Adding a recommended play in the NFL:
hell yeah
Yeah we will get to Brees everytime as they ball is being dumped off to Sproles for 18 yard games... ALL game long!!! FUCK I didnt wanna play these guys!!!
Yeah we will get to Brees everytime as they ball is being dumped off to Sproles for 18 yard games... ALL game long!!! FUCK I didnt wanna play these guys!!!
I like Denver at home, I am seeing +9.5 now. Pitt is not the Pitt they use to be. Their defense is so much more beatable and with Tebows speed he may be able to put up enough to keep this game close and a easy cover. I have not bet Denver yet as I have never been a believer. I just think its too many points at home in the playoffs for a guy who (ok this is hard for me to say) is a game changer. And Pitt is slacking on offense this year too. They're not bad but should be better and Ben is still hurting if Denver plays any defense this once again should be a easy cover.
I like Denver at home, I am seeing +9.5 now. Pitt is not the Pitt they use to be. Their defense is so much more beatable and with Tebows speed he may be able to put up enough to keep this game close and a easy cover. I have not bet Denver yet as I have never been a believer. I just think its too many points at home in the playoffs for a guy who (ok this is hard for me to say) is a game changer. And Pitt is slacking on offense this year too. They're not bad but should be better and Ben is still hurting if Denver plays any defense this once again should be a easy cover.
[/Quote
Good Job on San DIego and Miami last week. This week you say Atl,Texans, and Broncos?
[/Quote
Good Job on San DIego and Miami last week. This week you say Atl,Texans, and Broncos?
And only twice has the #1 seed from either side actually WON the superbowl in the last 10 years...
Superbowl XLIV - Saints (Both teams were #1 seed so it had to happen)
Superbowl XXXVIII - New England
This statistic is talking about winning SU......So I guess if GB is playing anyone but NE, the bet should be agasint GB right?.... .... since the spread will definately have GB giving points, taking the points with the other team would be the play based entierly on this statistic.
And only twice has the #1 seed from either side actually WON the superbowl in the last 10 years...
Superbowl XLIV - Saints (Both teams were #1 seed so it had to happen)
Superbowl XXXVIII - New England
This statistic is talking about winning SU......So I guess if GB is playing anyone but NE, the bet should be agasint GB right?.... .... since the spread will definately have GB giving points, taking the points with the other team would be the play based entierly on this statistic.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.