Good, because my yacht is in drydock again.
Fucking dennishopson ran it aground again in Bermuda.
Go Jets! Go Bears!
Good, because my yacht is in drydock again.
Fucking dennishopson ran it aground again in Bermuda.
Go Jets! Go Bears!
I said earlier in the week in another thread.....
I think the Pack will end on an expensive 3 or a cheap 3.5, and I think the Steelers will end on a cheap 4 or an expensive 3.5.....
GL
I said earlier in the week in another thread.....
I think the Pack will end on an expensive 3 or a cheap 3.5, and I think the Steelers will end on a cheap 4 or an expensive 3.5.....
GL
Thx
Thx
How good were they though ? They beat 3 teams with winning records:
The Pack (Despite being outgained by 100 yards, the 18 penalties, GB kicking line drives to Hester, fluke bounces)
Philly- Probably their best game of the year, were still outgained by 50 yards.
Jets- Jets outgained them by 70 yards. As a Jets fan would love another shot.
GB won 6 times vs teams with winning records including 4 straight.
Go Jets !
How good were they though ? They beat 3 teams with winning records:
The Pack (Despite being outgained by 100 yards, the 18 penalties, GB kicking line drives to Hester, fluke bounces)
Philly- Probably their best game of the year, were still outgained by 50 yards.
Jets- Jets outgained them by 70 yards. As a Jets fan would love another shot.
GB won 6 times vs teams with winning records including 4 straight.
Go Jets !
I said earlier in the week in another thread.....
I think the Pack will end on an expensive 3 or a cheap 3.5, and I think the Steelers will end on a cheap 4 or an expensive 3.5.....
GL
My local raised PIT from -3.5 (-110) to -3.5 (-115) now.
Van, who you like if Jets -2 vs Bears or Steelers -4 vs Bears in SB?
I said earlier in the week in another thread.....
I think the Pack will end on an expensive 3 or a cheap 3.5, and I think the Steelers will end on a cheap 4 or an expensive 3.5.....
GL
My local raised PIT from -3.5 (-110) to -3.5 (-115) now.
Van, who you like if Jets -2 vs Bears or Steelers -4 vs Bears in SB?
How good were they though ? They beat 3 teams with winning records:
The Pack (Despite being outgained by 100 yards, the 18 penalties, GB kicking line drives to Hester, fluke bounces)
Philly- Probably their best game of the year, were still outgained by 50 yards.
Jets- Jets outgained them by 70 yards. As a Jets fan would love another shot.
GB won 6 times vs teams with winning records including 4 straight.
Go Jets !
How good were they though ? They beat 3 teams with winning records:
The Pack (Despite being outgained by 100 yards, the 18 penalties, GB kicking line drives to Hester, fluke bounces)
Philly- Probably their best game of the year, were still outgained by 50 yards.
Jets- Jets outgained them by 70 yards. As a Jets fan would love another shot.
GB won 6 times vs teams with winning records including 4 straight.
Go Jets !
My local raised PIT from -3.5 (-110) to -3.5 (-115) now.
Van, who you like if Jets -2 vs Bears or Steelers -4 vs Bears in SB?
If you are asking me who I would bet if those games were taking place today on a neutral field....
I would think that the Jets Bears should be about a PK, and I think the Steelers should be -3 over the Bears.
But if you said that there was still a game to play for each, I would tell you that I would wait to see injuries / results to come up with those lines.
My local raised PIT from -3.5 (-110) to -3.5 (-115) now.
Van, who you like if Jets -2 vs Bears or Steelers -4 vs Bears in SB?
If you are asking me who I would bet if those games were taking place today on a neutral field....
I would think that the Jets Bears should be about a PK, and I think the Steelers should be -3 over the Bears.
But if you said that there was still a game to play for each, I would tell you that I would wait to see injuries / results to come up with those lines.
If you are asking me who I would bet if those games were taking place today on a neutral field....
I would think that the Jets Bears should be about a PK, and I think the Steelers should be -3 over the Bears.
But if you said that there was still a game to play for each, I would tell you that I would wait to see injuries / results to come up with those lines.
ok, thanks!
If you are asking me who I would bet if those games were taking place today on a neutral field....
