Big card for this week 17 and I brought back the writeups this week. Wow can you believe it is Week 17 already??
Green Bay -4
The line is a complete overreaction.
Even if the Packers do rest their starters they have very capable
backups. Aaron Rogers has been in the system for about 3 years now
and knows the playbook inside out. Also he was very impressive when
he had to sub for Farve in the Dallas game when he got injured. The
Pack are also pretty deep at RB, WR and TE and I think the backups
will be able to handle this soft Lions defense. The Lions offense has
dried up as the season has gone on especially with the loss of Roy
Williams and the pathetic play of the offensive line. I expect most
of the Packers defense to play at least a half and they should be
able to have their way with this pathetic line, especially Aaron
Kampman who dominated in the first meeting between these two.
I also
think this line is too low because of the beating the Packers took
last week and the Lions win. The odds of that happening again this
week and pretty darn small. The Packers coach is a smart dude and he
does not want to go into the playoffs on a losing note, he is going
to want to build a lot of confidence especially with such a young
team with many players making their first trip to the postseason. I
think the Lions are done, they got their win last week to shut
everyone up and I think they will be ready to go home for the
offseason even before this game begins, their minds will be on the
bus. Quite frankly I think their defense has had their minds on the
offseason for a few weeks. They Lions have given up an average of 424
yards a game in their last 5 games, jesus they gave up over 400 yards
to the frikkin Cheifs last week on their home turf!!
Indianapolis +7 (-120)
I bought the hook on this one earlier
when it was +6.5 . Just like Green Bay I think this is another
overreaction to the backups playing. Even before the backups play I
think Peyton and the first team offense will get in a few series
especially if the grumblings are true that Marvin Harrison may play
as the Colts would like to get him in some game action before the
postseason starts. Even when the first team offense sits down I think
the Colts are in capable hands with Jim Sorgi. Hahaha laugh all you
want but the guy is all you want in a backup. He has played well the
last few times he's played and he knows the offense inside out as he
has been with the team for many years. The backups RB's for the Colts
are also capable backs. Clifton Dawson has been getting more reps in
practice and scored a TD last week and we all saw earlier in the year
what Kenton Keith can do.
On the defensive side the Colts are
pretty deep as well. Let's not forget a lot of Indy's defensive
starters have been banged up and have sat out the last 2 games. Rahim
Brock, Robert Mathis and Antoine Bethea haven't played for 2 weeks
and the backups have played darn well holding the Raiders to just 14
points and last week they held the Texans offense (which is better
than the Titans' offense) to just 7 points heading into the 4th
quarter. And quite honestly guys I would take Jim Sorgi over Vince
Young and even moreso when you consider Home/Away. Vince Young has
been terrible this year and I don't see how he is going to beat the
Colts in Indy by over 7 points. The Titans have only beat 2 teams by
over 7 points all year on the road and they were the Chiefs (yuck)
and the Saints (back in Week 3 when the Saints offense was extinct).
I also think these Colts, backups or not, would love nothing more
than to deny a division rival a postseason berth. It also doesn't
hurt that Tony Dungy is good friends with browns coach Romeo Crennel
and he might like to give his good buddy a shot at the playoffs.
There are two overlooked injuries this week for the Titans also.
Rookie safety Micheal Griffin who has played pretty well this seasn
is likely out and starting Center Kevin Mawae and the veteran leader
of that Titans offense isn't expected to play. He didn't play last
week either and Vince Young had trouble with the exchange from the
backup as he fumbled 3 times.
Tampa Bay +3
Yet again another overreaction to
backups playing. Jeff Garcia probably won't play at all but backup QB
Luke McCown knows the offense very well and he was steallar earlier
in the year filling in for Garcia when he was injured and just last
week when Garcia was pulled he almost lead the Bucs back to tie the
game only if the reciever had come down with his feet in bounds on
the 2 point conversion attempt. Even if Earnest Graham sits for the
Bucs there really isn't much dropoff with 2nd and 3rd
string guys Micheal Pittman and Micheal Bennett who bring similar
styles as Graham. I'm not into the Panthers QB's either. Matt Moore
has not played well with a 59 QB rating and 1 TD pass in 9 games and
rookie quarterbacks always struggle against the Tampa 2 Cover D. Same
story with the backup defenders for Tampa Bay, there really isn't too
much of a dropoff, most of the starters are veteran guys and the
backups are younger guys who might actually bring a little more
energy and spark. Tampa Bay is 6-1 at home this year and their only
loss was by 1 point to Jacksonville. Carolina is no Jacksonville.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Big card for this week 17 and I brought back the writeups this week. Wow can you believe it is Week 17 already??
Green Bay -4
The line is a complete overreaction.
