Don’t be fooled by the Seahawks close loss last week. The Seahawks, and the Seahawks without Earl Thomas are 2 completely different teams. The Rams, despite losing their top 2 WR’s in the first half, and despite throwing an interception at Seattle’s 2 yard line – still put up 468 yards, 30 first downs, and scored 33 points.
This new Seahawks team will struggle mightily against high-powered offenses. I wasn’t super down on the Seahawks entering the year after most their D left because their defense is a system similar to the Patriots, and players have excelled as they are put in schemes and positions to play well. And with Earl Thomas still orchestrating the system , they were still a formidable opponent despite losing a ton of other key defenders. Through 4 games they even held a record of 2-2 despite three of those games being on the road. As we saw last week, that all goes out the window with ET out. The Rams were 1 play away from scoring 39 points on them despite Brandin Cooks and Cooper Kupp getting knocked out early. The Raiders don’t have a great defense, but they should have an easy time going up and down the field against Seattle. Note: Decided to cut this play from 5x to 3x due to the uncertainty of the game being played in London, as there’s just too many extra variables. Either way I still like Oakland, but for slightly less.
Raiders +3 -120 (3x) +130 (1x)
Bucs +4 -123 (4x)
Jets -1.5 (3x)
Chargers PK (2x)
Texans -10 (1.5x)
Ravens -2.5 (4x)
Jags -3 (2x)
Jags TT Over 22 (1x)
Patriots -3 -125 (4x)
Bucs +10 / Jets +7 -120 (1.5x)
NFL YTD: 43-15 ATS +65.87 Units
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Oakland Raiders @ Seattle Seahawks
Don’t be fooled by the Seahawks close loss last week. The Seahawks, and the Seahawks without Earl Thomas are 2 completely different teams. The Rams, despite losing their top 2 WR’s in the first half, and despite throwing an interception at Seattle’s 2 yard line – still put up 468 yards, 30 first downs, and scored 33 points.
This new Seahawks team will struggle mightily against high-powered offenses. I wasn’t super down on the Seahawks entering the year after most their D left because their defense is a system similar to the Patriots, and players have excelled as they are put in schemes and positions to play well. And with Earl Thomas still orchestrating the system , they were still a formidable opponent despite losing a ton of other key defenders. Through 4 games they even held a record of 2-2 despite three of those games being on the road. As we saw last week, that all goes out the window with ET out. The Rams were 1 play away from scoring 39 points on them despite Brandin Cooks and Cooper Kupp getting knocked out early. The Raiders don’t have a great defense, but they should have an easy time going up and down the field against Seattle. Note: Decided to cut this play from 5x to 3x due to the uncertainty of the game being played in London, as there’s just too many extra variables. Either way I still like Oakland, but for slightly less.
not sure why but feels like a prime week for fave's to cover. only game im hesitant about is Texans. seems like a sandwich spot and dont trust Bill O Brien's lousy playcalling.
nice card this week, liking Ravens and Pats.
BOL LC
Sip on that plus money honey!
0
not sure why but feels like a prime week for fave's to cover. only game im hesitant about is Texans. seems like a sandwich spot and dont trust Bill O Brien's lousy playcalling.
First off let me say: I would love to see the Bucs win this week becuase ihave them over 6.5 RSW.... however, how come you aren’t worried about an Atlanta bounce back off a major blowout? I have noticed in recent years that “good” teams tend to bounce back the following week after getting blown out.... steelers dropped 40+ on them...
I won’t be be betting this game becuase of my futures circumstance, but a little feedback would be greatly appreciated as to why you like them so much. If you all ready discussed this somewhere else I am sorry for repetition, and if you could please direct me to that thread I thank you. Thanks again for all of your hard work and dedication to this forum.
0
First off let me say: I would love to see the Bucs win this week becuase ihave them over 6.5 RSW.... however, how come you aren’t worried about an Atlanta bounce back off a major blowout? I have noticed in recent years that “good” teams tend to bounce back the following week after getting blown out.... steelers dropped 40+ on them...
