Week16 a lot of low line spreads but certain games I'm not touching like giants laying an egg last week and joe flacco? credit to cappers trying to cap that giants and ravens this week
Picks....
Lions +4
Bengals +4
Saints +3 (large)
Seahawks PK (large)
Nearing the end of season so I like to up my wagers on confident picks based off the program numbers
0
Week16 a lot of low line spreads but certain games I'm not touching like giants laying an egg last week and joe flacco? credit to cappers trying to cap that giants and ravens this week
Picks....
Lions +4
Bengals +4
Saints +3 (large)
Seahawks PK (large)
Nearing the end of season so I like to up my wagers on confident picks based off the program numbers
I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta. If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team. Let me know if it accounts for injuries? Thanks
Bengals Saints Seahawks
0
I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta. If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team. Let me know if it accounts for injuries? Thanks
I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta. If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team. Let me know if it accounts for injuries? Thanks
Bengals Saints Seahawks
Just do a 4 team round robin . I have doing that the last month $$$
0
Quote Originally Posted by JAl239:
I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta. If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team. Let me know if it accounts for injuries? Thanks
Bengals Saints Seahawks
Just do a 4 team round robin . I have doing that the last month $$$
I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta. If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team. Let me know if it accounts for injuries? Thanks
Bengals Saints Seahawks
Yes the program does take in account injuries which is why the Detroit offense numbers have dropped prior to the numbers they had on thanksgiving...Lions have better percentage numbers on offense but a decent defense...I will always wager on a home dog that has a higher offense percentage...plus a game on a Saturday isn't natural and I'm capping this game like a bowl game at home for the lions...
0
Quote Originally Posted by JAl239:
I'm shocked that it picked the Lions to cover against Atlanta. If I remember correct the system does not take into account injuries because Nick Fairley was placed on IR and Broyles is also injured and Titus Young has been kicked off the team. Let me know if it accounts for injuries? Thanks
Bengals Saints Seahawks
Yes the program does take in account injuries which is why the Detroit offense numbers have dropped prior to the numbers they had on thanksgiving...Lions have better percentage numbers on offense but a decent defense...I will always wager on a home dog that has a higher offense percentage...plus a game on a Saturday isn't natural and I'm capping this game like a bowl game at home for the lions...
need to listen my own advise...it's just the degenerate in me I can't help it...
AFN---Your not alone.......I was on the Jets also....Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. I look forward to reading your thread. Keep up the great work.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:
need to listen my own advise...it's just the degenerate in me I can't help it...
AFN---Your not alone.......I was on the Jets also....Merry Christmas and Happy New Year. I look forward to reading your thread. Keep up the great work.
Both teams have the same numbers On defense and offense...But the niners are ranked 31 just consistency Seahawks ranked 13...Giants are ranked 32 the worst in the league and they crashed and burned last week...I expect to see the same from the niners this week ranked 31
0
Quote Originally Posted by Crashdavis565:
Seabirds?
Both teams have the same numbers On defense and offense...But the niners are ranked 31 just consistency Seahawks ranked 13...Giants are ranked 32 the worst in the league and they crashed and burned last week...I expect to see the same from the niners this week ranked 31
Lost to Minnesota...can't beat the rams and put up only 3 points against the giants game in San fran? But can go in New England and get a win?
Not bashing the pick at all but this does beg the question, are you not taking into account the fact that the examples of inconsistency you are using above were games in which the Niners were led by two different quarterbacks?
Kaepernick poses different problems for defenses than Alex Smith does, not too mention the fact the players in general seem to like him better which seems to have inspired their overall team play.
Does your system not take this into consideration? They have not lost a football game in regulation time since Kaepernick has been the starter. Surely that displays some consistency? Speaking of consistency the Seahawks despite looking brilliant at times, particularly against some very weak opponents have also lost to the Cardinals, Rams, Lions, Dolphins and ofcourse the Niners which is the only really good team on that list. They also actually did lose to the Packers on prime time at home but we won't get into what happened at the end of that game. The three games Seattle has just won in a row is their longest winning streak of the season. Until beating the slumping bears in ot and then the Cardinals and Bills, the Seahawks had not won 3 in a row all season. I would say that is pretty inconsistent unto itself.