Even if the Packers do rest their starters they have very capable
backups. Aaron Rogers has been in the system for about 3 years now
and knows the playbook inside out. Also he was very impressive when
he had to sub for Farve in the Dallas game when he got injured. The
Pack are also pretty deep at RB, WR and TE and I think the backups
will be able to handle this soft Lions defense. The Lions offense has
dried up as the season has gone on especially with the loss of Roy
Williams and the pathetic play of the offensive line. I expect most
of the Packers defense to play at least a half and they should be
able to have their way with this pathetic line, especially Aaron
Kampman who dominated in the first meeting between these two.
I also
think this line is too low because of the beating the Packers took
last week and the Lions win. The odds of that happening again this
week and pretty darn small. The Packers coach is a smart dude and he
does not want to go into the playoffs on a losing note, he is going
to want to build a lot of confidence especially with such a young
team with many players making their first trip to the postseason. I
think the Lions are done, they got their win last week to shut
everyone up and I think they will be ready to go home for the
offseason even before this game begins, their minds will be on the
bus. Quite frankly I think their defense has had their minds on the
offseason for a few weeks. They Lions have given up an average of 424
yards a game in their last 5 games, jesus they gave up over 400 yards
to the frikkin Cheifs last week on their home turf!!
Indianapolis +7 (-120)
I bought the hook on this one earlier
when it was +6.5 . Just like Green Bay I think this is another
overreaction to the backups playing. Even before the backups play I
think Peyton and the first team offense will get in a few series
especially if the grumblings are true that Marvin Harrison may play
as the Colts would like to get him in some game action before the
postseason starts. Even when the first team offense sits down I think
the Colts are in capable hands with Jim Sorgi. Hahaha laugh all you
want but the guy is all you want in a backup. He has played well the
last few times he's played and he knows the offense inside out as he
has been with the team for many years. The backups RB's for the Colts
are also capable backs. Clifton Dawson has been getting more reps in
practice and scored a TD last week and we all saw earlier in the year
what Kenton Keith can do.
On the defensive side the Colts are
pretty deep as well. Let's not forget a lot of Indy's defensive
starters have been banged up and have sat out the last 2 games. Rahim
Brock, Robert Mathis and Antoine Bethea haven't played for 2 weeks
and the backups have played darn well holding the Raiders to just 14
points and last week they held the Texans offense (which is better
than the Titans' offense) to just 7 points heading into the 4th
quarter. And quite honestly guys I would take Jim Sorgi over Vince
Young and even moreso when you consider Home/Away. Vince Young has
been terrible this year and I don't see how he is going to beat the
Colts in Indy by over 7 points. The Titans have only beat 2 teams by
over 7 points all year on the road and they were the Chiefs (yuck)
and the Saints (back in Week 3 when the Saints offense was extinct).
I also think these Colts, backups or not, would love nothing more
than to deny a division rival a postseason berth. It also doesn't
hurt that Tony Dungy is good friends with browns coach Romeo Crennel
and he might like to give his good buddy a shot at the playoffs.
There are two overlooked injuries this week for the Titans also.
Rookie safety Micheal Griffin who has played pretty well this seasn
is likely out and starting Center Kevin Mawae and the veteran leader
of that Titans offense isn't expected to play. He didn't play last
week either and Vince Young had trouble with the exchange from the
backup as he fumbled 3 times.
Tampa Bay +3
Yet again another overreaction to
backups playing. Jeff Garcia probably won't play at all but backup QB
Luke McCown knows the offense very well and he was steallar earlier
in the year filling in for Garcia when he was injured and just last
week when Garcia was pulled he almost lead the Bucs back to tie the
game only if the reciever had come down with his feet in bounds on
the 2 point conversion attempt. Even if Earnest Graham sits for the
Bucs there really isn't much dropoff with 2nd and 3rd
string guys Micheal Pittman and Micheal Bennett who bring similar
styles as Graham. I'm not into the Panthers QB's either. Matt Moore
has not played well with a 59 QB rating and 1 TD pass in 9 games and
rookie quarterbacks always struggle against the Tampa 2 Cover D. Same
story with the backup defenders for Tampa Bay, there really isn't too
much of a dropoff, most of the starters are veteran guys and the
backups are younger guys who might actually bring a little more
energy and spark. Tampa Bay is 6-1 at home this year and their only
loss was by 1 point to Jacksonville. Carolina is no Jacksonville.
Yep lotta road chalk but honestly I
think this one will be over by halftime. Philip Rivers probably won't
even have to throw the ball (thank god), because the Chargers have 3
runningbacks that could be starters on most teams in the league (LT,
Turner and Sproles) and an offensive line that in recent weeks has
played like they did last year, just shoving guys around and being
real physically dominating. Those backs + this offensive line + an
Oakland run defense that gives up a fucking absurd 4.9 YPC on the
season and 5.2 YPC over the last 3 games = big trouble. I think San
Diego will run run run all day long and this game will be short and
sweet for the Chargers.
