It's a lot of juice I know, but still kind of a no-brainer to me. He'll go in the Top 10.
sportsbook.com
I can't see any reason to draft this guy in the first round. He is way over hyped and will fall just like Rodgers and Quinn.
I can't see any reason to draft this guy in the first round. He is way over hyped and will fall just like Rodgers and Quinn.
I can't see any reason to draft this guy in the first round. He is way over hyped and will fall just like Rodgers and Quinn.
Aaron Rodgers is a poor example on your part considering he's EASILY the best Qb in that class that year that all those teams passed on him.
I personally think Mark Sanchez is the best pro ready qb in the draft.
I can't see any reason to draft this guy in the first round. He is way over hyped and will fall just like Rodgers and Quinn.
Aaron Rodgers is a poor example on your part considering he's EASILY the best Qb in that class that year that all those teams passed on him.
I personally think Mark Sanchez is the best pro ready qb in the draft.
Aaron Rodgers is a poor example on your part considering he's EASILY the best Qb in that class that year that all those teams passed on him.
I personally think Mark Sanchez is the best pro ready qb in the draft.
Aaron Rodgers is a poor example on your part considering he's EASILY the best Qb in that class that year that all those teams passed on him.
I personally think Mark Sanchez is the best pro ready qb in the draft.
Thanks. I see alot of talk on him being a smoke screen. He might be better than Stafford or he might not but only one year of real numbers on him, plus a weak arm means I think it is all talk on Sanchez. somebody might trade up into the bottom of the first round to get him but I just don't see him going in the top ten.
Detroit (Culpepper), Tampa Bay (Leftwich), Denver (Ortonr) and other teams that need a QB have some veteran presence that doesn't deem it is necessary to draft a QB. In fact, next year's QB class - Snead, Bradford, McCoy, Tebow is much better than this one and I would just deal with what I have and not shell out $30 million in guaranteed money for a guy that is likely 1 in 3 chance of making it.
Thanks. I see alot of talk on him being a smoke screen. He might be better than Stafford or he might not but only one year of real numbers on him, plus a weak arm means I think it is all talk on Sanchez. somebody might trade up into the bottom of the first round to get him but I just don't see him going in the top ten.
Detroit (Culpepper), Tampa Bay (Leftwich), Denver (Ortonr) and other teams that need a QB have some veteran presence that doesn't deem it is necessary to draft a QB. In fact, next year's QB class - Snead, Bradford, McCoy, Tebow is much better than this one and I would just deal with what I have and not shell out $30 million in guaranteed money for a guy that is likely 1 in 3 chance of making it.
Thanks. I see alot of talk on him being a smoke screen. He might be better than Stafford or he might not but only one year of real numbers on him, plus a weak arm means I think it is all talk on Sanchez. somebody might trade up into the bottom of the first round to get him but I just don't see him going in the top ten.
Detroit (Culpepper), Tampa Bay (Leftwich), Denver (Ortonr) and other teams that need a QB have some veteran presence that doesn't deem it is necessary to draft a QB. In fact, next year's QB class - Snead, Bradford, McCoy, Tebow is much better than this one and I would just deal with what I have and not shell out $30 million in guaranteed money for a guy that is likely 1 in 3 chance of making it.
Sanchez has a weak arm?
Thanks. I see alot of talk on him being a smoke screen. He might be better than Stafford or he might not but only one year of real numbers on him, plus a weak arm means I think it is all talk on Sanchez. somebody might trade up into the bottom of the first round to get him but I just don't see him going in the top ten.
Detroit (Culpepper), Tampa Bay (Leftwich), Denver (Ortonr) and other teams that need a QB have some veteran presence that doesn't deem it is necessary to draft a QB. In fact, next year's QB class - Snead, Bradford, McCoy, Tebow is much better than this one and I would just deal with what I have and not shell out $30 million in guaranteed money for a guy that is likely 1 in 3 chance of making it.
Sanchez has a weak arm?
Sanchez has a weak arm?
In comparison to Stafford and Freeman... yes - or at least that is what has been mentioned on the radio by the talking heads.
also there is a correlation b/n starts in college and success in the pros
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2006/college-quarterbacks-through-prism-statistics
Sanchez has a weak arm?
