Eagles won't see a SB in the next 5 years or longer
Thanks for the congratulations which I deserved.
I lost three regular bets - PHL SU, PHL ATS and Under. That fumble made KC a SU and ATS winner. PHL outgained KC from scrimmage by a wide margin.
I won all three of my prop bets fading Mahomes because I accurately figured PHL's #1 passing DEF would control Mahomes to a degree. I had Mahomes Under 292.5 yards for 1.5 units (my only non-1-unit wager). He only gained 182 yards.
On Saturday I took Hurts +51 yards vs. Mahomes. Hurts gained 304 yards so I squeaked by with a tiny edge of 173 yards. On game day it had risen to Hurts +52.5 yards so I added another unit and finished with a small profit despite the costly turnover.
By the way, if you can accurately predict the turnover differential you are a better handicapper than I am and you'd have a license to print money. The Sports Database has playoff data all the way back to the 2001 season. Playoff teams with more turnovers in a PO game are 42-147-6 ATS, covering only 22.2% of the time.
Thanks for the congratulations which I deserved.
I lost three regular bets - PHL SU, PHL ATS and Under. That fumble made KC a SU and ATS winner. PHL outgained KC from scrimmage by a wide margin.
I won all three of my prop bets fading Mahomes because I accurately figured PHL's #1 passing DEF would control Mahomes to a degree. I had Mahomes Under 292.5 yards for 1.5 units (my only non-1-unit wager). He only gained 182 yards.
On Saturday I took Hurts +51 yards vs. Mahomes. Hurts gained 304 yards so I squeaked by with a tiny edge of 173 yards. On game day it had risen to Hurts +52.5 yards so I added another unit and finished with a small profit despite the costly turnover.
By the way, if you can accurately predict the turnover differential you are a better handicapper than I am and you'd have a license to print money. The Sports Database has playoff data all the way back to the 2001 season. Playoff teams with more turnovers in a PO game are 42-147-6 ATS, covering only 22.2% of the time.
Thanks for the congratulations which I deserved.
I lost three regular bets - PHL SU, PHL ATS and Under. That fumble made KC a SU and ATS winner. PHL outgained KC from scrimmage by a wide margin.
I won all three of my prop bets fading Mahomes because I accurately figured PHL's #1 passing DEF would control Mahomes to a degree. I had Mahomes Under 292.5 yards for 1.5 units (my only non-1-unit wager). He only gained 182 yards.
On Saturday I took Hurts +51 yards vs. Mahomes. Hurts gained 304 yards so I squeaked by with a tiny edge of 173 yards. On game day it had risen to Hurts +52.5 yards so I added another unit and finished with a small profit despite the costly turnover.
By the way, if you can accurately predict the turnover differential you are a better handicapper than I am and you'd have a license to print money. The Sports Database has playoff data all the way back to the 2001 season. Playoff teams with more turnovers in a PO game are 42-147-6 ATS, covering only 22.2% of the time.
Thanks for the congratulations which I deserved.
I lost three regular bets - PHL SU, PHL ATS and Under. That fumble made KC a SU and ATS winner. PHL outgained KC from scrimmage by a wide margin.
I won all three of my prop bets fading Mahomes because I accurately figured PHL's #1 passing DEF would control Mahomes to a degree. I had Mahomes Under 292.5 yards for 1.5 units (my only non-1-unit wager). He only gained 182 yards.
On Saturday I took Hurts +51 yards vs. Mahomes. Hurts gained 304 yards so I squeaked by with a tiny edge of 173 yards. On game day it had risen to Hurts +52.5 yards so I added another unit and finished with a small profit despite the costly turnover.
By the way, if you can accurately predict the turnover differential you are a better handicapper than I am and you'd have a license to print money. The Sports Database has playoff data all the way back to the 2001 season. Playoff teams with more turnovers in a PO game are 42-147-6 ATS, covering only 22.2% of the time.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.