All Forums | NFL Betting

*** NFL Sunday Ticket *** Week 15

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 55255
Posts: 130
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 370
Posted: #26
Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:

Bears aren't gonna lose to GB.

They couldn't block Chicago in the first game, made a miracle comeback.

Bears can get revenge for that and clinch the division. They're not the upstarts they were in the first game, they are now playing with a lot of confidence and that 0-8 vs GB will be a distant memory if they clinch the North vs the Pack at home. Trubisky was a little rusty last week in 1st game back but Packs D is nothing special. The only pressure on him will be the moment, not from the pass rush.

Otherwise I like the card but Bears are a big play for me this week.



Bears are missing Callahan and possibly Eddie Jackson, that's half their secondary including the slot that Rodgers can pick apart. Also Bears coming off their Super Bowl in a sense against the Rams, expended a lot of energy in that Rams game and now have to play Rodgers coming off a coach firing wanting to prove that was the right decision.

Scary game for me, I'm staying away....Bears SHOULD win, but not cover. I would not be shocked at all if the Packers won this game either. 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 5370
Posted: #27

Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

49ers +3.5 -103 (5x)

Goddamnit, I LOVE Seattle but how do you go against this guy!? lol Whats the thought process here LC?

I know Baldwin is out. I know they mauled San Fran at home few weeks back so you can go with the revenge factor but I don't know if the revenge factor really...well, factors if they don't have the talent to make that happen. I know Seattle is traveling and maybe due for a let down after the big win against Minny last week but I just can't see them letting up here against a team they should be able to control, especially in a tight playoff picture here where every win is needed. What angle are you looking at? Something other than what I mentioned?

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2018
Posts: 92
Posted: #28

Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:

Bears aren't gonna lose to GB. They couldn't block Chicago in the first game, made a miracle comeback. Bears can get revenge for that and clinch the division. They're not the upstarts they were in the first game, they are now playing with a lot of confidence and that 0-8 vs GB will be a distant memory if they clinch the North vs the Pack at home. Trubisky was a little rusty last week in 1st game back but Packs D is nothing special. The only pressure on him will be the moment, not from the pass rush. Otherwise I like the card but Bears are a big play for me this week.

 

While i am not saying you are wrong on your read, but does the Bears really anything to play for? They are 3 games ahead of others in their division so they already clinched a playoff birth and they are not gonna catch Saints or Rams for the best record in the conference

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 5370
Posted: #29

Quote Originally Posted by NYBartender:

Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

49ers +3.5 -103 (5x)
Goddamnit, I LOVE Seattle but how do you go against this guy!? lol Whats the thought process here LC? I know Baldwin is out. I know they mauled San Fran at home few weeks back so you can go with the revenge factor but I don't know if the revenge factor really...well, factors if they don't have the talent to make that happen. I know Seattle is traveling and maybe due for a let down after the big win against Minny last week but I just can't see them letting up here against a team they should be able to control, especially in a tight playoff picture here where every win is needed. What angle are you looking at? Something other than what I mentioned?

Baldwin might be playing after all. Reports are that he'll play but we'll see what the game time decision is.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 7
Posted: #30

Bartender the situation SF finds its self in this Sunday is 7- 0 ATs and 6-1 S/U since 2015

. It just occurred last weekend in the NE / Mia gm

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 1369
Posted: #31
I don't like plays that is only based on percentage.  74% Sea so it has got to be Niners tomorrow
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2018
Posts: 124
Posted: #32

the only game san fran lost ATS as a home dog was against the rams.

the only game seatle was a road favorite was at arizona and they lost.

 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Jul, 2013
Posts: 15033
Posted: #33
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

7 plays for tomorrow.

  1. Ravens -8.5 -105 (2x)
  2. Bengals -3 -115 (3x)
  3. Falcons -9.5 -108 (4x)
  4. Packers +5 -108 (5x)
  5. 49ers +3.5 -103 (5x)

  1. Ravens -2.5 / Falcons -3.5 -120 (2x)
  2. Ravens -2.5 / 49ers +10.5 -120 (3x)

NFL YTD: 97-52 ATS +73.91 Units

Like them all, LC. Good luck!
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2012
Posts: 1354
Posted: #34

Quote Originally Posted by NYBartender:

Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

49ers +3.5 -103 (5x)
Goddamnit, I LOVE Seattle but how do you go against this guy!? lol Whats the thought process here LC? I know Baldwin is out. I know they mauled San Fran at home few weeks back so you can go with the revenge factor but I don't know if the revenge factor really...well, factors if they don't have the talent to make that happen. I know Seattle is traveling and maybe due for a let down after the big win against Minny last week but I just can't see them letting up here against a team they should be able to control, especially in a tight playoff picture here where every win is needed. What angle are you looking at? Something other than what I mentioned?
Don't go against the Master.  You'd better put twice as much money on the 49ers to neutralize your Seattle bet and make a profit from the Master's pick.

 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2018
Posts: 536
Posted: #35

Been following LC as guidance the past few weeks but never copied his card and bets. Going to tail this wkd on the exact card, each unit $100 for me. We win together, we lose together - either way, mad respect!

