It's sad because you act like you are 16 instead of 10 years older than that. I wonder what you do for a living because who in their holy mind would hire an immature dick like yourself. Man, that's baffling.
I own my own company...which most people on cover already know... Have a great life Serb... GL to your Colts
0
Quote Originally Posted by Serb89:
It's sad because you act like you are 16 instead of 10 years older than that. I wonder what you do for a living because who in their holy mind would hire an immature dick like yourself. Man, that's baffling.
I own my own company...which most people on cover already know... Have a great life Serb... GL to your Colts
Not to mention you came into a Colts backers thread and you're trying to convince someone to take the Jets and how the Colts suck. How fucking immature is that for someone your age. It's sad and pathetic to see.
0
Not to mention you came into a Colts backers thread and you're trying to convince someone to take the Jets and how the Colts suck. How fucking immature is that for someone your age. It's sad and pathetic to see.
Dude put a dime on chargers ML this week and lost. Trust me not worth it. the small payoff for the risk is true gambling. Play the line with a smaller amount and watch your Bankroll grow more. Whatever you do GL I hope you win I expect the colts to win but thought that about the chargers.
0
Dude put a dime on chargers ML this week and lost. Trust me not worth it. the small payoff for the risk is true gambling. Play the line with a smaller amount and watch your Bankroll grow more. Whatever you do GL I hope you win I expect the colts to win but thought that about the chargers.
Serb89 dude is seriously a waste of time. Someone who is clueless about football and thinks he knows it all. I straight up made him look dumb explaining my ML bet to him. He had nothing to say. Just do what I do and ignore him already
0
Serb89 dude is seriously a waste of time. Someone who is clueless about football and thinks he knows it all. I straight up made him look dumb explaining my ML bet to him. He had nothing to say. Just do what I do and ignore him already
Serb89 dude is seriously a waste of time. Someone who is clueless about football and thinks he knows it all. I straight up made him look dumb explaining my ML bet to him. He had nothing to say. Just do what I do and ignore him already
You're right man, that's a good idea. I am going to take your advice. Just can't wait till Sunday!
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
Serb89 dude is seriously a waste of time. Someone who is clueless about football and thinks he knows it all. I straight up made him look dumb explaining my ML bet to him. He had nothing to say. Just do what I do and ignore him already
You're right man, that's a good idea. I am going to take your advice. Just can't wait till Sunday!
In my mind and in my opinion there its almost impossible that Colts lose this game. So I think the Colts are going to surely win this game....I'm going the ML. Colts are laying 7.5 and they are up 14 with 3 minutes left. A backdoor cover is written all over it. As I also stated......The COLTS ML is the best bet i've perosnally ever seen.
0
Quote Originally Posted by wonwiththehook:
Why not lay 4400 for 4000 and give the points ?
In my mind and in my opinion there its almost impossible that Colts lose this game. So I think the Colts are going to surely win this game....I'm going the ML. Colts are laying 7.5 and they are up 14 with 3 minutes left. A backdoor cover is written all over it. As I also stated......The COLTS ML is the best bet i've perosnally ever seen.
Serb89 dude is seriously a waste of time. Someone who is clueless about football and thinks he knows it all. I straight up made him look dumb explaining my ML bet to him. He had nothing to say. Just do what I do and ignore him already
hahahahahaahahahahaahahahaahaha
0
Quote Originally Posted by SuperiorInsight:
Serb89 dude is seriously a waste of time. Someone who is clueless about football and thinks he knows it all. I straight up made him look dumb explaining my ML bet to him. He had nothing to say. Just do what I do and ignore him already
He could even get -130 buying a point at 6 1/2... But he's playing the ML at - 340... Worst play I've seen in a long time which is why I keep coming back to this thread... Mind boggling
0
He could even get -130 buying a point at 6 1/2... But he's playing the ML at - 340... Worst play I've seen in a long time which is why I keep coming back to this thread... Mind boggling
It was the #1 seed Detroit Red Wings taking on the #8 seed SJ Sharks...I believe the Sharks played real well the final week of the season just to make the PLayoffs...the Wings were the best team in the league by a long shot and Stanley Cup faves !!!
Anything can happen in ONE game...Manning gets drilled on first offensive series and the Colts are done. I wagered what I thought at the time was a no-brainer...no way the Arturs Irbe lead Sharks can defeat the mighty Wings in a Best of 7.
Sharks won in 7 games and I learned a very valuable lesson.