I won’t be be betting this game becuase of my futures circumstance, but a little feedback would be greatly appreciated as to why you like them so much. If you all ready discussed this somewhere else I am sorry for repetition, and if you could please direct me to that thread I thank you. Thanks again for all of your hard work and dedication to this forum.
Anyone that has backed all of the home dogs in the NFL this year would have almost as good of a record and you do.
Do you have any statistics on road favorites playing their 3rd straight road game? The Titans getting points at home where they are 2-0 from a Ravens team that is 1-2 on the road that is traveling for their 3rd straight game would seem to be a good spot for the Titans, but not when you make it a (4X) play on the Ravens. Do you have an concerns about this being the Ravens 3rd straight road game.
BOL this week!!!
0
League Capper thanks for posting.
Anyone that has backed all of the home dogs in the NFL this year would have almost as good of a record and you do.
Do you have any statistics on road favorites playing their 3rd straight road game? The Titans getting points at home where they are 2-0 from a Ravens team that is 1-2 on the road that is traveling for their 3rd straight game would seem to be a good spot for the Titans, but not when you make it a (4X) play on the Ravens. Do you have an concerns about this being the Ravens 3rd straight road game.
Oakland Raiders @ Seattle SeahawksDon’t be fooled by the Seahawks close loss last week. The Seahawks, and the Seahawks without Earl Thomas are 2 completely different teams. The Rams, despite losing their top 2 WR’s in the first half, and despite throwing an interception at Seattle’s 2 yard line – still put up 468 yards, 30 first downs, and scored 33 points. This new Seahawks team will struggle mightily against high-powered offenses. I wasn’t super down on the Seahawks entering the year after most their D left because their defense is a system similar to the Patriots, and players have excelled as they are put in schemes and positions to play well. And with Earl Thomas still orchestrating the system , they were still a formidable opponent despite losing a ton of other key defenders. Through 4 games they even held a record of 2-2 despite three of those games being on the road. As we saw last week, that all goes out the window with ET out. The Rams were 1 play away from scoring 39 points on them despite Brandin Cooks and Cooper Kupp getting knocked out early. The Raiders don’t have a great defense, but they should have an easy time going up and down the field against Seattle. Note: Decided to cut this play from 5x to 3x due to the uncertainty of the game being played in London, as there’s just too many extra variables. Either way I still like Oakland, but for slightly less.Raiders +3 -120 (3x) +130 (1x)Bucs +4 -123 (4x)Jets -1.5 (3x) Chargers PK (2x)Texans -10 (1.5x)Ravens -2.5 (4x)Jags -3 (2x)Jags TT Over 22 (1x)Patriots -3 -125 (4x)Bucs +10 / Jets +7 -120 (1.5x)NFL YTD: 43-15 ATS +65.87 Units
BOL LC I agree with 100% of these and will be playing them all except I'm adding a money line parlay Raiders/Bucs and we spoke about my 6 game card to win about 4-6K Pitt/bucs/raiders/jets/ravens/Chicago
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:
Oakland Raiders @ Seattle SeahawksDon’t be fooled by the Seahawks close loss last week. The Seahawks, and the Seahawks without Earl Thomas are 2 completely different teams. The Rams, despite losing their top 2 WR’s in the first half, and despite throwing an interception at Seattle’s 2 yard line – still put up 468 yards, 30 first downs, and scored 33 points. This new Seahawks team will struggle mightily against high-powered offenses. I wasn’t super down on the Seahawks entering the year after most their D left because their defense is a system similar to the Patriots, and players have excelled as they are put in schemes and positions to play well. And with Earl Thomas still orchestrating the system , they were still a formidable opponent despite losing a ton of other key defenders. Through 4 games they even held a record of 2-2 despite three of those games being on the road. As we saw last week, that all goes out the window with ET out. The