Your average gambler doesn't understand the value of defense and special teams...Seattle has both advantages over New Orleans big time...Home team doesn't hurt also...Yes, New Orleans has the better QB no question right now not that Wilson sucks, and Payton is a better coach then Pete C. Seahawks(and SF) are like an old school team in the modern era of the NFL. That being said, it's going to be in the rain....I'd much rather have Wilson and Lynch and Seattle's defense in that then NO. Seahawks lead the NFL in + turnover's. Honestly New Orleans +8 isn't an awful play, but be careful. I'm saying Seahawks 23-14.
Your average gambler doesn't understand the value of defense and special teams...Seattle has both advantages over New Orleans big time...Home team doesn't hurt also...Yes, New Orleans has the better QB no question right now not that Wilson sucks, and Payton is a better coach then Pete C. Seahawks(and SF) are like an old school team in the modern era of the NFL. That being said, it's going to be in the rain....I'd much rather have Wilson and Lynch and Seattle's defense in that then NO. Seahawks lead the NFL in + turnover's. Honestly New Orleans +8 isn't an awful play, but be careful. I'm saying Seahawks 23-14.
Your average gambler doesn't understand the value of defense and special teams...Seattle has both advantages over New Orleans big time...Home team doesn't hurt also...Yes, New Orleans has the better QB no question right now not that Wilson sucks, and Payton is a better coach then Pete C. Seahawks(and SF) are like an old school team in the modern era of the NFL. That being said, it's going to be in the rain....I'd much rather have Wilson and Lynch and Seattle's defense in that then NO. Seahawks lead the NFL in + turnover's. Honestly New Orleans +8 isn't an awful play, but be careful. I'm saying Seahawks 23-14.
Your average gambler doesn't understand the value of defense and special teams...Seattle has both advantages over New Orleans big time...Home team doesn't hurt also...Yes, New Orleans has the better QB no question right now not that Wilson sucks, and Payton is a better coach then Pete C. Seahawks(and SF) are like an old school team in the modern era of the NFL. That being said, it's going to be in the rain....I'd much rather have Wilson and Lynch and Seattle's defense in that then NO. Seahawks lead the NFL in + turnover's. Honestly New Orleans +8 isn't an awful play, but be careful. I'm saying Seahawks 23-14.
Your average gambler doesn't understand the value of defense and special teams...Seattle has both advantages over New Orleans big time...Home team doesn't hurt also...Yes, New Orleans has the better QB no question right now not that Wilson sucks, and Payton is a better coach then Pete C. Seahawks(and SF) are like an old school team in the modern era of the NFL. That being said, it's going to be in the rain....I'd much rather have Wilson and Lynch and Seattle's defense in that then NO. Seahawks lead the NFL in + turnover's. Honestly New Orleans +8 isn't an awful play, but be careful. I'm saying Seahawks 23-14.
Your average gambler doesn't understand the value of defense and special teams...Seattle has both advantages over New Orleans big time...Home team doesn't hurt also...Yes, New Orleans has the better QB no question right now not that Wilson sucks, and Payton is a better coach then Pete C. Seahawks(and SF) are like an old school team in the modern era of the NFL. That being said, it's going to be in the rain....I'd much rather have Wilson and Lynch and Seattle's defense in that then NO. Seahawks lead the NFL in + turnover's. Honestly New Orleans +8 isn't an awful play, but be careful. I'm saying Seahawks 23-14.
I'm looking at a couple of trends.
First, Brees has been pure gold after a relatively poor performance. The last twenty-one times Brees has had a passer rating of under 80.0 (last week against Philly) he has rebounded with a SUP and ATS win twenty times - that's ATS 20-1 and SUP 20-1.
Of late the divisional round has been a good round to play dogs going ATS 18-10 since 2006. I think the team coming off a playoff win in many instances has a little more mojo than the home team who is coming off a bye and might be a bit rusty.
Teams that win 7 or more home games in the regular season and then face a team they beat in the regular season in the divisional round are 2-7 ATS and only 5-4 SUP. I think if you back a dominant home team in the playoffs at home you will be betting into an over inflated line. I also think that teams looking for inseason revenge will have a slight motivational and tactical advantage over their opponents.
I think the Saints have the pedigree at QB and coaching to get some things done in Seattle. I'm stepping up an playing the SAINTS +8 today.
Good luck going forward.
I'm looking at a couple of trends.
First, Brees has been pure gold after a relatively poor performance. The last twenty-one times Brees has had a passer rating of under 80.0 (last week against Philly) he has rebounded with a SUP and ATS win twenty times - that's ATS 20-1 and SUP 20-1.
Of late the divisional round has been a good round to play dogs going ATS 18-10 since 2006. I think the team coming off a playoff win in many instances has a little more mojo than the home team who is coming off a bye and might be a bit rusty.
Teams that win 7 or more home games in the regular season and then face a team they beat in the regular season in the divisional round are 2-7 ATS and only 5-4 SUP. I think if you back a dominant home team in the playoffs at home you will be betting into an over inflated line. I also think that teams looking for inseason revenge will have a slight motivational and tactical advantage over their opponents.
I think the Saints have the pedigree at QB and coaching to get some things done in Seattle. I'm stepping up an playing the SAINTS +8 today.
Good luck going forward.
you guys are funny. NOrleans simply cannot line up with this team. They are dominated at almost every position, especially on defense.
Don't be silly.
you guys are funny. NOrleans simply cannot line up with this team. They are dominated at almost every position, especially on defense.
Don't be silly.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.