Don't make the same mistake Bro
0
OK.....let me chime in.
I once laid 9K to win a Grand.
SEVEN GAME NHL PLAYOFF SERIES
It was the #1 seed Detroit Red Wings taking on the #8 seed SJ Sharks...I believe the Sharks played real well the final week of the season just to make the PLayoffs...the Wings were the best team in the league by a long shot and Stanley Cup faves !!!
Anything can happen in ONE game...Manning gets drilled on first offensive series and the Colts are done. I wagered what I thought at the time was a no-brainer...no way the Arturs Irbe lead Sharks can defeat the mighty Wings in a Best of 7.
Sharks won in 7 games and I learned a very valuable lesson.
Cliche. Peytons pretty good from what I remember and the Colts have been in sync all year.
Really? They scored 15 and 20 in their two games vs Baltimore. They scored 18 vs San Francisco. They scored 20 vs Houston. The Jets have a better defense this year than ALL 3 of those teams.
Someone else in the thread predicted 45-3 Indianapolis. Hmmm....they haven't gotten to 42 points in a game all year and you think they will do it against the #1 defense in the NFL? I'd like to see logical basis for that prediction.
Someone else said that San Diego would have beaten them if not for all the "bullshit turnovers" they committed. You think MAYBE the defense has something to do with causing the turnovers? You think maybe Darrelle Revis is for real?
I do think Indy will win. This reminds me of the 2000 NFC CG, with the high powered Rams against the great defense, weak offense Bucs. The Rams did win, but Tampa covered the spread which was more than a TD and gave them a hell of a game in the dome in St Louis. And a lot of Ram moneyline betters collected, but they probalby were pissing their pants as the game came down to the wire.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ironlionzion722:
Cliche. Peytons pretty good from what I remember and the Colts have been in sync all year.
Really? They scored 15 and 20 in their two games vs Baltimore. They scored 18 vs San Francisco. They scored 20 vs Houston. The Jets have a better defense this year than ALL 3 of those teams.
Someone else in the thread predicted 45-3 Indianapolis. Hmmm....they haven't gotten to 42 points in a game all year and you think they will do it against the #1 defense in the NFL? I'd like to see logical basis for that prediction.
Someone else said that San Diego would have beaten them if not for all the "bullshit turnovers" they committed. You think MAYBE the defense has something to do with causing the turnovers? You think maybe Darrelle Revis is for real?
I do think Indy will win. This reminds me of the 2000 NFC CG, with the high powered Rams against the great defense, weak offense Bucs. The Rams did win, but Tampa covered the spread which was more than a TD and gave them a hell of a game in the dome in St Louis. And a lot of Ram moneyline betters collected, but they probalby were pissing their pants as the game came down to the wire.
In fact I have been capping for 10 years and have Never laid anything over -240 IF THAT.
The small return on such a large wager just flat out does not make sense. If I could advise you of anything I would recommend NOT making this wager. Your return on investment is shit<
Think about it... If I can take a ($1,000) thousand dollars and make $4,000 (Four thousand) or so - by capping, studying, and gambling --- WHY risk the huge lump sum of $13,600?? For about a THIRD of your TOTAL MONEY WAGERED.
Play with smaller amounts for value and nice returns.
Why have the potential to blow your load?
It simply does'nt make sense. You dont need to be a fucking CPA to figure this one out.
The only thing I can think of is that your bankroll is REALLY ONLY A ($136.00) One hundred and thirty six bucks and your going all in for 2 crispy twenty dollar bills.
BOL and even if you win, Im certain you did'nt bet 13k.
0
-340 is NOT a bargain ever.
In fact I have been capping for 10 years and have Never laid anything over -240 IF THAT.
The small return on such a large wager just flat out does not make sense. If I could advise you of anything I would recommend NOT making this wager. Your return on investment is shit<
Think about it... If I can take a ($1,000) thousand dollars and make $4,000 (Four thousand) or so - by capping, studying, and gambling --- WHY risk the huge lump sum of $13,600?? For about a THIRD of your TOTAL MONEY WAGERED.
Play with smaller amounts for value and nice returns.
Why have the potential to blow your load?
It simply does'nt make sense. You dont need to be a fucking CPA to figure this one out.
The only thing I can think of is that your bankroll is REALLY ONLY A ($136.00) One hundred and thirty six bucks and your going all in for 2 crispy twenty dollar bills.
