Ok, for all transparency I am Redskins fan. Philly favored by 4.5. Let's assume:
Jalen Hurts isn't 100 percent...he was sort of limping around after the game; let's assume Philly cornerbacks are as hurt as we think they are; let's assume AJ Brown has a new book to read; let's assume Philly's FG kicker continues to miss; let's assume that Philly continues to lean on Saquon Barkley.
Don't you think the Skins will stack the box and dare Hurts to beat them through the air? Washington beat Philly Dec 22nd but Hurts went out in first quarter and Barkley had 150 yards; Pickett was the QB. The Skins won on a last minute TD with 10 seconds to go. I hope the Skins learn from that game and the playoffs that the key to beating Philly is stop Barkley, stack the box. When it comes to the Philly Defense, the Skins play a fast up tempo game and so I hope that sort of negates Philly's pass rush some and Daniels has shown he can get rid of the ball quickly and with Philly secondary decimated to a degree, i would just stay away from throwing in Darrius Slayer area. The Skins have traveled well and so going to Philly down I-95 is ok despite their fans.
All i am saying that Philly -4.5 is in my mind disrespecting the quality of play the Redskins have recently shown us.
I hope the Skins stack the box!!!!!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Ok, for all transparency I am Redskins fan. Philly favored by 4.5. Let's assume:
Jalen Hurts isn't 100 percent...he was sort of limping around after the game; let's assume Philly cornerbacks are as hurt as we think they are; let's assume AJ Brown has a new book to read; let's assume Philly's FG kicker continues to miss; let's assume that Philly continues to lean on Saquon Barkley.
Don't you think the Skins will stack the box and dare Hurts to beat them through the air? Washington beat Philly Dec 22nd but Hurts went out in first quarter and Barkley had 150 yards; Pickett was the QB. The Skins won on a last minute TD with 10 seconds to go. I hope the Skins learn from that game and the playoffs that the key to beating Philly is stop Barkley, stack the box. When it comes to the Philly Defense, the Skins play a fast up tempo game and so I hope that sort of negates Philly's pass rush some and Daniels has shown he can get rid of the ball quickly and with Philly secondary decimated to a degree, i would just stay away from throwing in Darrius Slayer area. The Skins have traveled well and so going to Philly down I-95 is ok despite their fans.
All i am saying that Philly -4.5 is in my mind disrespecting the quality of play the Redskins have recently shown us.
I’ll enjoy making money on KC for their 6th straight playoff game. They’re obviously the new black hat team/dynasty. I’ll bet against the fans’ emotional state and enjoy seeing how it plays out.
0
@GMoneyGTown
I’ll enjoy making money on KC for their 6th straight playoff game. They’re obviously the new black hat team/dynasty. I’ll bet against the fans’ emotional state and enjoy seeing how it plays out.
I thought Detroit has been the best team all the year....and what happened when they played the Skins. To be honest Eagles-Skins game this weekend reminds of Detroit-Skins game last week.
0
@Battalion74
I thought Detroit has been the best team all the year....and what happened when they played the Skins. To be honest Eagles-Skins game this weekend reminds of Detroit-Skins game last week.
Then why are you here on a betting forum??? I don't get why "fans" come here and attempt to handicap a game they know nothing about. Everything they say is based on their emotions and not fact. (See threads started by lookingtowin and Rxistrash). They base outcomes on their emotions and wonder why they keep losing.
0
"Ok, for all transparency I am Redskins fan."
Then why are you here on a betting forum??? I don't get why "fans" come here and attempt to handicap a game they know nothing about. Everything they say is based on their emotions and not fact. (See threads started by lookingtowin and Rxistrash). They base outcomes on their emotions and wonder why they keep losing.
I am here on a betting forum cause like you I presume you like to gamble and i presume you don't watch every Redskins game and play like i do through the year so perhaps i would give you some insight. And hence why I started off saying that, give you my reasoning and then tell you why I don't think Philly -4.5 is a good bet. At least, I tell you why i like something rather than some people here on come on and say they like something without any reasoning or justification and people jump on them cause they see some posting of a record which no one can confirm. LOL....LOL....
Feel free to ignore that I am a Redskins fan and go right ahead and bet Philly -4.5 sir.
0
@C-70Blues
I am here on a betting forum cause like you I presume you like to gamble and i presume you don't watch every Redskins game and play like i do through the year so perhaps i would give you some insight. And hence why I started off saying that, give you my reasoning and then tell you why I don't think Philly -4.5 is a good bet. At least, I tell you why i like something rather than some people here on come on and say they like something without any reasoning or justification and people jump on them cause they see some posting of a record which no one can confirm. LOL....LOL....
Feel free to ignore that I am a Redskins fan and go right ahead and bet Philly -4.5 sir.
@C-70Blues I am here on a betting forum cause like you I presume you like to gamble and i presume you don't watch every Redskins game and play like i do through the year so perhaps i would give you some insight. And hence why I started off saying that, give you my reasoning and then tell you why I don't think Philly -4.5 is a good bet. At least, I tell you why i like something rather than some people here on come on and say they like something without any reasoning or justification and people jump on them cause they see some posting of a record which no one can confirm. LOL....LOL.... Feel free to ignore that I am a Redskins fan and go right ahead and bet Philly -4.5 sir.
