I could see it obviously as offensive PI. I do not know why New Orleans didn’t challenge. They have nothing to lose in this case. In the opposite way, they could win a game if they win that challenge. Could anyone explain it to me?
CALCALB
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
I could see it obviously as offensive PI. I do not know why New Orleans didn’t challenge. They have nothing to lose in this case. In the opposite way, they could win a game if they win that challenge. Could anyone explain it to me?
In the last 2 mins of the game neither team can challenge it has to come from the booth and apparently they did review it and made it a non call...tough loss for the Saints AGAIN
0
In the last 2 mins of the game neither team can challenge it has to come from the booth and apparently they did review it and made it a non call...tough loss for the Saints AGAIN
That DB was a pip squeak, when the arm was extended you are supposed to pull it in towards you as the defender, he kinda tried to but failed miserably. They Should have scored more points. They did not show up to play plain and simple.
I like it! I like it alot!
0
That DB was a pip squeak, when the arm was extended you are supposed to pull it in towards you as the defender, he kinda tried to but failed miserably. They Should have scored more points. They did not show up to play plain and simple.
First off, it was defensive holding before the push off happened. Second, the push off like the one we saw, happens like every play and to call it there would be really bad for the league. All the star WR do it and have done it for years
0
First off, it was defensive holding before the push off happened. Second, the push off like the one we saw, happens like every play and to call it there would be really bad for the league. All the star WR do it and have done it for years
Philip- it’s a hold at first but the ref missed it. You could not challenge the hold but you could challenge the PI. I have seen a lot of time the offensive PI called in the same situations
CALCALB
0
Philip- it’s a hold at first but the ref missed it. You could not challenge the hold but you could challenge the PI. I have seen a lot of time the offensive PI called in the same situations
Philip- it’s a hold at first but the ref missed it. You could not challenge the hold but you could challenge the PI. I have seen a lot of time the offensive PI called in the same situations
There are no challenges allowed in OT. Both players were going at it and I think it was good they left it alone
0
Quote Originally Posted by CALB:
Philip- it’s a hold at first but the ref missed it. You could not challenge the hold but you could challenge the PI. I have seen a lot of time the offensive PI called in the same situations
There are no challenges allowed in OT. Both players were going at it and I think it was good they left it alone
Philip- it’s a hold at first but the ref missed it. You could not challenge the hold but you could challenge the PI. I have seen a lot of time the offensive PI called in the same situations
In the last two minutes of each half, and for the duration of overtime, coaches cannot initiate challenges. Everything is done from the booth. Furthermore, all scoring plays that occur at any point during the game are automatically reviewed by the booth.
This play, since it was a scoring play, was looked at immediately by the booth. They saw nothing. End of story.
We can argue if it should have been called, but the same people who are saying it was OPI are saying 'let 'em play' when it's against their own team.
The defender initiated the contact, I suspect that's why there was no call. They were handfighting the whole time, how could you even choose one player to penalize in that scenario?
0
Quote Originally Posted by CALB:
Philip- it’s a hold at first but the ref missed it. You could not challenge the hold but you could challenge the PI. I have seen a lot of time the offensive PI called in the same situations
In the last two minutes of each half, and for the duration of overtime, coaches cannot initiate challenges. Everything is done from the booth. Furthermore, all scoring plays that occur at any point during the game are automatically reviewed by the booth.
This play, since it was a scoring play, was looked at immediately by the booth. They saw nothing. End of story.
We can argue if it should have been called, but the same people who are saying it was OPI are saying 'let 'em play' when it's against their own team.
The defender initiated the contact, I suspect that's why there was no call. They were handfighting the whole time, how could you even choose one player to penalize in that scenario?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
