All Forums | NFL Betting

Saint won back to back weeks

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 7078
Posts: 81
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2008
Posts: 641
Posted: #51
What about the other 34% of the time? What happened since '89 is irrelevant.  Some of the players on both rosters weren't even born yet.

Jesus.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2009
Posts: 465
Posted: #52
Quote Originally Posted by wizard1183:

That's the thing. Sure. Saints are a juggernaut. But the skins own them 66% of the time. Saints are 4-8 SU and ATS vs them since 89. Skins keep it close...

what the fuk does what happened between the two teams with 100% different players since 89 have to do with sundays contest?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2009
Posts: 1958
Posted: #53
Mr .Bator are you going to play money line as well on this game ? 
 
MVP
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 15755
Posted: #54
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2011
Posts: 3173
Posted: #55
Some of these trends that people bring up do my head in, Here's a trend for this weekend, A team who had Ed Hochuli ref their game and then the following week had more than 4 players kneel for the anthem and their coach lose both challenges, Don't do well on the road the following week.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 727
Posted: #56
My quote button doesn't work....

@Prospect: by your statement dogs in the SB covering at a staggering % doesn't mean anything cause those ABs are too far back lol
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #57
Quote Originally Posted by SwishSwish1234:

Some of these trends that people bring up do my head in, Here's a trend for this weekend, A team who had Ed Hochuli ref their game and then the following week had more than 4 players kneel for the anthem and their coach lose both challenges, Don't do well on the road the following week.


How far back is the sample size?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2010
Posts: 13189
Posted: #58
I am the last person that should be going agaisnt saints right now, but who said they won’t win by 1?
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2006
Posts: 11966
Posted: #59
This is brutal some of you guys are arbitrarily modifying. Bators simple 30 / 10 parameters.  I bet bator is feeling like hes talking to autistic children right about now 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 1754
Posted: #60
Meh, Skins have had plenty of chances to get competitive in the NFC and have blown most of them. Had the lead vs KC, blew that. Got destroyed by the Eagles, got destroyed by Dallas, lost to Minnesota at home recently.

I've been high on the Saints all year and have been playing on them the last few weeks so not sure i NEED to lay 9 with them now, but this time of the year teams that are rolling tend to keep it going and I wouldnt be taking the Skins in the dome considering how bad their D is vs the pass. Norman is so overrated he got abused by Case Keenum and that's with Minny having no run game.

NO is my pick to win the NFC, even with as good as the Eagles have been playing. And NO knows they need that homefield they won't take games off. I have a funny feeling the Eagles will sputter at the end of the year or be one and done like Dallas last year, just with the lack of experience at QB and maybe the RB by committee not working so well down the stretch plus the backup tackle Vaitai is not very good.

I think the NFC championship will be a rematch of the week 1 matchup Vikings and Saints. But maybe that's just being from Philly we expect our teams to do great in the regular season and then fall at the last hurdle. Still if the Saints get anyone in the dome with their experience at QB and HC and they're run game and defense playing so good now I like them a lot.

If you're taking this trend you're basically hoping for a SU loss and cover, I think if you're taking a dog in the NFL you should only take dogs you think can win SU most of the time and I don't see them beating one of the hottest teams on the road with Brees at the helm and a great run game when they couldn't beat a similarly hot team at home, who only had Keenum and a mediocre run game.
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 727
Posted: #61
I agree. I think it's Saints Vikings NFCCG
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 727
Posted: #62
If it comes to fruition? I actually hope Saints play in Minny for it. They're a much diff team than the first meet. 

As for this week? Saitns have never beat Skins in the Dome in 25 yrs. 0-4 SU and ATS last 4 home games. Take it for what it's worth. 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2015
Posts: 2732
Posted: #63
Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:



Well, you’re looking like a fool anyways (along with some other guys around here), because you’re as of yet unable to comprehend the rather simple parameters of this long-running trend. Wmi799 re-posted it on this page and he thoughtfully used red lettering to hopefully help guys out. 

To repeat, the Saints are the first team this season to qualify for this system. Can we all at least get THAT straight?

Always good to hear it from the source. I'm in on Redskins this weekend - thanks! 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 727
Posted: #64
Redakins ahould cover the 7.8/8 points. 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2016
Posts: 12
Posted: #65
I thought i posted the simple parameters to run the query. it goes like this

Any NFL Team who scored 30 or more and gave up 12 or less now playing a non division opponent is 3-22 all time vs. the spread.
Simple. Run it through the database. SOLID GOLD BOYS!! 

The theory is both sides of the ball have peaked, the line will be inflated and Washington has an 88% chance to cover based on this trend.heres the link

https://sportsdatabase.com/nfl/query?output=default&sdql=DIV%3D0+and+po%3Apoints%3C%3D12+and+ppo%3Apoints%3C%3D12+and+30%3C%3Dp%3Apoints+and+30%3C%3Dpp%3Apoints+and+season%3E%3D1992&submit=++S+D+Q+L+%21++
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2004
Posts: 50586
Posted: #66
Quote Originally Posted by zebrakiller:

ah our dear Champs PATRIOTS

well in 07 the bator rule went out the window 



No, it didn’t. Not once during the 2007 season did the Patriots win consecutive games by scoring 30 or more in each while holding their opponents to 10 or less in each.
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 10311
Posted: #67
I don't think he is capable of understanding the rule and how to use it.

He just makes stuff up and believes it is the rule, crazy but so true.
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 324
Posted: #68
The reason Washington is losing is because they don't have enough healthy players to put on the field , them playing a team who has won 2 games by DD don't make them a smart bet .
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2017
Posts: 412
Posted: #69

Nobody gets under my skin more on this forum then this f u c k I n g guy......the absolute definition of a MUSH.......

 

Repug.

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 3272
Posted: #70
MRBATOR, Do we take Skins +7.5 today?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2013
Posts: 3272
Posted: #71
Obviously should have typed +9.5
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2007
Posts: 4417
Posted: #72

Quote Originally Posted by MrBator:

QUOTE Originally Posted by zebrakiller: ah our dear Champs PATRIOTS well in 07 the bator rule went out the window  No, it didn’t. Not once during the 2007 season did the Patriots win consecutive games by scoring 30 or more in each while holding their opponents to 10 or less in each.

 

Bator!!  What up?  long time no see my friend!  hope you're havin a great season!an_cheers

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 4887
Posted: #73
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2014
Posts: 47687
Posted: #74
Ya gotta wonder sometimes...how hard it can be to follow simpe parameters....?


Here's one for you Bpickin.

The last time a team won 8 straight games after losing their first 2 was the 1947 Bears...daaaaaaaa bears.

How long can the Saints keep the pedal to the metal? It's a tough and physical game, very difficult to keep up the intensity week in week out. That's the whole premise behind the Bator rule btw.

I'm sitting this one out but will be rooting for anyone holding a Redskins ticket

 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2013
Posts: 727
Posted: #75
Last time a team went 0-2 and won SB was 93 Cowboys.  They went 6-1 ATS I believe next 7 games
All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.