All Forums | NFL Betting

***Monday Night Football***

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 40522
Posts: 61
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2004
Posts: 17267
Posted: #1

1-1-1 yesterday.....Monday night:

 

 

New Orleans/San Francisco "under" 43.5 (-110)

 

 

good luck

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2008
Posts: 16675
Posted: #2
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 1795
Posted: #3
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2006
Posts: 1757
Posted: #4

 I Like It No Lean To Anyside?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2007
Posts: 1462
Posted: #5
I like it......UNDER IT IS
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2009
Posts: 621
Posted: #6
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2766
Posted: #7
Rush I think your wrong here. Saints on the road are gonna look to score. SF will be able to move the ball.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2766
Posted: #8
You had the Over last night right?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2766
Posted: #9
Also to if Vegas thought that SF controls this game for the under why would Vegas have the total in the 40s? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2009
Posts: 10748
Posted: #10
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5105
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by veto22:

Also to if Vegas thought that SF controls this game for the under why would Vegas have the total in the 40s? 
this is the lowest saint total in long time
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 5516
Posted: #12

Quote Originally Posted by veto22:

Rush I think your wrong here. Saints on the road are gonna look to score. SF will be able to move the ball.

 

wouldnt they look to score no matter where they are ... under is a solid play tonight. 

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2007
Posts: 25135
Posted: #13
like it rush, gl
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2001
Posts: 13368
Posted: #14
hmmm
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 2766
Posted: #15
wouldnt they look to score no matter where they are ... under is a solid play tonight.

No, week one vs Minny they shut it down.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 187
Posted: #16
what do you think about the side, rush?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4754
Posted: #17
I would lean the under before I would pick a side.  NO would be more than happy to just win. SF needs a win.  I''m sure Singletary is stressing to Smith to not give the game away. I see running on both sides.  GL Rush!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2005
Posts: 1554
Posted: #18
is there any reason behind your under pick? without reason behind your pick this blog is the same as the other 500 people on here that just say take over or under or a team. facts are what helps people win and too many people on this site just say take this or that.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 250
Posted: #19
Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddydago8:

is there any reason behind your under pick? without reason behind your pick this blog is the same as the other 500 people on here that just say take over or under or a team. facts are what helps people win and too many people on this site just say take this or that.


Someone gives you a steak and you want them to cut it for you too.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2010
Posts: 86
Posted: #20

SF couldn't score last week against a lower calaiber defense, granted it was week 1, but don't see them being in this game for long so IMHO you just have to worry about Drew going nutz. I like the play as the dramatic amount of public love has scared me off NO.

BOL,

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 589
Posted: #21

Quote Originally Posted by bigdaddydago8:

is there any reason behind your under pick? without reason behind your pick this blog is the same as the other 500 people on here that just say take over or under or a team. facts are what helps people win and too many people on this site just say take this or that.

What is wrong with people? Why must everyone be spoonfed? There is no need for anyone to put a reasoning to their pick.

Just take the pick or don't. He has his reasoning and maybe he doesn't want to divulge. Maybe he doesn't have the time. Just take it for what it's worth. I'm sure you have gone through 40 other posts and 20 say UN and 20 say OV. Do you take all that reasoning and stick it into a computer and out comes a pick?

DON'T BE A FOOL ... If you don't like it, then go somewhere else. Stop taking up space and making stupid a-s comments

Question: If someone went 14-1 over the weekend, would you start asking them why they picked who they did? Or if they went 0-9, would you ask their reasoning?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2009
Posts: 2684
Posted: #22
I think many people are going off of just last weeks performance.  New Orleans could score this by themselves.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 1738
Posted: #23
just follow rushs weekday college football plays and youll need no explanation
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 3041
Posted: #24
Think you got the right side. BOL.
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 14861
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by rush:

1-1-1 yesterday.....Monday night: New Orleans/San Francisco "under" 43.5 (-110) good luck

I picked NO and over in league, and Im thinking unders now as you!  Minn and NO score was 14 - 9  UNDER, and I won by 1, Bought the hook!, and SF/Seatle score was Seahawks 31-6 Unders also, and the SF D will play better this week! BOL tonight rush!!    PG

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.