By the way of course you should hedge Anytime you can eliminate a loss and only have to worry how much your going to win is a home run . Posts like Shangos show why people lose more than they should .I did it yesterday hedging my GB future that they will win the NFC . I did it with teasers and parlays buying the point at 6 ,when it was 7 with Ohio State last Monday .(All posted by the way _) And was told Im a pssy that I have no conviction all that baby crap .They were right about one thing I have no conviction for a certain team .,As a Jet fan my friends were all over me saying how are you betting so much money on the hated Pats .My answer is my loyalities are to wining money not on a team I like or hate .
Worry about your pocket my friend ,Nothing better than watching a game you have money on that you know you cant lose any of it.
Last year line opened at Hawks -1 and quickly went to Denver -3. Same outcome, different year.
at thinking Tom Brady is unbeatable.
No one is unbeatable and that goes for Seattle too .They should have lost yesterday . They played a dog crap game at home and were handed the win .
Because sharps bet on line value, a concept you seem to be having trouble with. If sharps like NE + the points with a healthy Sherman in you damn well better believe they will hammer pats + points with a chance of having him out. What injury concerns are there for the pats that you wouldn't hit pats now instead of waiting two weeks? You make no sense.
And then you proceed to tell people that they don't know about sharps while posting you bought a full point off a number that has been statistically proven to have a negative EV long term with. I'll clue you in...the only number that has a positive EV buying off of long term is 3.
And you show your lack of respect for other gamblers by implying they are betting pats because they have a man crush on Brady when in reality it is NE's defense that is going to be the problem for the hawks, not Brady.
And then you proceed to tell people that they don't know about sharps while posting you bought a full point off a number that has been statistically proven to have a negative EV long term with. I'll clue you in...the only number that has a positive EV buying off of long term is 3.
And you show your lack of respect for other gamblers by implying they are betting pats because they have a man crush on Brady when in reality it is NE's defense that is going to be the problem for the hawks, not Brady.
No one is unbeatable and that goes for Seattle too .They should have lost yesterday . They played a dog crap game at home and were handed the win .
Name the best defense the patriots faced this year.
Name the good games the Patriots played this year that weren't at home.
I'll wait.
The Patriots do nothing but run 3-4-5 yard outs to Edleman and Gronk on the seem route. I just don't know for the life of me how teams don't stop them. Not surprising the teams that do the best vs NE are in the division and know what they run. Give Carroll 2 weeks to prepare with the best secondary of the last 10 years and we will see what happens.
Because sharps bet on line value, a concept you seem to be having trouble with. If sharps like NE + the points with a healthy Sherman in you damn well better believe they will hammer pats + points with a chance of having him out. What injury concerns are there for the pats that you wouldn't hit pats now instead of waiting two weeks? You make no sense.
And then you proceed to tell people that they don't know about sharps while posting you bought a full point off a number that has been statistically proven to have a negative EV long term with. I'll clue you in...the only number that has a positive EV buying off of long term is 3.
And you show your lack of respect for other gamblers by implying they are betting pats because they have a man crush on Brady when in reality it is NE's defense that is going to be the problem for the hawks, not Brady.
Name the best defense the patriots faced this year.
Name the good games the Patriots played this year that weren't at home.
I'll wait.
The Patriots do nothing but run 3-4-5 yard outs to Edleman and Gronk on the seem route. I just don't know for the life of me how teams don't stop them. Not surprising the teams that do the best vs NE are in the division and know what they run. Give Carroll 2 weeks to prepare with the best secondary of the last 10 years and we will see what happens.
Other than Seattle is there really any good defense in the NFL ?
Buffalo and Detroit might be the best defenses the Pats played this year .
In my opinion any game a team wins on the road is a good game.
Beating Indy on the road was probably their best away game .
Other than Seattle is there really any good defense in the NFL ?
Buffalo and Detroit might be the best defenses the Pats played this year .
In my opinion any game a team wins on the road is a good game.
Beating Indy on the road was probably their best away game .
@logcottage: Stop deteriorating the thread because you're a clown. I'm sure you are a SAF and never had a typo with your 3-4 covers names. Here Mrs. Johnson, I'll use it in a sentence. The defensive player seemed confused by the seam route. Is that sentence correct? Or are you going to get your red pen out and correct it, and then call my mommy. Adding nothing to the site except being a grammar Nazi. Solid
Some people would disagree with that.
Very easy for me to be the bigger man in these situations. I have no interest in a back and forth on a gambling forum. Waste of my time. Goodluck with your life sir, you seem like an angry, bitterman. I'm sure you are a wonderful guy tho (though) with a great life and even better personality. 
Established in 1995,
Hot Forum Topics