Rams were 1 play away from scoring 39 points on them despite Brandin Cooks and Cooper Kupp getting knocked out early. The Raiders don’t have a great defense, but they should have an easy time going up and down the field against Seattle. Note: Decided to cut this play from 5x to 3x due to the uncertainty of the game being played in London, as there’s just too many extra variables. Either way I still like Oakland, but for slightly less.Raiders +3 -120 (3x) +130 (1x)Bucs +4 -123 (4x)Jets -1.5 (3x) Chargers PK (2x)Texans -10 (1.5x)Ravens -2.5 (4x)Jags -3 (2x)Jags TT Over 22 (1x)Patriots -3 -125 (4x)Bucs +10 / Jets +7 -120 (1.5x)NFL YTD: 43-15 ATS +65.87 Units
BOL LC I agree with 100% of these and will be playing them all except I'm adding a money line parlay Raiders/Bucs and we spoke about my 6 game card to win about 4-6K Pitt/bucs/raiders/jets/ravens/Chicago
Oakland Raiders @ Seattle SeahawksDon’t be fooled by the Seahawks close loss last week. The Seahawks, and the Seahawks without Earl Thomas are 2 completely different teams. The Rams, despite losing their top 2 WR’s in the first half, and despite throwing an interception at Seattle’s 2 yard line – still put up 468 yards, 30 first downs, and scored 33 points. This new Seahawks team will struggle mightily against high-powered offenses. I wasn’t super down on the Seahawks entering the year after most their D left because their defense is a system similar to the Patriots, and players have excelled as they are put in schemes and positions to play well. And with Earl Thomas still orchestrating the system , they were still a formidable opponent despite losing a ton of other key defenders. Through 4 games they even held a record of 2-2 despite three of those games being on the road. As we saw last week, that all goes out the window with ET out. The Rams were 1 play away from scoring 39 points on them despite Brandin Cooks and Cooper Kupp getting knocked out early. The Raiders don’t have a great defense, but they should have an easy time going up and down the field against Seattle. Note: Decided to cut this play from 5x to 3x due to the uncertainty of the game being played in London, as there’s just too many extra variables. Either way I still like Oakland, but for slightly less.Raiders +3 -120 (3x) +130 (1x)Bucs +4 -123 (4x)Jets -1.5 (3x) Chargers PK (2x)Texans -10 (1.5x)Ravens -2.5 (4x)Jags -3 (2x)Jags TT Over 22 (1x)Patriots -3 -125 (4x)Bucs +10 / Jets +7 -120 (1.5x)NFL YTD: 43-15 ATS +65.87 Units
I can only get Bucs at -3 should I buy upon to 3.5 at least?
0
Quote Originally Posted by LeagueCapper:
Oakland Raiders @ Seattle SeahawksDon’t be fooled by the Seahawks close loss last week. The Seahawks, and the Seahawks without Earl Thomas are 2 completely different teams. The Rams, despite losing their top 2 WR’s in the first half, and despite throwing an interception at Seattle’s 2 yard line – still put up 468 yards, 30 first downs, and scored 33 points. This new Seahawks team will struggle mightily against high-powered offenses. I wasn’t super down on the Seahawks entering the year after most their D left because their defense is a system similar to the Patriots, and players have excelled as they are put in schemes and positions to play well. And with Earl Thomas still orchestrating the system , they were still a formidable opponent despite losing a ton of other key defenders. Through 4 games they even held a record of 2-2 despite three of those games being on the road. As we saw last week, that all goes out the window with ET out. The Rams were 1 play away from scoring 39 points on them despite Brandin Cooks and Cooper Kupp getting knocked out early. The Raiders don’t have a great defense, but they should have an easy time going up and down the field against Seattle. Note: Decided to cut this play from 5x to 3x due to the uncertainty of the game being played in London, as there’s just too many extra variables. Either way I still like Oakland, but for slightly less.Raiders +3 -120 (3x) +130 (1x)Bucs +4 -123 (4x)Jets -1.5 (3x) Chargers PK (2x)Texans -10 (1.5x)Ravens -2.5 (4x)Jags -3 (2x)Jags TT Over 22 (1x)Patriots -3 -125 (4x)Bucs +10 / Jets +7 -120 (1.5x)NFL YTD: 43-15 ATS +65.87 Units
I can only get Bucs at -3 should I buy upon to 3.5 at least?
