The Hawks got lucky because if they would've faced the Cowboys I don't feel they would've beat them.......That call was the best thing that happened for the Seahawks......Cowboys with Demarco and Romo and Dez would've beat the Hawks at home ....no doubt....
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
The Hawks got lucky because if they would've faced the Cowboys I don't feel they would've beat them.......That call was the best thing that happened for the Seahawks......Cowboys with Demarco and Romo and Dez would've beat the Hawks at home ....no doubt....
Seriously...a team that beat them earlier in the year.....vs aaron Rodgers with one leg........Seahawks got fuking lucky.....they would've lost against the Cowboys...bottom line....anyone disagree??
0
Seriously...a team that beat them earlier in the year.....vs aaron Rodgers with one leg........Seahawks got fuking lucky.....they would've lost against the Cowboys...bottom line....anyone disagree??
I respectfully disagree, buddy. Before the Dez Bryant catch was reversed, I thought about unloading on the Seahawks as my biggest play of the season. Put in the revenge factor and that game would have gotten ugly from start to finish. Cowboys beat the Seahawks when the Hawks obviously had some major troubles. Cowboys have the worst defense of all playoff teams. Aaron Rodgers was completely out of rhythm and still torched them for 9.0 YPPA. Healthy Rodgers and the game would have ended in the third quarter. Fat Eddie ran all over them for 5.3 YPC. What would a healthy Russel Wilson and Marshawn Lynch have done with that defense on short fields ? Tony Romo was Tony person at some points of the game, Dallas would have gotten exposed by Seattle on every side of the ball. 35-13 type of game. With his arm, Rodgers can give the Seahawks a better game than Romo at THIS point of the season.
0
I respectfully disagree, buddy. Before the Dez Bryant catch was reversed, I thought about unloading on the Seahawks as my biggest play of the season. Put in the revenge factor and that game would have gotten ugly from start to finish. Cowboys beat the Seahawks when the Hawks obviously had some major troubles. Cowboys have the worst defense of all playoff teams. Aaron Rodgers was completely out of rhythm and still torched them for 9.0 YPPA. Healthy Rodgers and the game would have ended in the third quarter. Fat Eddie ran all over them for 5.3 YPC. What would a healthy Russel Wilson and Marshawn Lynch have done with that defense on short fields ? Tony Romo was Tony person at some points of the game, Dallas would have gotten exposed by Seattle on every side of the ball. 35-13 type of game. With his arm, Rodgers can give the Seahawks a better game than Romo at THIS point of the season.
12-13 since 2012, 4-4 this season. I'm not saying they are going to win at Seattle. I just believe they can give Seattle a better game than the Cowboys.
0
12-13 since 2012, 4-4 this season. I'm not saying they are going to win at Seattle. I just believe they can give Seattle a better game than the Cowboys.
Why would they be a nightmare matchup for Seattle ? They couldn't beat a top three defense (Detroit) at home without fourth down conversions and stupid referee calls, so why would they beat Seattle ? They got outplayed by an average of 96 total yards in both playoff games.
0
Why would they be a nightmare matchup for Seattle ? They couldn't beat a top three defense (Detroit) at home without fourth down conversions and stupid referee calls, so why would they beat Seattle ? They got outplayed by an average of 96 total yards in both playoff games.
That's why I said the Seahawks had major problems at the beginning of the season.
For example, prior to that game in week six, the Seahawks were #22 in passing offense, #29 in offensive fumbles, #16 in pass defense and #27 in defensive interceptions.
Now #14, #18, #3, #16. Completely different team now.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321:
Week 6...Dallas at Seattle 30-23....
That's why I said the Seahawks had major problems at the beginning of the season.
For example, prior to that game in week six, the Seahawks were #22 in passing offense, #29 in offensive fumbles, #16 in pass defense and #27 in defensive interceptions.
Now #14, #18, #3, #16. Completely different team now.