BOL and even if you win, Im certain you did'nt bet 13k.
In fact I have been capping for 10 years and have Never laid anything over -240 IF THAT.
The small return on such a large wager just flat out does not make sense. If I could advise you of anything I would recommend NOT making this wager. Your return on investment is shit<
Think about it... If I can take a ($1,000) thousand dollars and make $4,000 (Four thousand) or so - by capping, studying, and gambling --- WHY risk the huge lump sum of $13,600?? For about a THIRD of your TOTAL MONEY WAGERED.
Play with smaller amounts for value and nice returns.
Why have the potential to blow your load?
It simply does'nt make sense. You dont need to be a fucking CPA to figure this one out.
The only thing I can think of is that your bankroll is REALLY ONLY A ($136.00) One hundred and thirty six bucks and your going all in for 2 crispy twenty dollar bills.
BOL and even if you win, Im certain you did'nt bet 13k.
... Well said... don't waste your time with these clowns
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kelly_Slater:
-340 is NOT a bargain ever.
In fact I have been capping for 10 years and have Never laid anything over -240 IF THAT.
The small return on such a large wager just flat out does not make sense. If I could advise you of anything I would recommend NOT making this wager. Your return on investment is shit<
Think about it... If I can take a ($1,000) thousand dollars and make $4,000 (Four thousand) or so - by capping, studying, and gambling --- WHY risk the huge lump sum of $13,600?? For about a THIRD of your TOTAL MONEY WAGERED.
Play with smaller amounts for value and nice returns.
Why have the potential to blow your load?
It simply does'nt make sense. You dont need to be a fucking CPA to figure this one out.
The only thing I can think of is that your bankroll is REALLY ONLY A ($136.00) One hundred and thirty six bucks and your going all in for 2 crispy twenty dollar bills.
BOL and even if you win, Im certain you did'nt bet 13k.
... Well said... don't waste your time with these clowns
In fact I have been capping for 10 years and have Never laid anything over -240 IF THAT.
The small return on such a large wager just flat out does not make sense. If I could advise you of anything I would recommend NOT making this wager. Your return on investment is shit<
Think about it... If I can take a ($1,000) thousand dollars and make $4,000 (Four thousand) or so - by capping, studying, and gambling --- WHY risk the huge lump sum of $13,600?? For about a THIRD of your TOTAL MONEY WAGERED.
Play with smaller amounts for value and nice returns.
Why have the potential to blow your load?
It simply does'nt make sense. You dont need to be a fucking CPA to figure this one out.
The only thing I can think of is that your bankroll is REALLY ONLY A ($136.00) One hundred and thirty six bucks and your going all in for 2 crispy twenty dollar bills.
BOL and even if you win, Im certain you did'nt bet 13k.
I'm not going to debate this. It's seriously not worth my time. You have nothing but a mere opinion. Whatever your opinion is I have two words for it. That's nice
0
Quote Originally Posted by Kelly_Slater:
-340 is NOT a bargain ever.
In fact I have been capping for 10 years and have Never laid anything over -240 IF THAT.
The small return on such a large wager just flat out does not make sense. If I could advise you of anything I would recommend NOT making this wager. Your return on investment is shit<
Think about it... If I can take a ($1,000) thousand dollars and make $4,000 (Four thousand) or so - by capping, studying, and gambling --- WHY risk the huge lump sum of $13,600?? For about a THIRD of your TOTAL MONEY WAGERED.
Play with smaller amounts for value and nice returns.
Why have the potential to blow your load?
It simply does'nt make sense. You dont need to be a fucking CPA to figure this one out.
The only thing I can think of is that your bankroll is REALLY ONLY A ($136.00) One hundred and thirty six bucks and your going all in for 2 crispy twenty dollar bills.
BOL and even if you win, Im certain you did'nt bet 13k.
I'm not going to debate this. It's seriously not worth my time. You have nothing but a mere opinion. Whatever your opinion is I have two words for it. That's nice
I personally don't give a dam if you believe my betting amounts or not. I would rather watch paint dry then personally give a dam if you believe me or not. I'd show you my betting tickets but it's really not necesscary
0
I personally don't give a dam if you believe my betting amounts or not. I would rather watch paint dry then personally give a dam if you believe me or not. I'd show you my betting tickets but it's really not necesscary
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Cliche. Peytons pretty good from what I remember and the Colts have been in sync all year.
... Well said... don't waste your time with these clowns
Hot Forum Topics