I should also mention that San Diego
has won 8 straight over Oakland and are currently on a 5 game winning
streak overall. Actually the main reason they have won 4 in a row is
because their defense is fully healthy and is playing like they did
last year. During the 5 game win streak they have only given up 11.6
PPG. I'd really be shocked if the Oakland offense managed more than
10 points in this one. First of all they are playing this great
defense, Justin Fargas is out and the rookie JaMarcus Russell is
starting. This same Oakland crew started last week and except for 8
points scored in garbage time they are raped. Russell was just god
awful he finished 7-23 for 83 yards, 1TD and 3 INT, and that TD came
in garbage time and he should easily have been picked 5 times at
least. The Jags defenders dropped 2 easy picks that were right in
their hands. I think he actually threw it to the defense more than
his own guys. Bottomline is I think the Chargers roll in a quick, low
scoring game. Which is why I like the Under in this one as well.
Denver +3
I don't really know why Minnesota is
laying road chalk in this one. Sure they have something to play for
but they aren't really that good. A lot of it has to do with Adrian
Peterson who just hasn't looked the same since his injury and he has
been incredibly bad in his last 3 games when opposing teams have
stacked the box and forced Tavaris Jackson to try to beat them which
he hasn't. This kid is not going to beat this Denver secondary which
is has 2 of the best corners in the league and with Jackson usually
throwing a few wild jump balls every game I'd expect a few to be
picked off in this one by the Broncos. The bad Denver rush defense
has also improved of late giving up just 3.7 YPC to opposing backs in
their last 3 games which is pretty good. Denver was embarrassed last
week and the Chargers were making fun of Jay Cutler, the Broncos were
fired up this week talking about that. Expect them to come out and
play spoiler and close the season strong.
0
San Diego -8
Yep lotta road chalk but honestly I
think this one will be over by halftime. Philip Rivers probably won't
even have to throw the ball (thank god), because the Chargers have 3
runningbacks that could be starters on most teams in the league (LT,
Turner and Sproles) and an offensive line that in recent weeks has
played like they did last year, just shoving guys around and being
real physically dominating. Those backs + this offensive line + an
Oakland run defense that gives up a fucking absurd 4.9 YPC on the
season and 5.2 YPC over the last 3 games = big trouble. I think San
Diego will run run run all day long and this game will be short and
sweet for the Chargers.
I should also mention that San Diego
has won 8 straight over Oakland and are currently on a 5 game winning
streak overall. Actually the main reason they have won 4 in a row is
because their defense is fully healthy and is playing like they did
last year. During the 5 game win streak they have only given up 11.6
PPG. I'd really be shocked if the Oakland offense managed more than
10 points in this one. First of all they are playing this great
defense, Justin Fargas is out and the rookie JaMarcus Russell is
starting. This same Oakland crew started last week and except for 8
points scored in garbage time they are raped. Russell was just god
awful he finished 7-23 for 83 yards, 1TD and 3 INT, and that TD came
in garbage time and he should easily have been picked 5 times at
least. The Jags defenders dropped 2 easy picks that were right in
their hands. I think he actually threw it to the defense more than
his own guys. Bottomline is I think the Chargers roll in a quick, low
scoring game. Which is why I like the Under in this one as well.
Denver +3
I don't really know why Minnesota is
laying road chalk in this one. Sure they have something to play for
but they aren't really that good. A lot of it has to do with Adrian
Peterson who just hasn't looked the same since his injury and he has
been incredibly bad in his last 3 games when opposing teams have
stacked the box and forced Tavaris Jackson to try to beat them which
he hasn't. This kid is not going to beat this Denver secondary which
is has 2 of the best corners in the league and with Jackson usually
throwing a few wild jump balls every game I'd expect a few to be
picked off in this one by the Broncos. The bad Denver rush defense
has also improved of late giving up just 3.7 YPC to opposing backs in
their last 3 games which is pretty good. Denver was embarrassed last
week and the Chargers were making fun of Jay Cutler, the Broncos were
fired up this week talking about that. Expect them to come out and
play spoiler and close the season strong.
See my San Diego writeup above.
Bottomline is I'd be shocked if the Oakland offense managed over 10
points and I think San Diego will run run run which will run run run
the time off the clock.
Cincinnati/Miami UNDER 46.5
Another benefit of locking lines up
early as this one is now down to 45. I think this total is high
because of the perceived Cincinnati good offense + bad defense = high
scoring games philosophy. I've been saying for weeks that this has
changed with the Bengals and it's mainly due to the improved play of
the defense. Ever since the loss in Buffalo the Bengals defense has
played pretty well and if you exclude the Arizona game where Arizona
got 2 defensive touchdowns (not the defense's fault) the Bengals are
4-2 and they have given up 7, 6, 24, 10, 20 and 14 points in those
games. That's an average of just 13.5 per game which is damn good.
