We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
NE 13-3
NY 9-7
You have to take their records into consideration making NE the favorite.
This is the only reason I can see to making NE the favorite.
NE 13-3
NY 9-7
You have to take their records into consideration making NE the favorite.
This is the only reason I can see to making NE the favorite.
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
Actually a laughable post....You said the Pats have not allowed over 27 points all year then say they have to Buffalo and that was because of the 7 from the pick 6...C'mon brother if you analyze every defense in the league and add the Offense throwing a pick 6 you will find more teams in that category...." Actually, no. There are no other teams in this category, just the Pats DEFENSE. |
Freddy G ... BOL dude.
Just pick a side and let's get it ... this shit has been beaten to death for two weeks now here on Covers and everywhere else. Good luck to you but I am on NE.
Freddy G ... BOL dude.
Just pick a side and let's get it ... this shit has been beaten to death for two weeks now here on Covers and everywhere else. Good luck to you but I am on NE.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
The most meaningless stat of the decade, the Pats being the only team not to give-up more than 27 points.
So if they give-up 27 pts every game but never more that makes them better than a team that gave up 30 pts and 34 pts but gave-up 3 pts twice, 7 pts 3 times and 10 pts 4 times, according to the report the author would believe so.
We've had to hear endlessly about the Patriots' "31st-ranked defense," a fact based solely on the number of yards they allowed in the regular season. And there's no refuting it — they allowed a metric ton of yards. But that doesn't mean that they're terrible.
Let's offer another stat that does a nice job of balancing, courtesy of our Scott Kacsmar -- New England is the only defense in 2011 not to allow more than 27 points in a game once all season.
Does that sound like the work of a terrible defense?
New England did allow 34 points in a loss to Buffalo — but seven of those came thanks to a pick-six by the Bills' D, so only 27 of them were allowed by the D.
And if you've, you know, actually watched the Patriots' defense play over the last two months instead of just repeating the same tired stats, you get the picture of a team that plays physically up front, can get to the quarterback and is excellent in the red zone.
They have forced at least one turnover in 13 straight games, and after allowing an average of 477.5 the first four weeks they've allowed 379.8 the last 14 weeks — not a great number, but not a terrible one either, especially considering the amount of garbage time involved.
They are certainly prone to lapses in the secondary — frightening ones, at times — and have been inconsistent from half to half and even drive to drive. They are not the 2000 Baltimore Ravens. But they are certainly not terrible."
The most meaningless stat of the decade, the Pats being the only team not to give-up more than 27 points.
So if they give-up 27 pts every game but never more that makes them better than a team that gave up 30 pts and 34 pts but gave-up 3 pts twice, 7 pts 3 times and 10 pts 4 times, according to the report the author would believe so.
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan.
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan.
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan.
Good man I'm not here to argue.It's nice to see someone not totally blind to the fact the Patriots can't win.Hell I'm smart enough to know the Giants can win. I'm sure this will be a hell of a game.
Give me a break the Giants beat the Pats by 4 points scoring with less than a minute to go.You call that destroying.
How the hell did the Giants lose TWICE to the lowly
5 -11 REDSKINS ?
I believe the NY Giants play to their level of competition.. As a die hard fan , I believe the Giants are the better team.GL to the Patriots if you"re a fan.
Good man I'm not here to argue.It's nice to see someone not totally blind to the fact the Patriots can't win.Hell I'm smart enough to know the Giants can win. I'm sure this will be a hell of a game.
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
You are not wrong (and very cute too) the Niners would have beaten the Giants if not for 2 untimely miscues. Pats roll like the tide the back bay
You truely are a dick.No drop it was stripped.
Watch the replay numbnuts.
You truely are a dick.No drop it was stripped.
Watch the replay numbnuts.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.