You are full off assumptions and presumptions aren't you? You probably assume you could coach an NFL team with your 'stack the box' philosophy.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
@C-70Blues I am here on a betting forum cause like you I presume you like to gamble and i presume you don't watch every Redskins game and play like i do through the year so perhaps i would give you some insight. And hence why I started off saying that, give you my reasoning and then tell you why I don't think Philly -4.5 is a good bet. At least, I tell you why i like something rather than some people here on come on and say they like something without any reasoning or justification and people jump on them cause they see some posting of a record which no one can confirm. LOL....LOL.... Feel free to ignore that I am a Redskins fan and go right ahead and bet Philly -4.5 sir.
You are full off assumptions and presumptions aren't you? You probably assume you could coach an NFL team with your 'stack the box' philosophy.
Nope, can't coach a team but can answer some of your sarcastic comments.
@C-70Blues
You obviously didn't watch the Redskins-Detroit game last week or you don't understand the stats....Detroit's Gibbs had 14 rushes for 105 yards with a long run of 33 yards. Therefore take that long run away he had 13 rush attempts for 72 yards for an average of 5.5 yards an attempt. Montgomery their other RB had 7 attempts for 28 yards or 4 yards a rush. Williams was the other guy who had a reverse run for a TD which again skewered the stat you are quoting last week. Did i say we will shut down Saquon or did i say we stand a better chance if we stack the box in an attempt to limit his success.
Don't want to continue this back and forth with you, you are entitled to your opinion....i am sure there are many who bet Tampa Bay Bucs and Detroit Lions quoting the stats you have against the Skins, the same people who will be betting the Eagles this weekend.
0
@C-70Blues
Nope, can't coach a team but can answer some of your sarcastic comments.
@C-70Blues
You obviously didn't watch the Redskins-Detroit game last week or you don't understand the stats....Detroit's Gibbs had 14 rushes for 105 yards with a long run of 33 yards. Therefore take that long run away he had 13 rush attempts for 72 yards for an average of 5.5 yards an attempt. Montgomery their other RB had 7 attempts for 28 yards or 4 yards a rush. Williams was the other guy who had a reverse run for a TD which again skewered the stat you are quoting last week. Did i say we will shut down Saquon or did i say we stand a better chance if we stack the box in an attempt to limit his success.
Don't want to continue this back and forth with you, you are entitled to your opinion....i am sure there are many who bet Tampa Bay Bucs and Detroit Lions quoting the stats you have against the Skins, the same people who will be betting the Eagles this weekend.
@C-70Blues Nope, can't coach a team but can answer some of your sarcastic comments. @C-70Blues You obviously didn't watch the Redskins-Detroit game last week or you don't understand the stats....Detroit's Gibbs had 14 rushes for 105 yards with a long run of 33 yards. Therefore take that long run away he had 13 rush attempts for 72 yards for an average of 5.5 yards an attempt. Montgomery their other RB had 7 attempts for 28 yards or 4 yards a rush. Williams was the other guy who had a reverse run for a TD which again skewered the stat you are quoting last week. Did i say we will shut down Saquon or did i say we stand a better chance if we stack the box in an attempt to limit his success. Don't want to continue this back and forth with you, you are entitled to your opinion....i am sure there are many who bet Tampa Bay Bucs and Detroit Lions quoting the stats you have against the Skins, the same people who will be betting the Eagles this weekend.
F*ckin' fans!
0
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
@C-70Blues Nope, can't coach a team but can answer some of your sarcastic comments. @C-70Blues You obviously didn't watch the Redskins-Detroit game last week or you don't understand the stats....Detroit's Gibbs had 14 rushes for 105 yards with a long run of 33 yards. Therefore take that long run away he had 13 rush attempts for 72 yards for an average of 5.5 yards an attempt. Montgomery their other RB had 7 attempts for 28 yards or 4 yards a rush. Williams was the other guy who had a reverse run for a TD which again skewered the stat you are quoting last week. Did i say we will shut down Saquon or did i say we stand a better chance if we stack the box in an attempt to limit his success. Don't want to continue this back and forth with you, you are entitled to your opinion....i am sure there are many who bet Tampa Bay Bucs and Detroit Lions quoting the stats you have against the Skins, the same people who will be betting the Eagles this weekend.
Had the Lions handed the ball to Gibbs 25-30 times like they should have they probably drill Washington. Was an awful offensive game plan and I doubt the Eagles make that mistake although I'd like to see Washington win. That run defense is just too bad and Barkley is the best player on the field. Eagles just need to keep feeding him.
0
@GMoneyGTown
Had the Lions handed the ball to Gibbs 25-30 times like they should have they probably drill Washington. Was an awful offensive game plan and I doubt the Eagles make that mistake although I'd like to see Washington win. That run defense is just too bad and Barkley is the best player on the field. Eagles just need to keep feeding him.
@Battalion74 I thought Detroit has been the best team all the year....and what happened when they played the Skins. To be honest Eagles-Skins game this weekend reminds of Detroit-Skins game last week.
You thought wrong fan.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GMoneyGTown:
@Battalion74 I thought Detroit has been the best team all the year....and what happened when they played the Skins. To be honest Eagles-Skins game this weekend reminds of Detroit-Skins game last week.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.