Aaron's the same, but when you put a great QB behind a bad OL, you get an average QB..
Add to that the GB WR's aren't getting any separation early after the snap. If you noticed the pack are only getting completions on plays where Rodgers scrambles for his life and hits some one well over 7 seconds after the snap. That's not planned
0
Quote Originally Posted by YouWish:
Aaron's the same, but when you put a great QB behind a bad OL, you get an average QB..
Add to that the GB WR's aren't getting any separation early after the snap. If you noticed the pack are only getting completions on plays where Rodgers scrambles for his life and hits some one well over 7 seconds after the snap. That's not planned
Loving the card, with exception of SEA. For some reason, I just see this game being decided by a FG
I dont think SEA will win by 30+ plays double digits is totally possible, stop AP force Teddy to throw and just dont turn the ball over to MIN is the recipe to beat them.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Ih8coldweather:
Loving the card, with exception of SEA. For some reason, I just see this game being decided by a FG
I dont think SEA will win by 30+ plays double digits is totally possible, stop AP force Teddy to throw and just dont turn the ball over to MIN is the recipe to beat them.
Aaron's the same, but when you put a great QB behind a bad OL, you get an average QB..
I have lost with GB few time this year, Great QB plays great no matter what, there are a few throws the ARRON of the past would have made, I am not sure if there are some injuries GB and ARRON is holding out on, I know losing JORDY was BIG, they were without JORDY for 5 weeks to start the season as well, something else is going on.
0
Quote Originally Posted by YouWish:
Aaron's the same, but when you put a great QB behind a bad OL, you get an average QB..
I have lost with GB few time this year, Great QB plays great no matter what, there are a few throws the ARRON of the past would have made, I am not sure if there are some injuries GB and ARRON is holding out on, I know losing JORDY was BIG, they were without JORDY for 5 weeks to start the season as well, something else is going on.
Lynch played first six games too, and Seattle went 2-4.
Lynch was not the problem, problem was JIMMY G. Now that SEA have finally found their style of play again, having BEAST MODE eating skittles is the cherry on the top, too bad RAWLS got hurt.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mancity:
Lynch played first six games too, and Seattle went 2-4.
Lynch was not the problem, problem was JIMMY G. Now that SEA have finally found their style of play again, having BEAST MODE eating skittles is the cherry on the top, too bad RAWLS got hurt.
Add to that the GB WR's aren't getting any separation early after the snap. If you noticed the pack are only getting completions on plays where Rodgers scrambles for his life and hits some one well over 7 seconds after the snap. That's not planned
It been a few games or half a season with this problem, Slants with COBB? Drags routes? Adams and Jones no doubt are slow and doesn't beat their CB's but to not find any open WR's to me a bad game planning and Bad QB play, like that RED ZONE INT if he would have threw it outside, might have been 6 points.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
Add to that the GB WR's aren't getting any separation early after the snap. If you noticed the pack are only getting completions on plays where Rodgers scrambles for his life and hits some one well over 7 seconds after the snap. That's not planned
It been a few games or half a season with this problem, Slants with COBB? Drags routes? Adams and Jones no doubt are slow and doesn't beat their CB's but to not find any open WR's to me a bad game planning and Bad QB play, like that RED ZONE INT if he would have threw it outside, might have been 6 points.
With you on all 4 plays Mrxkrazz, love the favs here.
Taking all favs and road favs are normally a bad recipes, of the few very bad weeks I had, most were when I was on favs and road favs, but this week, one just got to take the hotter team, and the better team.
0
Quote Originally Posted by worthbob:
With you on all 4 plays Mrxkrazz, love the favs here.
Taking all favs and road favs are normally a bad recipes, of the few very bad weeks I had, most were when I was on favs and road favs, but this week, one just got to take the hotter team, and the better team.
Taking all favs and road favs are normally a bad recipes, of the few very bad weeks I had, most were when I was on favs and road favs, but this week, one just got to take the hotter team, and the better team.
Are you calling Pitt the "hotter team"? After what happen at Balt. & Cleve?
0
Quote Originally Posted by MRxKrazz:
Taking all favs and road favs are normally a bad recipes, of the few very bad weeks I had, most were when I was on favs and road favs, but this week, one just got to take the hotter team, and the better team.
Are you calling Pitt the "hotter team"? After what happen at Balt. & Cleve?
Are you calling Pitt the "hotter team"? After what happen at Balt. & Cleve?
Yes, I am calling PIT the hotter team after even the BAL game, and CLE game, divisional games aren't easy no matter the level of the team, STL sort of CREAMED the SEA team that crushed the ARI team that the SF team beat this past week in OT.
My only concern is D Williams, without him, PIT will now be a one dimensional team without the threat on the ground.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tahoejoe2:
Are you calling Pitt the "hotter team"? After what happen at Balt. & Cleve?
Yes, I am calling PIT the hotter team after even the BAL game, and CLE game, divisional games aren't easy no matter the level of the team, STL sort of CREAMED the SEA team that crushed the ARI team that the SF team beat this past week in OT.
My only concern is D Williams, without him, PIT will now be a one dimensional team without the threat on the ground.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.