i just flat out dont understand this line. how are these teams evenly matched in this situation? the saints are 10-0 and the pats are 7-3 with all 3 losses coming on the road, 2 of them to teams that are no where near as good as the saints. in fact the pats should have lost to baltimore at home so they easily could be 6-4 from a capping stand point. baltimore dropped a wide open pass on 4th down that would have gave them first and goal from the 2 to win. even the loss to indy was because they couldnt stop manning in the 4th quarter, there is no doubt in my mind if they punted manning still would have marched down the field and won. the pats are very good but they are not as good as the 16-0 team, and quite frankly the saints look that good. ill have to pay to see somone out score this team in their own house on monday night. saint also need to keep winning to stay ahead of minny for home field. saints 30 pats 24
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
37-37 on the year...
NEW ORLEANS SAINTS -1
i just flat out dont understand this line. how are these teams evenly matched in this situation? the saints are 10-0 and the pats are 7-3 with all 3 losses coming on the road, 2 of them to teams that are no where near as good as the saints. in fact the pats should have lost to baltimore at home so they easily could be 6-4 from a capping stand point. baltimore dropped a wide open pass on 4th down that would have gave them first and goal from the 2 to win. even the loss to indy was because they couldnt stop manning in the 4th quarter, there is no doubt in my mind if they punted manning still would have marched down the field and won. the pats are very good but they are not as good as the 16-0 team, and quite frankly the saints look that good. ill have to pay to see somone out score this team in their own house on monday night. saint also need to keep winning to stay ahead of minny for home field. saints 30 pats 24
I think you make a good call here Bad. Show me a more tenacious
quarterback than Brees (ok Payton). He refuse's to lose, and wills his
team to victory.
I'm with you on this tonite!
0
I think you make a good call here Bad. Show me a more tenacious
quarterback than Brees (ok Payton). He refuse's to lose, and wills his
team to victory.
nice arguement but this point you make is the one I can't seem to shake....
"... just flat out dont understand this line. how are these teams evenly matched in this situation? the saints are 10-0 and the pats are 7-3 with all 3 losses coming on the road, 2 of them to teams that are no where near as good as the saints. "
sometimes the line is telling you something....Saints seem like an obvious play, talent better, offense on fire, at home, great record yet they ar 1 point favrite.....this logic does not always work but percent wise when you bet the line not whjat makes sense you win more.....thats my experience at least.
0
nice arguement but this point you make is the one I can't seem to shake....
"... just flat out dont understand this line. how are these teams evenly matched in this situation? the saints are 10-0 and the pats are 7-3 with all 3 losses coming on the road, 2 of them to teams that are no where near as good as the saints. "
sometimes the line is telling you something....Saints seem like an obvious play, talent better, offense on fire, at home, great record yet they ar 1 point favrite.....this logic does not always work but percent wise when you bet the line not whjat makes sense you win more.....thats my experience at least.
nice arguement but this point you make is the one I can't seem to shake....
"... just flat out dont understand this line. how are these teams evenly matched in this situation? the saints are 10-0 and the pats are 7-3 with all 3 losses coming on the road, 2 of them to teams that are no where near as good as the saints. "
sometimes the line is telling you something....Saints seem like an obvious play, talent better, offense on fire, at home, great record yet they ar 1 point favrite.....this logic does not always work but percent wise when you bet the line not whjat makes sense you win more.....thats my experience at least.
the line opened at -3 louis, what i meant was im surprised there has been so much new england money to bet it down
0
Quote Originally Posted by Louis_IV:
nice arguement but this point you make is the one I can't seem to shake....
"... just flat out dont understand this line. how are these teams evenly matched in this situation? the saints are 10-0 and the pats are 7-3 with all 3 losses coming on the road, 2 of them to teams that are no where near as good as the saints. "
sometimes the line is telling you something....Saints seem like an obvious play, talent better, offense on fire, at home, great record yet they ar 1 point favrite.....this logic does not always work but percent wise when you bet the line not whjat makes sense you win more.....thats my experience at least.
the line opened at -3 louis, what i meant was im surprised there has been so much new england money to bet it down
I am disappointed in this post. I often look at what 4 or 5 of you guys bring to the table for research, and take into consideration. I am already locked in on this game though, last week. Pats +3, and 1H +1. What i am disappointed about is that your assessment is off, and i am surprised. Referring to the Pats 3 losses, is an awful way to make an assessment. All 3 of them the Pats were winning at halftime, all on the road. 1st 2 (NYJ and Den) was during Brady's "recovery time", and after Denver he got back to full strength and accuracy. The 3rd loss, well, that is well documented and disputed, so not getting into that.
What you need to do is look at matchups. Look at who NO beat. Best QB he might have faced this year is Eli Manning. Brady is a weeee bit better than Eli.
Now i can see NO winning, i can see NE winning, but shears matchups, and the fact that the Pats have allowed the least amount of Offensive points on DEF (2nd overall if including DEF/ST), and the inability of Saints DEF to stop the long (Moss), mid (Welker) & short (Faulk) passing games of the HOFer QB Brady, and Belichik doesn't make same mistake twice.
Oh by the way, after a long career, Faulk is finally playing a home game, and very inspired leader....
Pats 35-31.
Yes, i am a Pats fan, but consider Pats 1H +1, as the top play, since i do not believe Pats have been losing at halftime since Game 1 versus BUFF. GL my friend...
0
I am disappointed in this post. I often look at what 4 or 5 of you guys bring to the table for research, and take into consideration. I am already locked in on this game though, last week. Pats +3, and 1H +1. What i am disappointed about is that your assessment is off, and i am surprised. Referring to the Pats 3 losses, is an awful way to make an assessment. All 3 of them the Pats were winning at halftime, all on the road. 1st 2 (NYJ and Den) was during Brady's "recovery time", and after Denver he got back to full strength and accuracy. The 3rd loss, well, that is well documented and disputed, so not getting into that.
What you need to do is look at matchups. Look at who NO beat. Best QB he might have faced this year is Eli Manning. Brady is a weeee bit better than Eli.
Now i can see NO winning, i can see NE winning, but shears matchups, and the fact that the Pats have allowed the least amount of Offensive points on DEF (2nd overall if including DEF/ST), and the inability of Saints DEF to stop the long (Moss), mid (Welker) & short (Faulk) passing games of the HOFer QB Brady, and Belichik doesn't make same mistake twice.
Oh by the way, after a long career, Faulk is finally playing a home game, and very inspired leader....
Pats 35-31.
Yes, i am a Pats fan, but consider Pats 1H +1, as the top play, since i do not believe Pats have been losing at halftime since Game 1 versus BUFF. GL my friend...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
......dumbest post of the day right here......but, it is early, so you could get overtaken. 
GL badlands
Hot Forum Topics
