Your avatar suits you. Good friend of mine was neighbors of Kevin James in nyc, he would tell me stories of how much of an asshat he was always calling the cops for the most ridiculous of things, thinking he should get preferential treatment for being a celebrity.
I hope you bet big on Oakland, will be the 2nd time in 2 weeks I proved your arrogant self wrong.
I asked you to prove me wrong but you never did.
Now you want to prove me wrong on a hypothetical OAK bet but you don't even want to take KC as a straight bet?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nycgags:
Your avatar suits you. Good friend of mine was neighbors of Kevin James in nyc, he would tell me stories of how much of an asshat he was always calling the cops for the most ridiculous of things, thinking he should get preferential treatment for being a celebrity.
I hope you bet big on Oakland, will be the 2nd time in 2 weeks I proved your arrogant self wrong.
I asked you to prove me wrong but you never did.
Now you want to prove me wrong on a hypothetical OAK bet but you don't even want to take KC as a straight bet?
You did the work for me. Your argument never met the burden of proof. Your 1.5 PPG is statistically insignificant and very likely was the result of increased travel time outside of the division. Why don't you post the SU results of road games within division and interconference road games? You also never qualified the first layer of the sandwich, every where I read about sandwich games it was two difficult games with a weak game in between. You assumed the layers of bread were divisional games and left at that. Furthermore you assumed the middle game was a road game, too many assumptions to cherry pick your results. Not worth my effort to prove something you can't even accurately define.
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Now you want to prove me wrong on a hypothetical OAK bet but you don't even want to take KC as a straight bet?
What does my wagering decisions have to do with proving you wrong? One is unrelated with the other.
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I asked you to prove me wrong but you never did.
You did the work for me. Your argument never met the burden of proof. Your 1.5 PPG is statistically insignificant and very likely was the result of increased travel time outside of the division. Why don't you post the SU results of road games within division and interconference road games? You also never qualified the first layer of the sandwich, every where I read about sandwich games it was two difficult games with a weak game in between. You assumed the layers of bread were divisional games and left at that. Furthermore you assumed the middle game was a road game, too many assumptions to cherry pick your results. Not worth my effort to prove something you can't even accurately define.
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
Now you want to prove me wrong on a hypothetical OAK bet but you don't even want to take KC as a straight bet?
What does my wagering decisions have to do with proving you wrong? One is unrelated with the other.
I've already placed money on KC through a teaser and I am waiting to see if there is positive line movement between now and Thursday night. I don't really see the need to overload the wager regardless just for "internet points".
0
I've already placed money on KC through a teaser and I am waiting to see if there is positive line movement between now and Thursday night. I don't really see the need to overload the wager regardless just for "internet points".
In addition to playing in the loudest stadium in the world, the Raiders will be playing in one of the coldest games in their franchise history.
Current forecast as posted last night: - Kickoff: 17°
- Half: 15°
- 4th Qtr: 13°
Wind Chill: -1° to 7°
Kansas City scores an average of 4 more points during home games in the month of December to February since 1978 and since 1960, home teams playing in 10 degrees or less have an average winning margin of 9.6 ppg.
Also, here are Carr's stats vs KC:
1-5, with 5 straight losses
Carr's stats at Arrowhead:
0-2 2 TDs 10 Sacks QB Rating of about 70 Outscored 54-30
Bet the Chiefs
of all the compelling "arguments' that I've heard for both sides, (and a great discussion it has been) this is the one that strikes me as the most pertinent to Thursday night's game time situation. I also agree with the poster that said the Chiefs need this game MUCH worse than the Raiders do (but certainly not saying the Raiders aren't motivated, BOTH these teams give it their all when they play each other). If the Raiders win, the Chiefs have basically no shot of winning the AFC West. If the Chiefs win, they move into a tie with the Raiders and would hold the tie breakers against everyone in the division moving forward. And the Chiefs have the best schedule going forward with home games vs Tennessee (off a 10 day rest) Home vs Den on Xmas night and then at SD, a team they've struggled with but consistently have beaten.
Denver is @ Tenn (a game they could easily lose)
Home vs Pats (another losable game)
@ Chiefs on Christmas
and Home vs Raiders probably won't happen but it's POSSIBLE Denver could lose all 4 of those games.
As for the Raiders:
They're at the Chargers (no gimme for sure)
Home vs a highly motivated Colt team trying to win a playoff spot
and on the road at Denver which could go either way....
0
QUOTE Originally Posted by TwoLegParlay:
In addition to playing in the loudest stadium in the world, the Raiders will be playing in one of the coldest games in their franchise history.