I would think that the Jets Bears should be about a PK, and I think the Steelers should be -3 over the Bears.
But if you said that there was still a game to play for each, I would tell you that I would wait to see injuries / results to come up with those lines.
ok, thanks!
How good were they though ? They beat 3 teams with winning records:
The Pack (Despite being outgained by 100 yards, the 18 penalties, GB kicking line drives to Hester, fluke bounces)
Philly- Probably their best game of the year, were still outgained by 50 yards.
Jets- Jets outgained them by 70 yards. As a Jets fan would love another shot.
GB won 6 times vs teams with winning records including 4 straight.
Go Jets !
Not sure a team record against teams with winning records is worth much.
Thus far the team with the better record against teams with winning records is a pathetic 2-6 ATS, will it be 2-7 ATS on sunday ??
2008 it was just 4-7 ATS including Zona with a 2-6 record VS teams with winning records going 4-0 ATS and almost winning the SB .
2009 it did go 6-3 ATS, THATS 12-16 ATS Past 3 playoff seasons.
And this is why you can't just assume because something seems to make sense to you that it must work that way, here's one example of working the exact opposite of what you assume makes sense.
How good were they though ? They beat 3 teams with winning records:
The Pack (Despite being outgained by 100 yards, the 18 penalties, GB kicking line drives to Hester, fluke bounces)
Philly- Probably their best game of the year, were still outgained by 50 yards.
Jets- Jets outgained them by 70 yards. As a Jets fan would love another shot.
GB won 6 times vs teams with winning records including 4 straight.
Go Jets !
Not sure a team record against teams with winning records is worth much.
Thus far the team with the better record against teams with winning records is a pathetic 2-6 ATS, will it be 2-7 ATS on sunday ??
2008 it was just 4-7 ATS including Zona with a 2-6 record VS teams with winning records going 4-0 ATS and almost winning the SB .
2009 it did go 6-3 ATS, THATS 12-16 ATS Past 3 playoff seasons.
And this is why you can't just assume because something seems to make sense to you that it must work that way, here's one example of working the exact opposite of what you assume makes sense.
locked in two team parlay, S. carolina+ 7.5 and louisville -5, i think the ville wins by 15-20 and dont like kentucky in this spot today, think the cocks gotta real chance to take this one.
locked in two team parlay, S. carolina+ 7.5 and louisville -5, i think the ville wins by 15-20 and dont like kentucky in this spot today, think the cocks gotta real chance to take this one.
And yet they were outrushed in all 4 games they played in December. It's probably best I don't play this game.
And yet they were outrushed in all 4 games they played in December. It's probably best I don't play this game.
Not sure a team record against teams with winning records is worth much.
Thus far the team with the better record against teams with winning records is a pathetic 2-6 ATS, will it be 2-7 ATS on sunday ??
2008 it was just 4-7 ATS including Zona with a 2-6 record VS teams with winning records going 4-0 ATS and almost winning the SB .
2009 it did go 6-3 ATS, THATS 12-16 ATS Past 3 playoff seasons.
And this is why you can't just assume because something seems to make sense to you that it must work that way, here's one example of working the exact opposite of what you assume makes sense.
Good post. Interesting enough that I will check it out.
Not sure a team record against teams with winning records is worth much.
Thus far the team with the better record against teams with winning records is a pathetic 2-6 ATS, will it be 2-7 ATS on sunday ??
2008 it was just 4-7 ATS including Zona with a 2-6 record VS teams with winning records going 4-0 ATS and almost winning the SB .
2009 it did go 6-3 ATS, THATS 12-16 ATS Past 3 playoff seasons.
And this is why you can't just assume because something seems to make sense to you that it must work that way, here's one example of working the exact opposite of what you assume makes sense.
Good post. Interesting enough that I will check it out.
I like yachts
I like yachts
I missed my opportunity to post a thread with all capital letters "WRONG TEAM FAVORED, I WILL LEAVE COVERS IF THIS LOSES" (with lots of punctuation)
I missed my opportunity to post a thread with all capital letters "WRONG TEAM FAVORED, I WILL LEAVE COVERS IF THIS LOSES" (with lots of punctuation)
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.