All Forums | NFL Betting

No Doubt About it...REFs ruling on 4th & 1 was the difference!

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1638
Posts: 27
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 7109
Posted: #1

Wow, Eagles driving tie game..in Dallas territory..and the REFS fuck with the Actual Spot..I replayed it over & over...that was a 1st DOWN...by a decent amount...

Sorry Eagles backers..I just lost another one tonight as well!

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4417
Posted: #2
horrendous call

oh well
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2008
Posts: 1699
Posted: #3
Refs gave philly enough calls on flags. And buy the way it was not a first down
 
Covers Rehab
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 922
Posted: #4

Dont worry about it sammy, who you like tomorrow but?

, you will get it back then.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2008
Posts: 4616
Posted: #5
They were getting plenty of pressure on Romo, he was ripe for another turnover, should have punted there - no doubt, especially when you consider their struggles on 3rd and 4th and short over that last two seasons.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 7109
Posted: #6

I guess we disagree with the call...you got a guy from 30 yards away coming in to make a call like that?

Replay showed where his elbow hit the ground and the ball. If you make a line from that point across to the 1st down marker..it was a 1st down by at minimum a football length.

 

 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 36317
Posted: #7
years before the "yellow line"...that was a run on 4th and "inches" where, everyone and the grandma, KNEW it he got it....now with technology up the ass, somehow, he loses about 1/2 yard
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2008
Posts: 2569
Posted: #8
 SMITTY YOUR A FUCKING MORON IF YOU BELIVE THAT WASNT A FIRST DOWN..CMON GRANTED I LOST ON PHILLY BUT EVEN IF I HAD DALLAS I WOULD SAY THAT WAS A FIRST..
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 36317
Posted: #9
their
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 57577
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by smitty519:

Refs gave philly enough calls on flags. And buy the way it was not a first down

PLEASE spell "by" correctly. Jesus. It's TWO letters.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6672
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by smitty519:

Refs gave philly enough calls on flags. And buy the way it was not a first down
The timing of the calls is crucial, and that in which they could easily, like candy, have spotted the ball as a first down, is how the refs/League, control all of these meaningless games.  Don't ever forget it
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6672
Posted: #12
Quote Originally Posted by cubboy:

 SMITTY YOUR A FUCKING MORON IF YOU BELIVE THAT WASNT A FIRST DOWN..CMON GRANTED I LOST ON PHILLY BUT EVEN IF I HAD DALLAS I WOULD SAY THAT WAS A FIRST..
That was definitely a first down, only the refs can say otherwise ... btw had Dal ML
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2007
Posts: 36739
Posted: #13
Really was no way you could overturn it though.  There was not CLEAR evidence that he got past the yard.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6672
Posted: #14
Quote Originally Posted by ICAPSports:

years before the "yellow line"...that was a run on 4th and "inches" where, everyone and the grandma, KNEW it he got it....now with technology up the ass, somehow, he loses about 1/2 yard
These games are rigged.  No one who is of sound mind and sound body, can argue otherwise.  No One!  Every week, the same fraud is perpetrated.  This is bigger then Madoff
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6672
Posted: #15
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:

Really was no way you could overturn it though.  There was not CLEAR evidence that he got past the yard.
Granted, yet they could if they wanted to, and if they wanted to spot a first down oringinally, the pigs spot the skin accordingly
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2004
Posts: 36317
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by 4seasons:

These games are rigged.  No one who is of sound mind and sound body, can argue otherwise.  No One!  Every week, the same fraud is perpetrated.  This is bigger then Madoff


sadly, I can't argue with this.....NBA and NFL are clearly the biggest offenders
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2009
Posts: 899
Posted: #17
  1. 2-1-DAL 45 (12:05) 29-L.McCoy right end to DAL 45 for no gain (93-A.Spencer).
  2. 3-1-DAL 45 (11:26) 29-L.McCoy left tackle to DAL 45 for no gain (56-B.James).
  3. 4-1-DAL 45 (11:01) 5-D.McNabb up the middle to DAL 45 for no gain (96-M.Spears). Philadelphia challenged the first down ruling, and the play was Upheld. (Timeout #3 at 10:49.)
These bums deserved to lose.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2009
Posts: 167
Posted: #18
Quote Originally Posted by CMJohnson1:

Really was no way you could overturn it though.  There was not CLEAR evidence that he got past the yard.