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2014
Posts: 241
Posted: #36

Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:

7 plays for tomorrow.Ravens -8.5 -105 (2x)Bengals -3 -115 (3x)Falcons -9.5 -108 (4x)Packers +5 -108 (5x)49ers +3.5 -103 (5x)Ravens -2.5 / Falcons -3.5 -120 (2x)Ravens -2.5 / 49ers +10.5 -120 (3x)NFL YTD: 97-52 ATS +73.91 Units

I thought LC always did write ups on his 5x plays? Not that he owes anyone. He record speaks for itself .i think everyone wants his thoughts on Greenbay

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2011
Posts: 6931
Posted: #37

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2746
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by rhfactor:

Bartender the situation SF finds its self in this Sunday is 7- 0 ATs and 6-1 S/U since 2015

. It just occurred last weekend in the NE / Mia gm


Care to elaborate? I would be interested in hearing this one...
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 2984
Posted: #39

To a profitable day, LC! clover an_clap

Thanks for all you do! peace_5

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2018
Posts: 84
Posted: #40

GL all, let's hppe for a good day

 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2004
Posts: 13244
Posted: #41

Quote Originally Posted by slushie007:

Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:

Bears aren't gonna lose to GB. They couldn't block Chicago in the first game, made a miracle comeback. Bears can get revenge for that and clinch the division. They're not the upstarts they were in the first game, they are now playing with a lot of confidence and that 0-8 vs GB will be a distant memory if they clinch the North vs the Pack at home. Trubisky was a little rusty last week in 1st game back but Packs D is nothing special. The only pressure on him will be the moment, not from the pass rush. Otherwise I like the card but Bears are a big play for me this week.
Bears are missing Callahan and possibly Eddie Jackson, that's half their secondary including the slot that Rodgers can pick apart. Also Bears coming off their Super Bowl in a sense against the Rams, expended a lot of energy in that Rams game and now have to play Rodgers coming off a coach firing wanting to prove that was the right decision.Scary game for me, I'm staying away....Bears SHOULD win, but not cover. I would not be shocked at all if the Packers won this game either.

Take a look who is out on the Green Bay defense.

You learn more from losing than winning. You learn how to keep going.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2006
Posts: 3566
Posted: #42
Just gotta roll with LC reads.  Been as consistent as can be. He may lose or even sweep the board. Good luck today. 
Positive Thinking Movement
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2005
Posts: 11994
Posted: #43

an_cheers

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2016
Posts: 1972
Posted: #44
The card looks good, LC, good 

A lot of guys here need to calm down and do some thinking. LC's got a great record, but doesn't win every game. Who does?

SF got blown out in Seattle in terms of the final score, but SF and Mullens put up a lot of yards in that one, and it was an indication they're not as bad as they'd looked, which they showed the following week.

Packers own the Bears, it is absolutely plausible that they cover.

I personally have a hard time with big chalk, so in addition to these (Atl, Bal) scaring me, I have my own problems, as my approach would have me taking Vikings -8, Rams -13 (lol) and Jags -7.5. Ugh.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2746
Posted: #45
The only thing about the Packers play is that they haven’t won a single road game all season. I guess all they need to do is cover today...
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2005
Posts: 1701
Posted: #46

Quote Originally Posted by slushie007:

Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:

Bears aren't gonna lose to GB. They couldn't block Chicago in the first game, made a miracle comeback. Bears can get revenge for that and clinch the division. They're not the upstarts they were in the first game, they are now playing with a lot of confidence and that 0-8 vs GB will be a distant memory if they clinch the North vs the Pack at home. Trubisky was a little rusty last week in 1st game back but Packs D is nothing special. The only pressure on him will be the moment, not from the pass rush. Otherwise I like the card but Bears are a big play for me this week.
Bears are missing Callahan and possibly Eddie Jackson, that's half their secondary including the slot that Rodgers can pick apart. Also Bears coming off their Super Bowl in a sense against the Rams, expended a lot of energy in that Rams game and now have to play Rodgers coming off a coach firing wanting to prove that was the right decision.Scary game for me, I'm staying away....Bears SHOULD win, but not cover. I would not be shocked at all if the Packers won this game either.

 

TOTALLY agree. This will be a slugfest. IF Bears win, they sneak by with last minute FG. 

 

peace

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2018
Posts: 4201
Posted: #47

Quote Originally Posted by slushie007:

Quote Originally Posted by NutinButtLove:

Bears aren't gonna lose to GB. They couldn't block Chicago in the first game, made a miracle comeback. Bears can get revenge for that and clinch the division. They're not the upstarts they were in the first game, they are now playing with a lot of confidence and that 0-8 vs GB will be a distant memory if they clinch the North vs the Pack at home. Trubisky was a little rusty last week in 1st game back but Packs D is nothing special. The only pressure on him will be the moment, not from the pass rush. Otherwise I like the card but Bears are a big play for me this week.
Bears are missing Callahan and possibly Eddie Jackson, that's half their secondary including the slot that Rodgers can pick apart. Also Bears coming off their Super Bowl in a sense against the Rams, expended a lot of energy in that Rams game and now have to play Rodgers coming off a coach firing wanting to prove that was the right decision.Scary game for me, I'm staying away....Bears SHOULD win, but not cover. I would not be shocked at all if the Packers won this game either.

If you think the Rams game  was their Super Bowl, I don't know what to tell ya, other than you need to read some of the players comments in the lead up to this game.

The coach firing angle game was last week. It doesn't keep carrying over, and the reason they fired him is the team is playing bad. Beating the Falcons doesn't change that. Bears just dominated the best team in the conference, it wasn't even that close. 'Expended a lot of energy', lol it's not like it went to OT, they haven't had to travel and they're a young team. I don't see where you're coming from at all.

 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2017
Posts: 203
Posted: #48

Any opinion/lean on your NE Patriots?

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2017
Posts: 1827
Posted: #49
 The real question everybody should be asking is how does he arrive at his pics it is really easy to blindly follow somebody but that does not make you a better handicapper...
 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 1370
Posted: #50

GL LC an_cheers

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.