Sean McVay at home on Primetime with a healthy Squad and under a fg looks so tasty and EZ right
? The line is indicating 2me of a Dolphins upset. We'll 
if I'm right about the line again tonight hahaha 
YTD 42-29
UNDER medium 
stacks
Rams + under lightweight stacks
BOL. I had this game as a pick'em before the week, I don't see all the easy Rams win stuff. They beat and didn't cover vs a bad Raiders team, caught the Vikings at their worse time, and took an OT game to beat the the Seahawks. Dolphins cover the 6 and had a chance last week vs the Bills who are killing everyone, and Cardinals game they were going to win and ended up losing by 1 point. Bills and Cardinals compare to Raiders, Vikings and Seahawks is huge. Although maybe people that think Rams are easy money aren't looking into the actual teams they beat and the fact the Dolphins have been putting up 27 points since Tua returned. I like your picks, everyone and their mama on the over, I too think this game will be a shoot out, so Under in that sense seem to be money. I lean Dolphins but Rams do have a nice offensive stack with Kupp, Nacua and Williams stack with Stafford, their WR 3, 4 ,5 are also nice, I just do not trust their D, and Stafford always good for a few picks.
you had this game correct my friend, under was a sweet call, but the Rams were just not who we think they are after 3 weeks. Dolphins on the other hand played some good teams. Some say the NFL is rigged but this game had most of the writing on the wall.
just love talking football!!
@MRxKrazz
Yes, the writing on the wall was that baiting Rams @ home -2.5 fishing line hahaha. Everybody played the over thinking of a shootout and Wisemen gave them red zone stop for 8 field goals instead hahaha.
The Wisemen line tells you a lot if you're able to decipher it hahaha. "Dolphins upset" Just called it like I it again
I truly believe line read is a BIG PART of the game. Not 100% of the process but close to 30-35% of the correct process. If we go over all the games this past week.
BAL -6, under a TD spread will have people betting that -6, CIN covers.
SF -6.5, CMC back, TB have no Evans and Godwin, people were jumping at this SF -6.5, TB covers.
WAS -2.5, Rookie QB playing at home off a 2.5 line, HA I liked this WAS game myself, PIT covers and WIN!
MIN -7, SunShine out at QB, Mac Jones in JAC already a sorry football team, -7 should be easy, JAC covers.
LAR -2.5, MIA sucks, can't win with TUA back playing, Rams are red hot, but -2.5 at home, MIA covers and WIN!
DET -3.5, we all saw the HOU team lose to the NYJ, can't score, getting sacked left and right, of course HOU covers the HOOK!
Its not 100% of the time, but these line reads is a bigger factor than most want to admit.
Of course there are the PHI -7, and they covered easily! The BUF -4 who should have NOT covered if Flacco can just not turn the ball over. So nothing everything is 100%, finding the right team to BET and WIN might not be easy, but finding the game and team to stay away from shouldn't be HARD!
BTW I like what I see from you
@2goodhahaha
Keep up the great work, and never change! Although not sure why you played the Rams when you knew!
@MRxKrazz
You totally get it and I'm not surprised
You've been around and doing this sports capping for a long time. So your above explanation and observation are spot on
. I can't explain it any better
.
Sure hope the non-believer and newbies saw and read your post #17 to give them a better idea of how Wiseman lines and the capping game works.
As for the Eagles and Bills covered. Both the Cowgirls and Colts were playing home and the Cowgirls have a ridiculous amount of delusional fanbase to keep balance out the bet moneys. So I wasn't surprised the Eagles covered. It's the heavy Colts backing that got me scratching my head. Old ass QB, no Pittman, playing a hot Bills team that could cover the low line easily 
Established in 1995,
on your plays 
Hot Forum Topics
