the public does win sometimes, true. wouldn't that be too easy - always bet against the public!
I actually think Green Bay is ripe to get beat by two touchdowns or more. Cutler managed to do something twice this year he hasn't done before: win on the road in primetime.
Cutler will be ready for this game and all Chicago needs is for Aaron Rodgers to drop back down to Earth. I predict heavy, heavy pressure for Rodgers. Wouldn't be surprised if he leaves the game with another head injury. Cutler has been concussive lately as well, but Chicago historically has the top 3 or 4 home advantages in all of football - it's those winter games in Soldier Field that do it I suppose.
Chicago will not come close to losing this game folks. I've never seen Culter play a better game than he did yesterday - running for those touchdowns. I'm from Denver and have been waiting for this guy to shine. Sunday will be his moment. They're gonna pump him full of insulin and he'll be flying!
CHICAGO has only beaten 1 team by 14 n thats MINNE. there is no way they r gonna beat GB by 14. also your talking bout cutler like he's a GOD all of a sudden. HE PLAYED the HAWKs! who doesnt have a great home game against the HAWKS? n u wanna talk bout the packers record? they had a whole bunch of injuries, n those injuries did have a major impact on the way the team played. i jus dont know how anyone could trust this bears team with a quarterback who is playing mediocre and its his 2nd game in the post season. the pressure is gonna get to cutler n he is gonna B TURNING the ball OVER. u best BET ON THAT. GB 4 the WIN!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Anent:
the public does win sometimes, true. wouldn't that be too easy - always bet against the public!
I actually think Green Bay is ripe to get beat by two touchdowns or more. Cutler managed to do something twice this year he hasn't done before: win on the road in primetime.
Cutler will be ready for this game and all Chicago needs is for Aaron Rodgers to drop back down to Earth. I predict heavy, heavy pressure for Rodgers. Wouldn't be surprised if he leaves the game with another head injury. Cutler has been concussive lately as well, but Chicago historically has the top 3 or 4 home advantages in all of football - it's those winter games in Soldier Field that do it I suppose.
Chicago will not come close to losing this game folks. I've never seen Culter play a better game than he did yesterday - running for those touchdowns. I'm from Denver and have been waiting for this guy to shine. Sunday will be his moment. They're gonna pump him full of insulin and he'll be flying!
CHICAGO has only beaten 1 team by 14 n thats MINNE. there is no way they r gonna beat GB by 14. also your talking bout cutler like he's a GOD all of a sudden. HE PLAYED the HAWKs! who doesnt have a great home game against the HAWKS? n u wanna talk bout the packers record? they had a whole bunch of injuries, n those injuries did have a major impact on the way the team played. i jus dont know how anyone could trust this bears team with a quarterback who is playing mediocre and its his 2nd game in the post season. the pressure is gonna get to cutler n he is gonna B TURNING the ball OVER. u best BET ON THAT. GB 4 the WIN!
I see the Pack winning this game by a fg thus seeing the home team getting 3.5 pts having ALOT of value.... Although some of the comments in this thread seem a bit ridiculous (Chi by 17pts...) I would not be surprised at all if they have this game was tied up going to the final seconds.... GB wins it by a FG and goes on to the Superbowl.... GB 23 CHI 20
0
I see the Pack winning this game by a fg thus seeing the home team getting 3.5 pts having ALOT of value.... Although some of the comments in this thread seem a bit ridiculous (Chi by 17pts...) I would not be surprised at all if they have this game was tied up going to the final seconds.... GB wins it by a FG and goes on to the Superbowl.... GB 23 CHI 20
BOL BIGEAST..IAM ON PITT ML AND THE BEARS...WAITING FOR THE BEARS LINE TO GO UP SO HAVE NOT BET IT YET...ALSO LIKE THE UNDER IN THAT GAME AS THE LAST 6 HAVE GONE UNDER ...THIS YEAR THE TWO TEAMS COMBINED FOR ONLY 50 PTS IN TWO GAMES...I SEE THE SAME THING THIS WEEK...THERE FOR VALUE IN THE DOGG IF THIS IS A UNDER GAME...
0
BOL BIGEAST..IAM ON PITT ML AND THE BEARS...WAITING FOR THE BEARS LINE TO GO UP SO HAVE NOT BET IT YET...ALSO LIKE THE UNDER IN THAT GAME AS THE LAST 6 HAVE GONE UNDER ...THIS YEAR THE TWO TEAMS COMBINED FOR ONLY 50 PTS IN TWO GAMES...I SEE THE SAME THING THIS WEEK...THERE FOR VALUE IN THE DOGG IF THIS IS A UNDER GAME...
Don't be too surprised to see the GB-3.5 reverse course starting about Friday, and closing close to a PK
I refuse to decide on this game until I see the end result of the line changes. I'm a die hard Bears fan, but I frequently bet against my team if that seems like th right side.
0
Don't be too surprised to see the GB-3.5 reverse course starting about Friday, and closing close to a PK
I refuse to decide on this game until I see the end result of the line changes. I'm a die hard Bears fan, but I frequently bet against my team if that seems like th right side.