I think it's going to be a hell of a game and not knocking the selection, I just don't get the rationale behind the inconsistency angle.
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:
Lost to Minnesota...can't beat the rams and put up only 3 points against the giants game in San fran? But can go in New England and get a win?
Not bashing the pick at all but this does beg the question, are you not taking into account the fact that the examples of inconsistency you are using above were games in which the Niners were led by two different quarterbacks?
Kaepernick poses different problems for defenses than Alex Smith does, not too mention the fact the players in general seem to like him better which seems to have inspired their overall team play.
Does your system not take this into consideration? They have not lost a football game in regulation time since Kaepernick has been the starter. Surely that displays some consistency? Speaking of consistency the Seahawks despite looking brilliant at times, particularly against some very weak opponents have also lost to the Cardinals, Rams, Lions, Dolphins and ofcourse the Niners which is the only really good team on that list. They also actually did lose to the Packers on prime time at home but we won't get into what happened at the end of that game. The three games Seattle has just won in a row is their longest winning streak of the season. Until beating the slumping bears in ot and then the Cardinals and Bills, the Seahawks had not won 3 in a row all season. I would say that is pretty inconsistent unto itself.
I think it's going to be a hell of a game and not knocking the selection, I just don't get the rationale behind the inconsistency angle.
To make it sweet and short..niners have been led by 2 different QB's for the season...kaepernick goes into New England and wins and now he has to go to Seattle and win...and in a close pickem game numbers wise I'm not backing Akers where this game is key for field goals...
0
To make it sweet and short..niners have been led by 2 different QB's for the season...kaepernick goes into New England and wins and now he has to go to Seattle and win...and in a close pickem game numbers wise I'm not backing Akers where this game is key for field goals...
To make it sweet and short..niners have been led by 2 different QB's for the season...kaepernick goes into New England and wins and now he has to go to Seattle and win...and in a close pickem game numbers wise I'm not backing Akers where this game is key for field goals...
STILL THINK 31ST IS A FAR CRY REGARDLESS OF AKERS. NOT TO MANY TEAMS OUT THERE HAVE 10 WINS AT THIS POINT AND YET THEY ARE ALMOST LAST IN CONSISTENCY? I'D SAY THEY HAVE BEEN PRETTY CONSISTENT RELATIVELY SPEAKING JUST ASK THE RAMS, CARDINALS, JETS, BILLS, BEARS, LIONS, ETC ETC ETC.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:
To make it sweet and short..niners have been led by 2 different QB's for the season...kaepernick goes into New England and wins and now he has to go to Seattle and win...and in a close pickem game numbers wise I'm not backing Akers where this game is key for field goals...
STILL THINK 31ST IS A FAR CRY REGARDLESS OF AKERS. NOT TO MANY TEAMS OUT THERE HAVE 10 WINS AT THIS POINT AND YET THEY ARE ALMOST LAST IN CONSISTENCY? I'D SAY THEY HAVE BEEN PRETTY CONSISTENT RELATIVELY SPEAKING JUST ASK THE RAMS, CARDINALS, JETS, BILLS, BEARS, LIONS, ETC ETC ETC.
Consistency is confusing when comparing to actual wins and losses...but I'm glad it records consistency as it made me look at the niners past games of the entire season...I'm not forgetting they lost to ponder...can't beat the Rams..and only put up 3 points against giants...I took SF ML last week cuz of the program numbers and I'm sticking to the program numbers for Seattle...BOL
0
Consistency is confusing when comparing to actual wins and losses...but I'm glad it records consistency as it made me look at the niners past games of the entire season...I'm not forgetting they lost to ponder...can't beat the Rams..and only put up 3 points against giants...I took SF ML last week cuz of the program numbers and I'm sticking to the program numbers for Seattle...BOL
Merry Christmas covers! program was accurate as Detroit had 555 yards but managed to lose as usual...if I was told a home dog was getting 555 yards I would take it but it was the Lions
Lets roll for Sunday
0
Quote Originally Posted by sivotco7:
bump for Sunday
Merry Christmas covers! program was accurate as Detroit had 555 yards but managed to lose as usual...if I was told a home dog was getting 555 yards I would take it but it was the Lions
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Bengals 
Hot Forum Topics
