SDQL WEEK 4

You sure on this one buddy?

Make this week=4 and you can add Seahawks Monday night, got some good one's but I can find Queary's that make me go the other way or no play.

@hoody

 "Queary" is not a word.  If it was a word, the plural form of it would be "quearys" or "quearies."

@J-Cats

So So sorry I hit an extra letter if we could still pm people, I would have sent him a pm like we use to do with each other. He's asked for help before, and if I could I did, the same went the other way. Thkans 4 the spelign lesson.

Jowchoo I know you like OV-UN's

week = 4 and p:ATSL and pp:ATSL and D and t:wins<3 and on:D and n:D    (11-23 UN 32.4% Titans-Dolphins)

Those seem identical to me.  Please check and amend it, then post the corrected query and percentage.

Thanks for all of your time and effort.

Jowchoo, now I see the difference - it's the covers.

I am posting on Covers; it should have been on the tip of my mind.

Jowchoo you do realize Bills are a Bator method fade this coming week.

Hits about 75% ATS

Teams score 30 pts or more back to back and ....

Give up 10 or less back to back 

A regression method.

I really like the Packers play, Bounce Factor fade on Vikings for me. And a double play at that for you ...............

THX hoody.

Yes that is a query supporting NE

note buying out of the JET/DEN over

Thx claw, if I recall the Conkin play is for weeks 6 and past, if not I really feel the Bills are head and shoulders above the rest of the league.

@jowchoo

 Bol this week

beauty..feels like 14-13 game

WASH/ARZ under 57// ARIZ +3 -120

NYJ -1.5// under 46 -117

Way to add value to this thread.....Piss off!!

total<=37 and season>2010

63%

CLEV/LV under 37

Not much of a trend user myself but there are some that I feel are pertinent and I will use. 

I love the info for cross-referencing against what I show in my database which only goes back to 2021 but is exhaustive in the amount of statistical and non-statistical information per game. I'll grab a few you post and try to figure out something I can use preemptively (coaching/coordinator schemes and systems vs opposing schemes/systems, personnel matchups, rule changes, etc...) as to why those trends are occurring/occurred and hopefully be on those games early on in the trends life and ride the upswing. It's my endless quest, after 25+ years of doing this, at merging the trend based/statistical handicapping with the match-up/scheme, situational handicapping that I feel holds the key to the "why" it happened and therefore is more predictive. Basically, trying to predict the trend before the trend occurs or is still at least in its infancy.    

Good shit either way.

Thanks again for the information Jowchoo and Good Luck on all your plays. 

@jowchoo

thanks for the plays

Few teams on this one ,came from the dog site

H and t:wins=1 and ot:wins<3 and op:L and week=4   ( 33-55-1   39.8%) good go against

teaser:

CLEV+8.5//NYJ-1.5

Buying out of my OVER in the PHILLY game, wide receiver injuries.

UNDER 47.5 CAR/CINC

Right now Bills look like the best team.  No doubt.

If you look at many stats they are playing far better then the best in history, teams can only play like this for short periods.

The Bator method had plays in week 3 the past 2 years and won both of them. One was on the Bills and they lost SU.

You can run the numbers. I think Cokin was score 30 give up 12 but Bator is score 30 give up 10 back to back.

Bator may have researched it and made it better. I have done this myself, that is how I developed the BF.

If you do, check to see if the team fails to lose ATS,  do they lose ATS the next game.

Good stuff as always . ......................

Record?