Current forecast as posted last night: - Kickoff: 17°
- Half: 15°
- 4th Qtr: 13°
Wind Chill: -1° to 7°
Kansas City scores an average of 4 more points during home games in the month of December to February since 1978 and since 1960, home teams playing in 10 degrees or less have an average winning margin of 9.6 ppg.
Also, here are Carr's stats vs KC:
1-5, with 5 straight losses
Carr's stats at Arrowhead:
0-2 2 TDs 10 Sacks QB Rating of about 70 Outscored 54-30
Bet the Chiefs
of all the compelling "arguments' that I've heard for both sides, (and a great discussion it has been) this is the one that strikes me as the most pertinent to Thursday night's game time situation. I also agree with the poster that said the Chiefs need this game MUCH worse than the Raiders do (but certainly not saying the Raiders aren't motivated, BOTH these teams give it their all when they play each other). If the Raiders win, the Chiefs have basically no shot of winning the AFC West. If the Chiefs win, they move into a tie with the Raiders and would hold the tie breakers against everyone in the division moving forward. And the Chiefs have the best schedule going forward with home games vs Tennessee (off a 10 day rest) Home vs Den on Xmas night and then at SD, a team they've struggled with but consistently have beaten.
Denver is @ Tenn (a game they could easily lose)
Home vs Pats (another losable game)
@ Chiefs on Christmas
and Home vs Raiders probably won't happen but it's POSSIBLE Denver could lose all 4 of those games.
As for the Raiders:
They're at the Chargers (no gimme for sure)
Home vs a highly motivated Colt team trying to win a playoff spot
and on the road at Denver which could go either way....
I was answering a comment made by one of you clowns about the cold weather, and it has been cold in the bay dummy, so if youre going to talk shi t, know your facts
0
Quote Originally Posted by Nycgags:
I was answering a comment made by one of you clowns about the cold weather, and it has been cold in the bay dummy, so if youre going to talk shi t, know your facts
These are to very good playoff teams,nfl really pushing for Oakland and we all know good things come when nfl has your back has some have said.kc coming off 2 very tough come from behind road wins.now they head home to a face a familiar foe.but Oakland is hot with revenge in sight,Carr the better qb this year and kc offense kind of stalls at times.this is not the game to stall Oakland is gonna want to run up score board ? Is can kc keep up.defense these two teams are neck and neck in total defense all kc has to their adv is home field which really is not a advantage in this league oAk undefeated on the road.kc has beaten Oakland the last 4 times while raiders were down and out well they are up now and will be ready.kc will not sweep 1 team in this division but oak might with that high power offense and sub par defense.game should be exciting should as I thought Denver vs Oakland would have been closer but it wasn't.
0
These are to very good playoff teams,nfl really pushing for Oakland and we all know good things come when nfl has your back has some have said.kc coming off 2 very tough come from behind road wins.now they head home to a face a familiar foe.but Oakland is hot with revenge in sight,Carr the better qb this year and kc offense kind of stalls at times.this is not the game to stall Oakland is gonna want to run up score board ? Is can kc keep up.defense these two teams are neck and neck in total defense all kc has to their adv is home field which really is not a advantage in this league oAk undefeated on the road.kc has beaten Oakland the last 4 times while raiders were down and out well they are up now and will be ready.kc will not sweep 1 team in this division but oak might with that high power offense and sub par defense.game should be exciting should as I thought Denver vs Oakland would have been closer but it wasn't.
Justin Houston being back is HUGE.... having 2 excellent edge rushers is a big advantage in any game.. the Raiders NEED to avoid 3rd and anything greater than 6yd situations in this game at all costs.. because an amped up stadium plus those pass rushers having their ears pinned back could spell doom..
0
Justin Houston being back is HUGE.... having 2 excellent edge rushers is a big advantage in any game.. the Raiders NEED to avoid 3rd and anything greater than 6yd situations in this game at all costs.. because an amped up stadium plus those pass rushers having their ears pinned back could spell doom..
So weather and the drunk fans win this game? Ok got it
Who said the fans had to be drunk? Sober is acceptable..
I think the Chiefs win because I believe their better.. I of course could be wrong.. it has happen before.. I think the Raiders are a very good team, sky's the limit for them.. just see the Chiefs being more complete st the moment
0
Quote Originally Posted by RaiderNation925:
So weather and the drunk fans win this game? Ok got it
Who said the fans had to be drunk? Sober is acceptable..
I think the Chiefs win because I believe their better.. I of course could be wrong.. it has happen before.. I think the Raiders are a very good team, sky's the limit for them.. just see the Chiefs being more complete st the moment
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