First off let me say: I would love to see the Bucs win this week becuase ihave them over 6.5 RSW.... however, how come you aren’t worried about an Atlanta bounce back off a major blowout? I have noticed in recent years that “good” teams tend to bounce back the following week after getting blown out.... steelers dropped 40+ on them...I won’t be be betting this game becuase of my futures circumstance, but a little feedback would be greatly appreciated as to why you like them so much. If you all ready discussed this somewhere else I am sorry for repetition, and if you could please direct me to that thread I thank you. Thanks again for all of your hard work and dedication to this forum.
So many reasons for me to tag along LC's Bucs pick. Freeman out for Falcons, Winston in for Bucs. He got some air under his legs during that Bears blowout against top 2 defense. Now he gets to play the horrific Falcons team in a dome. A divisional game that he is used to playing tight with, not to mention he has the most to prove right now going forward if he wants to cherish his career on the Bucs or elsewhere. Say what you want but he looked great in preseason, better than Fitz looked. Yes Fitz caught fire but Winston should be way more stable. On top of that I feel like The Falcons offense will get some fatigue now. They've had to battle it out each and every week and seldom walked away with a win. Only a matter of time when that engine doesn't start anymore due to no more gas in the tank. On the opposite end Bucs got embarrassed against the Bears and even Mike Smith is caught up in the pressure now. If anyone has a bounce back game its the Bucs here. The falcons have had multiple chances for bounce back games and failed over and over.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:
First off let me say: I would love to see the Bucs win this week becuase ihave them over 6.5 RSW.... however, how come you aren’t worried about an Atlanta bounce back off a major blowout? I have noticed in recent years that “good” teams tend to bounce back the following week after getting blown out.... steelers dropped 40+ on them...I won’t be be betting this game becuase of my futures circumstance, but a little feedback would be greatly appreciated as to why you like them so much. If you all ready discussed this somewhere else I am sorry for repetition, and if you could please direct me to that thread I thank you. Thanks again for all of your hard work and dedication to this forum.
So many reasons for me to tag along LC's Bucs pick. Freeman out for Falcons, Winston in for Bucs. He got some air under his legs during that Bears blowout against top 2 defense. Now he gets to play the horrific Falcons team in a dome. A divisional game that he is used to playing tight with, not to mention he has the most to prove right now going forward if he wants to cherish his career on the Bucs or elsewhere. Say what you want but he looked great in preseason, better than Fitz looked. Yes Fitz caught fire but Winston should be way more stable. On top of that I feel like The Falcons offense will get some fatigue now. They've had to battle it out each and every week and seldom walked away with a win. Only a matter of time when that engine doesn't start anymore due to no more gas in the tank. On the opposite end Bucs got embarrassed against the Bears and even Mike Smith is caught up in the pressure now. If anyone has a bounce back game its the Bucs here. The falcons have had multiple chances for bounce back games and failed over and over.
Do you have any statistics on road favorites playing their 3rd straight road game? The Titans getting points at home where they are 2-0 from a Ravens team that is 1-2 on the road that is traveling for their 3rd straight game would seem to be a good spot for the Titans, but not when you make it a (4X) play on the Ravens. Do you have an concerns about this being the Ravens 3rd straight road game.
BOL this week!!!
Here is what I was able to find from Odds Shark on how teams playing their 3rd straight road game perform ATS, this is all games, not just games where the team is favored like the Ravens are:
Over the last three years, the team in the third consecutive road game is 13-23 straight up and 11-23-2 against the spread.
Apparently, this does not happen often in the NFL, but when it does the team is covering less than 33% of the time. I am not sure, but I would expect this # would go down if you only looked at teams playing their 3 game on the road that were favored.
Hope this information helps.
BOL!
0
Quote Originally Posted by In2it:
League Capper thanks for posting.
Do you have any statistics on road favorites playing their 3rd straight road game? The Titans getting points at home where they are 2-0 from a Ravens team that is 1-2 on the road that is traveling for their 3rd straight game would seem to be a good spot for the Titans, but not when you make it a (4X) play on the Ravens. Do you have an concerns about this being the Ravens 3rd straight road game.
BOL this week!!!
Here is what I was able to find from Odds Shark on how teams playing their 3rd straight road game perform ATS, this is all games, not just games where the team is favored like the Ravens are:
Over the last three years, the team in the third consecutive road game is 13-23 straight up and 11-23-2 against the spread.
