #17
To all,

RG3 is still in Washington
Lots of talk right now about this
Look for RG3 to restructure to stay in Washington.

This is the long shot for 2017 ....... You all go on about the favorites

I got Pitt. & Washington playing 2017
Or Seattle
Or GB
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1534
Posted: #18
He might be a 49er.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 4475
Posted: #19
 They just tagged Cousins for a little under 20 million, don't seem like they're too interested in RG3

Gotta go pee!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8905
Posted: #20
Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc:

 They just tagged Cousins for a little under 20 million, don't seem like they're too interested in RG3


that is smoke and mirrors 
until the deal RG3 .....I beleive RG3 makes a return to the starting line-up 2017 and leads the team
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 2594
Posted: #21
You're really grabbing at straws if you think franchising KC is smoke and mirrors. Griffin's just isn't an nfl player. For as much as some have questioned the pasts of Winston, Newton, and others it's like rg got a free pass. Maybe teams should of dug into it more.

But really he's a boy playing among men. When have you ever seen a player get tossed around like he does? You can't be a running qb without on-field awareness. With the injuries he's can't use his legs as crutch as much as he is used to. Dropping back he's beyond bad and is playing scarred. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2015
Posts: 3590
Posted: #22
Quote Originally Posted by Gavinnick:


that is smoke and mirrors 
until the deal RG3 .....I beleive RG3 makes a return to the starting line-up 2017 and leads the team

I thought you might be joking earlier, but now I am convinced you are.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 4475
Posted: #23
Keeping Griffin will cost the Skins a little over 16 million, why would they tie up 36 million on two questionable QB's and waste all that cap room?
Gotta go pee!
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2010
Posts: 8905
Posted: #24
Griffin still on board 

He may rise up from 2nd string and Take over 

Time is now for him 
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 8426
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by idle_havoc:

Keeping Griffin will cost the Skins a little over 16 million, why would they tie up 36 million on two questionable QB's and waste all that cap room?
They won't...Cousins signed a 'franchise' deal, meaning; RG3's days as a Redskin starting QB are over...the option of a $16m backup is not only unrealistic, but highly ludicrous to say the least. Synder may have many flaws as a NFL owner, paying RG3 16m to sit is not one of them; the question is "What happens next" most likely a trade, and compensation (draft pick) what team? that's anybody's guess at this point...one thing for sure, he won't be in a Redskins uniform come September...
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.