Falcons scare me..Sub in dallas at +9.5....Alex Smith is who we thought he is
Why do the Falcons scare you? Matty ice is MUCH better at home and the Rams suck on the road. After losing to the saints week 1 wont they be out for blood this week?
Hard to go against the Cheifs at this point. Their Defense is looking fierce! Granted they played Jax probably the worst squad in the nfl but still..
Also Arrowhead is a tough place to play for opposing teams.
Having said all that I still think Dallas is the superior team and in a spot to win here if Romo is healthy.
I wish I could get them at +10 instead of +9.5 then I would take them. I wish you could by pints for a single team within a teaser!
Thanks for your input!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hawkman425:
Falcons scare me..Sub in dallas at +9.5....Alex Smith is who we thought he is
Why do the Falcons scare you? Matty ice is MUCH better at home and the Rams suck on the road. After losing to the saints week 1 wont they be out for blood this week?
Hard to go against the Cheifs at this point. Their Defense is looking fierce! Granted they played Jax probably the worst squad in the nfl but still..
Also Arrowhead is a tough place to play for opposing teams.
Having said all that I still think Dallas is the superior team and in a spot to win here if Romo is healthy.
I wish I could get them at +10 instead of +9.5 then I would take them. I wish you could by pints for a single team within a teaser!
Raiders. Hard to cap the 'Dust Bowl'.. both teams are awful, anything can happen
Haha the Dust Bowl very funny.
I just thought since the Raiders were able to hang with Indy in their dome, was very impressive. Raiders D and running game was very impressive. Jacksonville is probably the worst team in the leaugue. Look what KC did to them..
I appreciate your input.
0
Quote Originally Posted by twolves41:
Raiders. Hard to cap the 'Dust Bowl'.. both teams are awful, anything can happen
Haha the Dust Bowl very funny.
I just thought since the Raiders were able to hang with Indy in their dome, was very impressive. Raiders D and running game was very impressive. Jacksonville is probably the worst team in the leaugue. Look what KC did to them..
I love your picks. Your stinker may be the Vikes. Bears defense could put a hurting on Ponder. I don't like Ponder though.
Saints may be the better play for you. Saints +4
BOL
I like the Vikes with 2 td's here because they are always a very tough road team. They are the one team I have noticed that historically upsets. I've been burned bad by betting against the Vikes as road dogs in the past. I will not make that mistake again here. Plus 2 words Adrain Peterson. I don't see how the Bears win by more than 2 td's?? If I teased the bears down to a pk I could see the Vikes winning outright.
Thanks for your input
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigSully74:
I love your picks. Your stinker may be the Vikes. Bears defense could put a hurting on Ponder. I don't like Ponder though.
Saints may be the better play for you. Saints +4
BOL
I like the Vikes with 2 td's here because they are always a very tough road team. They are the one team I have noticed that historically upsets. I've been burned bad by betting against the Vikes as road dogs in the past. I will not make that mistake again here. Plus 2 words Adrain Peterson. I don't see how the Bears win by more than 2 td's?? If I teased the bears down to a pk I could see the Vikes winning outright.
Nobody thinks the Falcons will go 0-2...Rams play well indoors..+Roddy is Gimpy and rams got a Good Defense. I think Falcons win but Rams have a shot.
I dont see Kc winning by more than a fg let alone a TD. Dallas keeps it close.
Romo is way better than Gabbert , I think its the better play but BOL either way man.. Like the saints teased to +3.5 too...
Good points here. Rams do play well indoors. Rams are supposed to have a good D but they looked weak against a bad Zona offense.
I agree with your Dallas pick except that KC has a very good D and they are playing in Arrowhead so that scares me a little. Yes the Dallas offense is much better than Jax no question there.
Thanks much for your input buddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hawkman425:
Nobody thinks the Falcons will go 0-2...Rams play well indoors..+Roddy is Gimpy and rams got a Good Defense. I think Falcons win but Rams have a shot.
I dont see Kc winning by more than a fg let alone a TD. Dallas keeps it close.
Romo is way better than Gabbert , I think its the better play but BOL either way man.. Like the saints teased to +3.5 too...
Good points here. Rams do play well indoors. Rams are supposed to have a good D but they looked weak against a bad Zona offense.