The Cincy offense has also really slowed down and I think a lot of it
is because they don't have to put up 40 to win anymore because of the
improved play of the defense, they are now more of a ball control
offense and are running it a lot more. Miami's offense has struggled
all season and offensively they probably won't put up too many
points. The Miami defense has played well as of late as well holding
Baltimore to just 16 and they played well against the high powered
Pats in new England last week, Brady got pretty frustrated in the 2nd
half as the Pats were shutout.
Kansas City/NY Jets OVER 34
I'm not really sure why this total is
so low, the weather is expected to be good and we have 2 bad
defenses. It's probably because of some of the weak play we have seen
from these 2 offenses this season but it's usually the play of the
defense that dictates totals. And in this matchup we have 2 weak
defenses and more importantly 2 defenses that are really bad against
the run and that's important because both of these offenses love to
run the ball. Look for a lot of rushing yards in this one and this
game should go over the total. Remember 34 points is not very many at
all and low totals usually go over more than half the time and when
you factor in variables such as defensive and special teams plays
this game should go over.
As Always BOL To Everyone and Their
Plays this week!!
0
San Diego/Oakland UNDER 42.5
See my San Diego writeup above.
Bottomline is I'd be shocked if the Oakland offense managed over 10
points and I think San Diego will run run run which will run run run
the time off the clock.
Cincinnati/Miami UNDER 46.5
Another benefit of locking lines up
early as this one is now down to 45. I think this total is high
because of the perceived Cincinnati good offense + bad defense = high
scoring games philosophy. I've been saying for weeks that this has
changed with the Bengals and it's mainly due to the improved play of
the defense. Ever since the loss in Buffalo the Bengals defense has
played pretty well and if you exclude the Arizona game where Arizona
got 2 defensive touchdowns (not the defense's fault) the Bengals are
4-2 and they have given up 7, 6, 24, 10, 20 and 14 points in those
games. That's an average of just 13.5 per game which is damn good.
The Cincy offense has also really slowed down and I think a lot of it
is because they don't have to put up 40 to win anymore because of the
improved play of the defense, they are now more of a ball control
offense and are running it a lot more. Miami's offense has struggled
all season and offensively they probably won't put up too many
points. The Miami defense has played well as of late as well holding
Baltimore to just 16 and they played well against the high powered
Pats in new England last week, Brady got pretty frustrated in the 2nd
half as the Pats were shutout.
Kansas City/NY Jets OVER 34
I'm not really sure why this total is
so low, the weather is expected to be good and we have 2 bad
defenses. It's probably because of some of the weak play we have seen
from these 2 offenses this season but it's usually the play of the
defense that dictates totals. And in this matchup we have 2 weak
defenses and more importantly 2 defenses that are really bad against
the run and that's important because both of these offenses love to
run the ball. Look for a lot of rushing yards in this one and this
game should go over the total. Remember 34 points is not very many at
all and low totals usually go over more than half the time and when
you factor in variables such as defensive and special teams plays
this game should go over.
As Always BOL To Everyone and Their
Plays this week!!
Craig Nall. Was a Packer for a few seasons, highly touted by Mike Sherman since he was in high school, never panned out really. Went to Buffalo as a #2 last year, then was cut by them this year and re-signed by GB after Rodgers had a hammy injury.
BOL! Like the over in the KC/NYJ game!
0
Craig Nall. Was a Packer for a few seasons, highly touted by Mike Sherman since he was in high school, never panned out really. Went to Buffalo as a #2 last year, then was cut by them this year and re-signed by GB after Rodgers had a hammy injury.
I'm not a Lions backer, but Donald Driver, Greg Jennings and Charles Woodson are all inactive this week for Green Bay. As well, Rodgers is injured and when Brett comes out, which he will, Craig Nall will be replacing him instead. Again, not necessarily on the Lions going into Lambeau, but with these guys out, it is certainly possible there could be an upset here. Kitna predicted a 10 win season and if they can get to 8 - 8 on the year, he won't be laughed at nearly as much. Just a thought on that game.
Manning will play one or two quarters and that's it, basically. This is just, as you said, to Harrison probably playing. I like the pick, may play it myself.
Other than that, best of luck.
0
I'm not a Lions backer, but Donald Driver, Greg Jennings and Charles Woodson are all inactive this week for Green Bay. As well, Rodgers is injured and when Brett comes out, which he will, Craig Nall will be replacing him instead. Again, not necessarily on the Lions going into Lambeau, but with these guys out, it is certainly possible there could be an upset here. Kitna predicted a 10 win season and if they can get to 8 - 8 on the year, he won't be laughed at nearly as much. Just a thought on that game.
Manning will play one or two quarters and that's it, basically. This is just, as you said, to Harrison probably playing. I like the pick, may play it myself.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.