Yes for sure Dallas was the only team that would have a shot at Seattle .A win yesterday would of made them the Super Bowl winner And they had 2 calls against them that weren't correct . First was a catch made by Cobb where the ball skipped into his hand ,the replay showed,it hit the ground first ,then the catch ..I know the rule ,I just don't feel they followed it he made the catch took a step then on the second step tried to stretch over but they call he didnt I know the fans are all going crazy for and against the Cowboys but like the Ravens , if either of those 2 teams won or both they would have been in the Super Bowl As for the Colts ,Denver gave them that game ,choked again ,Im hoping Manning retires ,Tired of hearing his name .. Great weekend anyway all posted 9-3 on to next week .Ill be banging the Pats and Hawks soon as my lines are out . Fitting that NE losses to the new back to back Super Bowl winner Seattle Seahawks
0
Yes for sure Dallas was the only team that would have a shot at Seattle .A win yesterday would of made them the Super Bowl winner And they had 2 calls against them that weren't correct . First was a catch made by Cobb where the ball skipped into his hand ,the replay showed,it hit the ground first ,then the catch ..I know the rule ,I just don't feel they followed it he made the catch took a step then on the second step tried to stretch over but they call he didnt I know the fans are all going crazy for and against the Cowboys but like the Ravens , if either of those 2 teams won or both they would have been in the Super Bowl As for the Colts ,Denver gave them that game ,choked again ,Im hoping Manning retires ,Tired of hearing his name .. Great weekend anyway all posted 9-3 on to next week .Ill be banging the Pats and Hawks soon as my lines are out . Fitting that NE losses to the new back to back Super Bowl winner Seattle Seahawks
I respectfully disagree, buddy. Before the Dez Bryant catch was reversed, I thought about unloading on the Seahawks as my biggest play of the season. Put in the revenge factor and that game would have gotten ugly from start to finish. Cowboys beat the Seahawks when the Hawks obviously had some major troubles. Cowboys have the worst defense of all playoff teams. Aaron Rodgers was completely out of rhythm and still torched them for 9.0 YPPA. Healthy Rodgers and the game would have ended in the third quarter. Fat Eddie ran all over them for 5.3 YPC. What would a healthy Russel Wilson and Marshawn Lynch have done with that defense on short fields ? Tony Romo was Tony person at some points of the game, Dallas would have gotten exposed by Seattle on every side of the ball. 35-13 type of game. With his arm, Rodgers can give the Seahawks a better game than Romo at THIS point of the season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by suuma:
I respectfully disagree, buddy. Before the Dez Bryant catch was reversed, I thought about unloading on the Seahawks as my biggest play of the season. Put in the revenge factor and that game would have gotten ugly from start to finish. Cowboys beat the Seahawks when the Hawks obviously had some major troubles. Cowboys have the worst defense of all playoff teams. Aaron Rodgers was completely out of rhythm and still torched them for 9.0 YPPA. Healthy Rodgers and the game would have ended in the third quarter. Fat Eddie ran all over them for 5.3 YPC. What would a healthy Russel Wilson and Marshawn Lynch have done with that defense on short fields ? Tony Romo was Tony person at some points of the game, Dallas would have gotten exposed by Seattle on every side of the ball. 35-13 type of game. With his arm, Rodgers can give the Seahawks a better game than Romo at THIS point of the season.
Dallas 100% matches up better with hawks than packers. Seattle has small defensive front and that is why dallas literally destroyed seattle earlier In season. That final score was not indicative of how bad dallas beat them. Green bay plays right into Seattle strengths and add one leg rodgers pack have little chance. How do u beat fast small defensive front? U run it down their throat and set up Pass from that. Amazing how little football knowledge some People have
0
Dallas 100% matches up better with hawks than packers. Seattle has small defensive front and that is why dallas literally destroyed seattle earlier In season. That final score was not indicative of how bad dallas beat them. Green bay plays right into Seattle strengths and add one leg rodgers pack have little chance. How do u beat fast small defensive front? U run it down their throat and set up Pass from that. Amazing how little football knowledge some People have
Dallas 100% matches up better with hawks than packers. Seattle has small defensive front and that is why dallas literally destroyed seattle earlier In season. That final score was not indicative of how bad dallas beat them. Green bay plays right into Seattle strengths and add one leg rodgers pack have little chance. How do u beat fast small defensive front? U run it down their throat and set up Pass from that. Amazing how little football knowledge some People have
Exactly
0
Quote Originally Posted by KobezKing:
Dallas 100% matches up better with hawks than packers. Seattle has small defensive front and that is why dallas literally destroyed seattle earlier In season. That final score was not indicative of how bad dallas beat them. Green bay plays right into Seattle strengths and add one leg rodgers pack have little chance. How do u beat fast small defensive front? U run it down their throat and set up Pass from that. Amazing how little football knowledge some People have
Seriously...a team that beat them earlier in the year.....vs aaron Rodgers with one leg........Seahawks got fuking lucky.....they would've lost against the Cowboys...bottom line....anyone disagree??