Apparently, this does not happen often in the NFL, but when it does the team is covering less than 33% of the time. I am not sure, but I would expect this # would go down if you only looked at teams playing their 3 game on the road that were favored.
I want to bash you, then question you, then hate you, then cry about tailing you.
Then I remembered that you are 43-15.
When I say "I", I don't mean me. Just reverberating the ghosts here at Covers.
Best of Luck LC
Lol there are lots of people on covers who blindly tail and when they lose act like cry babies and doesn't realize or appreciate that LC is doing a great job and only expect perfection which doesn't exist even with paid services and LC does all this for free.
Keep up the good work LC.
0
Quote Originally Posted by undermysac:
I want to bash you, then question you, then hate you, then cry about tailing you.
Then I remembered that you are 43-15.
When I say "I", I don't mean me. Just reverberating the ghosts here at Covers.
Best of Luck LC
Lol there are lots of people on covers who blindly tail and when they lose act like cry babies and doesn't realize or appreciate that LC is doing a great job and only expect perfection which doesn't exist even with paid services and LC does all this for free.
League Capper thanks for posting.Anyone that has backed all of the home dogs in the NFL this year would have almost as good of a record and you do.....
Home dogs are 13-8 this year....almost as good as 43-15????
League Capper thanks for posting.Anyone that has backed all of the home dogs in the NFL this year would have almost as good of a record and you do.....
Home dogs are 13-8 this year....almost as good as 43-15????
I don’t think New England is a good team - got crush vs Jacksonville/Detroit - could of easily lost week 1 vs Houston - they beat up on 2 average team at home - I just don’t see how New England defense can stop KC offense Sunday night - I’m sure patriots score plenty- but there not out-scoring this KC offense - Bottom line Bill Belichick lost the super bowl because of defense - and he really didn’t do anything in the offseason - 2 fix this problem - Maybe the worst pass rush in the NFL-
0
I don’t think New England is a good team - got crush vs Jacksonville/Detroit - could of easily lost week 1 vs Houston - they beat up on 2 average team at home - I just don’t see how New England defense can stop KC offense Sunday night - I’m sure patriots score plenty- but there not out-scoring this KC offense - Bottom line Bill Belichick lost the super bowl because of defense - and he really didn’t do anything in the offseason - 2 fix this problem - Maybe the worst pass rush in the NFL-
not sure why but feels like a prime week for fave's to cover. only game im hesitant about is Texans. seems like a sandwich spot and dont trust Bill O Brien's lousy playcalling.
nice card this week, liking Ravens and Pats.
BOL LC
Thanks DK, you as well
0
Quote Originally Posted by Digitalkarma:
not sure why but feels like a prime week for fave's to cover. only game im hesitant about is Texans. seems like a sandwich spot and dont trust Bill O Brien's lousy playcalling.
First off let me say: I would love to see the Bucs win this week becuase ihave them over 6.5 RSW.... however, how come you aren’t worried about an Atlanta bounce back off a major blowout? I have noticed in recent years that “good” teams tend to bounce back the following week after getting blown out.... steelers dropped 40+ on them...
I won’t be be betting this game becuase of my futures circumstance, but a little feedback would be greatly appreciated as to why you like them so much. If you all ready discussed this somewhere else I am sorry for repetition, and if you could please direct me to that thread I thank you. Thanks again for all of your hard work and dedication to this forum.
Atlanta has been in a bounce back spot all season and they are 1-4. Anyways, this is more of a play on the Bucs then it is fading Atlanta.
Is there a team more motivated to get a win this Sunday then Tampa? Last two games Bucs lost on national TV, and lost 48-10 to Trubisky. They go in to their bye week with the worst defense in the league, and they've had 2 weeks to think about it. They get their starting QB back in the lineup.. Plus, I was already high on the Bucs heading into the season as is.
I expect to see a strong showing from them, and more effort on the defensive side.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bpickin:
First off let me say: I would love to see the Bucs win this week becuase ihave them over 6.5 RSW.... however, how come you aren’t worried about an Atlanta bounce back off a major blowout? I have noticed in recent years that “good” teams tend to bounce back the following week after getting blown out.... steelers dropped 40+ on them...