there was clear evidence if they use the eagle's beak to spot where the ball was it was clearly a first down.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 4530
Posted: #19
i tell you guys.. that was just to much to end the week. i won a nice amount of money this week. but this game would have won me about close to 10 dimes. i had philly pard with nevada for 2 dimes. and i had them for two dimes on a single. i also took them in the second half with nevada second half for a dime. and all these ass holes on covers that laugh at a person after a brutal loss like that are just bad people. i would never laugh at a person after a loss. i dont care what side i am on. i am going to leave this site alone for a minute. to many assholes for me to bite my tounge. good luck to the good fellas.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6724
Posted: #20

Quote Originally Posted by 4seasons:

These games are rigged.  No one who is of sound mind and sound body, can argue otherwise.  No One!  Every week, the same fraud is perpetrated.  This is bigger then Madoff

 With all the horrendous calls made AFTER reviewing a replay, I'm fully convinced that some of these games are rigged.  I just wonder when they go in the replay booth if the refs are getting instructions from the NFL commisioner, Vegas, or both.   

 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2004
Posts: 6724
Posted: #21

Quote Originally Posted by RiverJack:



there was clear evidence if they use the eagle's beak to spot where the ball was it was clearly a first down.

Yep.  If Collinsworth and Michaels come to that conclusion, obviously the officials should be able to do the same.  As crazy as this sounds, I think the broadcasters should be in charge of the review instead of the officials.  At least that way, the viewer could hear their rationale for making that conclusion.  The refs just say the call on the field stands, but offer no reasoning. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 4530
Posted: #22

this is how they killed me, i had a two dimes with a local and a dime on nevada with the local, but my off shore book got back with that fucking call.

 08, 2009 07:55 PM (08:05:23 PM)     Writer:INETUSR     Confirmation #:091108195545-1

var BrowserName = navigator.appName; if (BrowserName.toUpperCase().indexOf('MICROSOFT INTERNET EXPLORER')!= -1) { document.write(""); } else if (BrowserName.toUpperCase().indexOf('NETSCAPE') != -1) { document.write(""); } LOST
2 tms PARLAY       2000/4680       $-2000  
426. Eagles (Philadelphia)
PS   -3   -110   { Pro Ftbll }    (20-16)
427. Nevada
PS   -13   -130   Buy 1   { Col Ftbll }    (62-7)

Nov 08, 2009 10:04 PM (10:11:48 PM)     Writer:INETUSR     Confirmation #:091108220452-1 var BrowserName = navigator.appName; if (BrowserName.toUpperCase().indexOf('MICROSOFT INTERNET EXPLORER')!= -1) { document.write(""); } else if (BrowserName.toUpperCase().indexOf('NETSCAPE') != -1) { document.write(""); } LOST
2 tms PARLAY       1000/2400       $-1000  
2427. 2H-Nevada
PS   -7   -125   { Col Ftbll }    (28-7)
2426. 2H-Eagles (Philadelphia)
PS   -2½   -110   { Pro Ftbll }    (10-10)

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 1553
Posted: #23

may have been a poor spot, but it isnt the first time i have seen one....i would say something much more alarming that this "bad spot" was Pitt being a full 3 to 4 inches short of a 1st down agaisnt Cleveland a few weeks back and them giving Pitt the first down....absolutely astonishing...

and there is no way you can say that Philly "would have done this" or was "going to do that". they were driving yes, but for all you know the next play could have been a pick 6....what ifs will kill you in this line of work

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2009
Posts: 4530
Posted: #24
Quote Originally Posted by Bruce_Willis:

may have been a poor spot, but it isnt the first time i have seen one....i would say something much more alarming that this "bad spot" was Pitt being a full 3 to 4 inches short of a 1st down agaisnt Cleveland a few weeks back and them giving Pitt the first down....absolutely astonishing...

and there is no way you can say that Philly "would have done this" or was "going to do that". they were driving yes, but for all you know the next play could have been a pick 6....what ifs will kill you in this line of work

 
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 14189
Posted: #25
Quote Originally Posted by frankierizzo:

  1. 2-1-DAL 45 (12:05) 29-L.McCoy right end to DAL 45 for no gain (93-A.Spencer).
  2. 3-1-DAL 45 (11:26) 29-L.McCoy left tackle to DAL 45 for no gain (56-B.James).
  3. 4-1-DAL 45 (11:01) 5-D.McNabb up the middle to DAL 45 for no gain (96-M.Spears). Philadelphia challenged the first down ruling, and the play was Upheld. (Timeout #3 at 10:49.)

These bums deserved to lose.

On top of them not being able to run in short yardage there dufous of a coach BLOWS 2 Timeouts challenging spots. Thats when you knew they were done

 

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.