Please dude. Get real. Go back and watch that game. If it wasn't for an unbelievable, lucky 3rd and 20 out of bound catch, the Cowgirls may have been on the ranch riding their cows week 16 already. I was actually rooting for Dal to win. I would unload all my winnings and more on next Sun game. Let me remind you that it is hard enough to beat a team 2x in the same season. Let alone beating the BEST defense at its dominant home....a nightmare homes for the NFL. And don't forget too Harvin and all his distractions was still here at the time. Since he's gone, they have refocus to what's they doing best....beast mode and smother defense. Seattle ALWAYS play much better in the 2nd half of the season as well as 2nd half of games. Therefore, not only do I want Dal to come here but I want Seattle to trail at halftime. So I can DOUBLE DOWN on the 2nd half line and come out a huge winner.
0
Quote Originally Posted by lmb4321:
Seriously...a team that beat them earlier in the year.....vs aaron Rodgers with one leg........Seahawks got fuking lucky.....they would've lost against the Cowboys...bottom line....anyone disagree??
Please dude. Get real. Go back and watch that game. If it wasn't for an unbelievable, lucky 3rd and 20 out of bound catch, the Cowgirls may have been on the ranch riding their cows week 16 already. I was actually rooting for Dal to win. I would unload all my winnings and more on next Sun game. Let me remind you that it is hard enough to beat a team 2x in the same season. Let alone beating the BEST defense at its dominant home....a nightmare homes for the NFL. And don't forget too Harvin and all his distractions was still here at the time. Since he's gone, they have refocus to what's they doing best....beast mode and smother defense. Seattle ALWAYS play much better in the 2nd half of the season as well as 2nd half of games. Therefore, not only do I want Dal to come here but I want Seattle to trail at halftime. So I can DOUBLE DOWN on the 2nd half line and come out a huge winner.
Please dude. Get real. Go back and watch that game. If it wasn't for an unbelievable, lucky 3rd and 20 out of bound catch, the Cowgirls may have been on the ranch riding their cows week 16 already. I was actually rooting for Dal to win. I would unload all my winnings and more on next Sun game. Let me remind you that it is hard enough to beat a team 2x in the same season. Let alone beating the BEST defense at its dominant home....a nightmare homes for the NFL. And don't forget too Harvin and all his distractions was still here at the time. Since he's gone, they have refocus to what's they doing best....beast mode and smother defense. Seattle ALWAYS play much better in the 2nd half of the season as well as 2nd half of games. Therefore, not only do I want Dal to come here but I want Seattle to trail at halftime. So I can DOUBLE DOWN on the 2nd half line and come out a huge winner.
Exactly my thinking about that possible matchup
0
Quote Originally Posted by seattleseahawks:
Please dude. Get real. Go back and watch that game. If it wasn't for an unbelievable, lucky 3rd and 20 out of bound catch, the Cowgirls may have been on the ranch riding their cows week 16 already. I was actually rooting for Dal to win. I would unload all my winnings and more on next Sun game. Let me remind you that it is hard enough to beat a team 2x in the same season. Let alone beating the BEST defense at its dominant home....a nightmare homes for the NFL. And don't forget too Harvin and all his distractions was still here at the time. Since he's gone, they have refocus to what's they doing best....beast mode and smother defense. Seattle ALWAYS play much better in the 2nd half of the season as well as 2nd half of games. Therefore, not only do I want Dal to come here but I want Seattle to trail at halftime. So I can DOUBLE DOWN on the 2nd half line and come out a huge winner.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
