All Forums | NFL Betting

Seahawks are such a square pick

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 3221
Posts: 44
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 3989
Posted: #26
goodluck on wagering teams in week 1....superbowl hangover and a packers team looking for revenge...such a coin flip   
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2011
Posts: 351
Posted: #27
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:


"Who had Seattle picked to be dominate and win the SB this time last year?"


 I did.........& so did many others.........bet against them all year & see how you do.

Hawks haters are same ones who were all over Denver in SB...they just don't have a clue... 
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2006
Posts: 164
Posted: #28
You think seahawks is square? Aaron Rogers +  5.5 or 6, doesn't get any more square then that, pretty much identical to monday night football's game last year drew bree's + 6.5 and how'd that work out? people drool over those kind of QB's getting almost a touchdown
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Apr, 2014
Posts: 173
Posted: #29
Quote Originally Posted by HoustonSports:

Every site I see the wagers 0n the spread are relatively even between the two teams.  


Yep, the square/sharp thing is nonsense. Bets are spread pretty evenly because the lines are well set year after year, vegas knows what it is doing. I'd say this was a 7.0 pt spread game, so 5.5 6.0 6.5 whatever you got either side is reasonable.

I am not saying Seattle covers for sure, bu that's the side I like based on

SEA @ home - almost unbeatable, crowd huge advantage, top defense etc plus GB first team o-line looked bad pre season, Raji is gone, and they're starting a new kid at center in the worst environment in the game.

I will not be stunned by GB winning by 10 this is the NFL, but I sure as hell 'aint betting because of some mystical notion of where the 'sharp' and 'square' money has gone.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2011
Posts: 3117
Posted: #30
Quote Originally Posted by theKCco_op:


Hawks haters are same ones who were all over Denver in SB...they just don't have a clue... 

Seattle was my biggest bet of the year vs Denver.  But tonight I go Green Bay for multiple reasons.   Although I am not a Seahawks hater.  
 
All-Star
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2008
Posts: 10333
Posted: #31
Since 2000 the SB winner is 9-4-1 ATS on opening day !!
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #32
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:


"Who had Seattle picked to be dominate and win the SB this time last year?"


 I did.........& so did many others.........bet against them all year & see how you do.

Mugg

I like you and respect you... but you are wrong here.  Let's see how they do.  They might do very well and repeat... or they might end up being like every other SB winner - to be faded one year later.  We will find out

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #33
Line dropped to 4.5 now...

Seems to me that many of you are drinking Seahawks kool aid... as if they cannot be defeated.

BOL to all - we are about to find out just how dominant they really are.
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #34
7-3 GB

 
Hall of Fame
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2010
Posts: 29027
Posted: #35
This thread got quiet real quickly.  

Hip to be square.  
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2013
Posts: 1042
Posted: #36
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36999
Posted: #37
 
 
Legend
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2003
Posts: 36999
Posted: #38
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:

Line dropped to 4.5 now...

Seems to me that many of you are drinking Seahawks kool aid... as if they cannot be defeated.

BOL to all - we are about to find out just how dominant they really are.
Any questions? 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #39
16-36


I have had enough popcorn
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #40
Quote Originally Posted by THEMUGG:

Any questions? 

Mugg 1

SF 0

congrats  
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 5575
Posted: #41
Quote Originally Posted by PapaShango:

This thread got quiet real quickly.  

Hip to be square.  

Touche lol
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 260
Posted: #42
AFN you starting a new thread this year?
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2012
Posts: 260
Posted: #43
Quote Originally Posted by AFNfootballnerd:

goodluck on wagering teams in week 1....superbowl hangover and a packers team looking for revenge...such a coin flip   

New thread this season?
 
 
Rookie
Participation Meter
Joined: Dec, 2007
Posts: 545
Posted: #44

Sometimes the squares cover and sometimes the sharps cover. 75% of sportsbook managers predicted GB to cover in Gaming Today's contest and they were wrong. I liked Seattle and don't consider myself a square or a sharp.

In 2013, half the time the favorite covered and half the time the dog covered.  Each game must be analyzed on its own.

All Forums | NFL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.