In comparison to Stafford and Freeman... yes - or at least that is what has been mentioned on the radio by the talking heads.
also there is a correlation b/n starts in college and success in the pros
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2006/college-quarterbacks-through-prism-statistics
Thanks. I see alot of talk on him being a smoke screen. He might be better than Stafford or he might not but only one year of real numbers on him, plus a weak arm means I think it is all talk on Sanchez. somebody might trade up into the bottom of the first round to get him but I just don't see him going in the top ten.
Detroit (Culpepper), Tampa Bay (Leftwich), Denver (Ortonr) and other teams that need a QB have some veteran presence that doesn't deem it is necessary to draft a QB. In fact, next year's QB class - Snead, Bradford, McCoy, Tebow is much better than this one and I would just deal with what I have and not shell out $30 million in guaranteed money for a guy that is likely 1 in 3 chance of making it.
I think McCoy might be the best of next years bunch ...
I would Love to see Tebow on the Bills Sidelines even as a Runner in the QB Run offesne
Thanks. I see alot of talk on him being a smoke screen. He might be better than Stafford or he might not but only one year of real numbers on him, plus a weak arm means I think it is all talk on Sanchez. somebody might trade up into the bottom of the first round to get him but I just don't see him going in the top ten.
Detroit (Culpepper), Tampa Bay (Leftwich), Denver (Ortonr) and other teams that need a QB have some veteran presence that doesn't deem it is necessary to draft a QB. In fact, next year's QB class - Snead, Bradford, McCoy, Tebow is much better than this one and I would just deal with what I have and not shell out $30 million in guaranteed money for a guy that is likely 1 in 3 chance of making it.
I think McCoy might be the best of next years bunch ...
I would Love to see Tebow on the Bills Sidelines even as a Runner in the QB Run offesne
In comparison to Stafford and Freeman... yes - or at least that is what has been mentioned on the radio by the talking heads.
also there is a correlation b/n starts in college and success in the pros
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2006/college-quarterbacks-through-prism-statistics
compared to those guys, sure, but to say he has a weak arm is ridiculous. You're comparing him to two gun slingers. Thats like saying Randy Johnson has a weak arm, comparing him to Clemens and Nolan Ryan.
In comparison to Stafford and Freeman... yes - or at least that is what has been mentioned on the radio by the talking heads.
also there is a correlation b/n starts in college and success in the pros
https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stat-analysis/2006/college-quarterbacks-through-prism-statistics
compared to those guys, sure, but to say he has a weak arm is ridiculous. You're comparing him to two gun slingers. Thats like saying Randy Johnson has a weak arm, comparing him to Clemens and Nolan Ryan.
compared to those guys, sure, but to say he has a weak arm is ridiculous. You're comparing him to two gun slingers. Thats like saying Randy Johnson has a weak arm, comparing him to Clemens and Nolan Ryan.
Last time I checked most organizations were comparing him to stafford and freeman as a potential 1st rounder - thus, he as a weak arm when in comparison - is it weaker compared to all the starters in the NFL no idea but in a competition b/n the three he has a weak arm.
compared to those guys, sure, but to say he has a weak arm is ridiculous. You're comparing him to two gun slingers. Thats like saying Randy Johnson has a weak arm, comparing him to Clemens and Nolan Ryan.
Last time I checked most organizations were comparing him to stafford and freeman as a potential 1st rounder - thus, he as a weak arm when in comparison - is it weaker compared to all the starters in the NFL no idea but in a competition b/n the three he has a weak arm.
Last time I checked most organizations were comparing him to stafford and freeman as a potential 1st rounder - thus, he as a weak arm when in comparison - is it weaker compared to all the starters in the NFL no idea but in a competition b/n the three he has a weak arm.
Glad you're clarifying "what you meant."
Last time I checked most organizations were comparing him to stafford and freeman as a potential 1st rounder - thus, he as a weak arm when in comparison - is it weaker compared to all the starters in the NFL no idea but in a competition b/n the three he has a weak arm.
Glad you're clarifying "what you meant."
I think McCoy might be the best of next years bunch ...
I would Love to see Tebow on the Bills Sidelines even as a Runner in the QB Run offesne
I think McCoy might be the best of next years bunch ...
I would Love to see Tebow on the Bills Sidelines even as a Runner in the QB Run offesne
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.