I see the Pack winning this game by a fg thus seeing the home team getting 3.5 pts having ALOT of value.... Although some of the comments in this thread seem a bit ridiculous (Chi by 17pts...) I would not be surprised at all if they have this game was tied up going to the final seconds.... GB wins it by a FG and goes on to the Superbowl.... GB 23 CHI 20
Since when is .5 points off a line A LOT of value?
Anyway, good luck Bee.
0
Quote Originally Posted by jrhdgolf9:
I see the Pack winning this game by a fg thus seeing the home team getting 3.5 pts having ALOT of value.... Although some of the comments in this thread seem a bit ridiculous (Chi by 17pts...) I would not be surprised at all if they have this game was tied up going to the final seconds.... GB wins it by a FG and goes on to the Superbowl.... GB 23 CHI 20
Since when is .5 points off a line A LOT of value?
who cares, he threw for over 200 yrds n won the game by 7! plus chicago didnt rest starters in week 17. also gb's last 2 games where at home. heres a tip for next time, do some RESEARCH b4 you open up your mouth, because based on your memory it seems as if u dont even watch the NFL!
Actually, I've been too busy this year to watch many of the games. But, ironically, I've had by far my best year of betting in the NFL. Have you ever been wrong in an area of knowledge you're pretty good at?
Don't confuse a post that contained a location error with the fact the Chicago will win this game. I realize that' I'll look the fool if I'm wrong, but I am so convinced of this outcome, I'm willing to look the fool. And, by the way, I HAVE NEVER MADE THIS BOLD OF A CLAIM in my entire history of covers. This is very out of the ordinary for me. If Green Bay had opened up as dogs, I would have been much more likely to back GB. But as favorites, they will never win this game. Have you look at their list of injuries? I'm not even saying that Chicago is the better team, they're not. This prediction has nothing to do with who's better. Totally a situational pay based on what happens historically.
I believe that The Jets will win also, so 1 road team and 1 home team works. I don't believe both road teams will win, so I'm staying home with a team that has one of the best home field advantages in all of football - especially in the winter. Also, this is a play against MCDUMBASS, who traded Cutler. It will be all to fitting for Culter to win this game as an affront to the Broncos. My only concern are the interceptions. That's the only way I see Chicago losing this game - Cutler throw too many picks.
0
Quote Originally Posted by d33jay86:
who cares, he threw for over 200 yrds n won the game by 7! plus chicago didnt rest starters in week 17. also gb's last 2 games where at home. heres a tip for next time, do some RESEARCH b4 you open up your mouth, because based on your memory it seems as if u dont even watch the NFL!
Actually, I've been too busy this year to watch many of the games. But, ironically, I've had by far my best year of betting in the NFL. Have you ever been wrong in an area of knowledge you're pretty good at?
Don't confuse a post that contained a location error with the fact the Chicago will win this game. I realize that' I'll look the fool if I'm wrong, but I am so convinced of this outcome, I'm willing to look the fool. And, by the way, I HAVE NEVER MADE THIS BOLD OF A CLAIM in my entire history of covers. This is very out of the ordinary for me. If Green Bay had opened up as dogs, I would have been much more likely to back GB. But as favorites, they will never win this game. Have you look at their list of injuries? I'm not even saying that Chicago is the better team, they're not. This prediction has nothing to do with who's better. Totally a situational pay based on what happens historically.
I believe that The Jets will win also, so 1 road team and 1 home team works. I don't believe both road teams will win, so I'm staying home with a team that has one of the best home field advantages in all of football - especially in the winter. Also, this is a play against MCDUMBASS, who traded Cutler. It will be all to fitting for Culter to win this game as an affront to the Broncos. My only concern are the interceptions. That's the only way I see Chicago losing this game - Cutler throw too many picks.
You said it yourself - INJURIES!!!! Dude, it's gonna happen. Look, I'll either come back here to this thread trying not to say, "I told ya so," or I'll come back defeated, eating my words. But, I'll be back!!!!
0
Rodgers will get sacked at least 4 times, and pressured severely all day long. Take the +170 ml and thank me later!
You said it yourself - INJURIES!!!! Dude, it's gonna happen. Look, I'll either come back here to this thread trying not to say, "I told ya so," or I'll come back defeated, eating my words. But, I'll be back!!!!
I need my own thread to say I'm on Chicago? What's the title of this thread? Give me a break guys. I'm just having some fun, making a bold claim - it's called sports wagering folks! Christ, lighten up people. It's a fucking sports bet we're arguing about. I've made nothing personal out of this, but I get back personal from some of the members? Lame.
Yes, I've followed Culter since Draft day, and I have never seen him play like that before. It wasn't his best throwing day, but, given it was his first playoff game I'd say he played his best game as a pro, with the two rushing tds
0
I need my own thread to say I'm on Chicago? What's the title of this thread? Give me a break guys. I'm just having some fun, making a bold claim - it's called sports wagering folks! Christ, lighten up people. It's a fucking sports bet we're arguing about. I've made nothing personal out of this, but I get back personal from some of the members? Lame.
Yes, I've followed Culter since Draft day, and I have never seen him play like that before. It wasn't his best throwing day, but, given it was his first playoff game I'd say he played his best game as a pro, with the two rushing tds
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.