I won’t be be betting this game becuase of my futures circumstance, but a little feedback would be greatly appreciated as to why you like them so much. If you all ready discussed this somewhere else I am sorry for repetition, and if you could please direct me to that thread I thank you. Thanks again for all of your hard work and dedication to this forum.
Atlanta has been in a bounce back spot all season and they are 1-4. Anyways, this is more of a play on the Bucs then it is fading Atlanta.
Is there a team more motivated to get a win this Sunday then Tampa? Last two games Bucs lost on national TV, and lost 48-10 to Trubisky. They go in to their bye week with the worst defense in the league, and they've had 2 weeks to think about it. They get their starting QB back in the lineup.. Plus, I was already high on the Bucs heading into the season as is.
I expect to see a strong showing from them, and more effort on the defensive side.
Anyone that has backed all of the home dogs in the NFL this year would have almost as good of a record and you do.
Do you have any statistics on road favorites playing their 3rd straight road game? The Titans getting points at home where they are 2-0 from a Ravens team that is 1-2 on the road that is traveling for their 3rd straight game would seem to be a good spot for the Titans, but not when you make it a (4X) play on the Ravens. Do you have an concerns about this being the Ravens 3rd straight road game.
BOL this week!!!
ATS:
24-24-1 (-0.81, 50.0%)
I don't, considering Harbaugh will not be happy with a 1-2 record on this road trip. Lots of other intangibles favoring Baltimore in this matchup as well
0
Quote Originally Posted by In2it:
League Capper thanks for posting.
Anyone that has backed all of the home dogs in the NFL this year would have almost as good of a record and you do.
Do you have any statistics on road favorites playing their 3rd straight road game? The Titans getting points at home where they are 2-0 from a Ravens team that is 1-2 on the road that is traveling for their 3rd straight game would seem to be a good spot for the Titans, but not when you make it a (4X) play on the Ravens. Do you have an concerns about this being the Ravens 3rd straight road game.
BOL this week!!!
ATS:
24-24-1 (-0.81, 50.0%)
I don't, considering Harbaugh will not be happy with a 1-2 record on this road trip. Lots of other intangibles favoring Baltimore in this matchup as well
So many reasons for me to tag along LC's Bucs pick. Freeman out for Falcons, Winston in for Bucs. He got some air under his legs during that Bears blowout against top 2 defense. Now he gets to play the horrific Falcons team in a dome. A divisional game that he is used to playing tight with, not to mention he has the most to prove right now going forward if he wants to cherish his career on the Bucs or elsewhere. Say what you want but he looked great in preseason, better than Fitz looked. Yes Fitz caught fire but Winston should be way more stable. On top of that I feel like The Falcons offense will get some fatigue now. They've had to battle it out each and every week and seldom walked away with a win. Only a matter of time when that engine doesn't start anymore due to no more gas in the tank. On the opposite end Bucs got embarrassed against the Bears and even Mike Smith is caught up in the pressure now. If anyone has a bounce back game its the Bucs here. The falcons have had multiple chances for bounce back games and failed over and over.
Yep, good thoughts
0
Quote Originally Posted by tchamps:
So many reasons for me to tag along LC's Bucs pick. Freeman out for Falcons, Winston in for Bucs. He got some air under his legs during that Bears blowout against top 2 defense. Now he gets to play the horrific Falcons team in a dome. A divisional game that he is used to playing tight with, not to mention he has the most to prove right now going forward if he wants to cherish his career on the Bucs or elsewhere. Say what you want but he looked great in preseason, better than Fitz looked. Yes Fitz caught fire but Winston should be way more stable. On top of that I feel like The Falcons offense will get some fatigue now. They've had to battle it out each and every week and seldom walked away with a win. Only a matter of time when that engine doesn't start anymore due to no more gas in the tank. On the opposite end Bucs got embarrassed against the Bears and even Mike Smith is caught up in the pressure now. If anyone has a bounce back game its the Bucs here. The falcons have had multiple chances for bounce back games and failed over and over.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.