I agree with your Dallas pick except that KC has a very good D and they are playing in Arrowhead so that scares me a little. Yes the Dallas offense is much better than Jax no question there.
I like your Falcons play. Too many people dumping stock into STL too early.
Great points here I agree. I'm not sold on the Raiders either but they are playing the worst team in the leauge the Jaguars who wont even have their starting qb this game! Its more about betting against the Jax the suck bad and Raiders are looking pretty good anyway to take care of the light work here.
0
Quote Originally Posted by drostephens:
Still not sold on the Raiders.
I like your Falcons play. Too many people dumping stock into STL too early.
Great points here I agree. I'm not sold on the Raiders either but they are playing the worst team in the leauge the Jaguars who wont even have their starting qb this game! Its more about betting against the Jax the suck bad and Raiders are looking pretty good anyway to take care of the light work here.
I love your picks. Your stinker may be the Vikes. Bears defense could put a hurting on Ponder. I don't like Ponder though.
Saints may be the better play for you. Saints +4
BOL
Problem is Saints a very different team outside the superdome. I've been burned bad backing the saints on the road in the past. I just can't take that chance with them. I can only back them in their dome.
0
Quote Originally Posted by BigSully74:
I love your picks. Your stinker may be the Vikes. Bears defense could put a hurting on Ponder. I don't like Ponder though.
Saints may be the better play for you. Saints +4
BOL
Problem is Saints a very different team outside the superdome. I've been burned bad backing the saints on the road in the past. I just can't take that chance with them. I can only back them in their dome.
bears could win by 3 tds I rather take the bears for the win instead of giving 14 to vikings. Stay away from cowboys chiefs either of those teams could win by 10 points.
0
bears could win by 3 tds I rather take the bears for the win instead of giving 14 to vikings. Stay away from cowboys chiefs either of those teams could win by 10 points.
Why are you betting teasers on so many division games? These are the hardest to cap IMO. I wouldn't trust Oakland in any teaser, especially only at +1.
Like your Detroit bet.
0
Why are you betting teasers on so many division games? These are the hardest to cap IMO. I wouldn't trust Oakland in any teaser, especially only at +1.
I might ditch Oakland consesus mostly points at this one. I think I got high up on Oakland after they hung around with Colts in Indy. But maybe the Colts are not as good as everyone thinks and it doesnt mean that much. I didn't like the +1 anyway. I always try to hit key numbers.
I think people are down on New England becuase they almost lost to the Bills. But people are underestimating how much better the Bills are this year. I watched that whole game. Bills are a different team this year. NE at home against a crappy Jets team should win by at least a TD. I just don't see that Jets offense doing much at all. NE D is very good against the run and Jets have no passing game.
I like Green bay and Philly. Philly looked awesome last night! RG3 is very rusty Green bay almost beat SF at home too.
0
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
Throw away two.... New England and Oakland.
Substitute.... Green Bay and Philly,
then you have a winner.
I might ditch Oakland consesus mostly points at this one. I think I got high up on Oakland after they hung around with Colts in Indy. But maybe the Colts are not as good as everyone thinks and it doesnt mean that much. I didn't like the +1 anyway. I always try to hit key numbers.
I think people are down on New England becuase they almost lost to the Bills. But people are underestimating how much better the Bills are this year. I watched that whole game. Bills are a different team this year. NE at home against a crappy Jets team should win by at least a TD. I just don't see that Jets offense doing much at all. NE D is very good against the run and Jets have no passing game.
I like Green bay and Philly. Philly looked awesome last night! RG3 is very rusty Green bay almost beat SF at home too.
Ravens are bad also....I can see the Browns beating them
GL
I just dont see how the Jets hang around with the Pats on this one.
The browns offense is atrocious! They may have a good D but they are definitely outmatched here. The Ravens D will eat up this rookie up their improved pass rush. Big difference between Manning and Weedon at qb.
I guess the Vikes could lose by more than 2 td's ....
0
Quote Originally Posted by slick15:
Pats win by 3
Vikings are bad...They can lose by 21
Ravens are bad also....I can see the Browns beating them
GL
I just dont see how the Jets hang around with the Pats on this one.
The browns offense is atrocious! They may have a good D but they are definitely outmatched here. The Ravens D will eat up this rookie up their improved pass rush. Big difference between Manning and Weedon at qb.
I guess the Vikes could lose by more than 2 td's ....
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
