The NE defense is over rated.....I heard there team rank is around the mid 20's, giving up many yards between the red zones, but tough in the red zone...Their leading tacklers are their secondary folks...NE's defense better be ready for a track meet, especially if Atlanta picks up the tempo, which is where they feel more comfortable... One more thing during the NC game, all I heard was Alabama is unbeatable, and that they have the best defense ever...I am hearing that now about NE...How grateful NE, and Cry Brady are, and their defense is the NFL's best...REALLY...Let's see what happens when Atlanta goes to the no huddle offense, and goes off... WRONG team favored, and Eye of the Tiger...Atlanta wins. OutRight.
0
The NE defense is over rated.....I heard there team rank is around the mid 20's, giving up many yards between the red zones, but tough in the red zone...Their leading tacklers are their secondary folks...NE's defense better be ready for a track meet, especially if Atlanta picks up the tempo, which is where they feel more comfortable... One more thing during the NC game, all I heard was Alabama is unbeatable, and that they have the best defense ever...I am hearing that now about NE...How grateful NE, and Cry Brady are, and their defense is the NFL's best...REALLY...Let's see what happens when Atlanta goes to the no huddle offense, and goes off... WRONG team favored, and Eye of the Tiger...Atlanta wins. OutRight.
I am fading the public...Last week 70% of betters bet GB, and Pitt (LOSERS)...So far 70% betters have bet on NE which makes my ML bet look very good...GO FALCONS
0
I am fading the public...Last week 70% of betters bet GB, and Pitt (LOSERS)...So far 70% betters have bet on NE which makes my ML bet look very good...GO FALCONS
The NE defense is over rated.....I heard there team rank is around the mid 20's, giving up many yards between the red zones, but tough in the red zone...Their leading tacklers are their secondary folks...NE's defense better be ready for a track meet, especially if Atlanta picks up the tempo, which is where they feel more comfortable... One more thing during the NC game, all I heard was Alabama is unbeatable, and that they have the best defense ever...I am hearing that now about NE...How grateful NE, and Cry Brady are, and their defense is the NFL's best...REALLY...Let's see what happens when Atlanta goes to the no huddle offense, and goes off... WRONG team favored, and Eye of the Tiger...Atlanta wins. OutRight.
you are correct. That is all.
0
Quote Originally Posted by GordenGecko:
The NE defense is over rated.....I heard there team rank is around the mid 20's, giving up many yards between the red zones, but tough in the red zone...Their leading tacklers are their secondary folks...NE's defense better be ready for a track meet, especially if Atlanta picks up the tempo, which is where they feel more comfortable... One more thing during the NC game, all I heard was Alabama is unbeatable, and that they have the best defense ever...I am hearing that now about NE...How grateful NE, and Cry Brady are, and their defense is the NFL's best...REALLY...Let's see what happens when Atlanta goes to the no huddle offense, and goes off... WRONG team favored, and Eye of the Tiger...Atlanta wins. OutRight.
>>> a historic offense is overrated?! What?! You feeling ok?
You're a casual fan enamoured with offensive stats, without actually watching the games or looking deeper into their numbers. They've struggled against good, and even average, defenses. They are inconsistent on 3rd down and inside the red zone, especially against good, or even average, defenses.
Yes, that offense is very overrated, and no coaching staff in the league is better at exploiting weaknesses than Belichick's.
0
>>> a historic offense is overrated?! What?! You feeling ok?
You're a casual fan enamoured with offensive stats, without actually watching the games or looking deeper into their numbers. They've struggled against good, and even average, defenses. They are inconsistent on 3rd down and inside the red zone, especially against good, or even average, defenses.
Yes, that offense is very overrated, and no coaching staff in the league is better at exploiting weaknesses than Belichick's.
Why isn't the line moving if "sharps" are dropping huge money on Falcons? Truth is Sharps are waiting on +3.5 or -2.5 or value. They haven't weighed in.
0
Why isn't the line moving if "sharps" are dropping huge money on Falcons? Truth is Sharps are waiting on +3.5 or -2.5 or value. They haven't weighed in.
Why isn't the line moving if "sharps" are dropping huge money on Falcons? Truth is Sharps are waiting on +3.5 or -2.5 or value. They haven't weighed in.
Not the truth, unless they are banned from placing bets at Ti which has had -3½ ALL WEEK.
0
Quote Originally Posted by JackParkman:
Why isn't the line moving if "sharps" are dropping huge money on Falcons? Truth is Sharps are waiting on +3.5 or -2.5 or value. They haven't weighed in.
Not the truth, unless they are banned from placing bets at Ti which has had -3½ ALL WEEK.
Pats defense was never good this year. Stats skew what they really are.
You do understand that Pats can only play who NFL places on their schedule right? Pats typically playing with a lead so a ton of yards they give up are underneath with soft coverage in garbage time. Falcons are unbelievable and worthy of being in this spot but saying pats defense is overrated simply isn't true. Also, the NFC south has some of the worst defenses in the league, so by your own criteria Atlanta's offense must be overrated right? All 4 teams in NFC south ranked in bottom 15 in total defense.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Contrarian21:
Pats defense was never good this year. Stats skew what they really are.
You do understand that Pats can only play who NFL places on their schedule right? Pats typically playing with a lead so a ton of yards they give up are underneath with soft coverage in garbage time. Falcons are unbelievable and worthy of being in this spot but saying pats defense is overrated simply isn't true. Also, the NFC south has some of the worst defenses in the league, so by your own criteria Atlanta's offense must be overrated right? All 4 teams in NFC south ranked in bottom 15 in total defense.
Brownian, atlanta's offense is overrated? How many games in a row have they scored an opening drive td? 8? Did they lead the league in POINTS per game? Yep. I mean we keep hearing about new England's defense averaging 16 points against. What's different there. Points scored, points given up. If atlanta's offense is overrated then new England ms defense is overrated. As for not looking deeper into the numbers, what more do you want? Ever though that their 3rd down conversion rate during the REGULAR SEASON was a bit average because they aren't in 3rd downs as much as other teams? That can happen when you have a historic offense scoring points the way they do. How was the 3rd down rate against seattles defense in the playoffs? Atlanta, Only offensive line to have all starters start ALL 16 games. Efficiency wise, they are 6th in the league. They have the top TWO most efficient receivers in Gabriel and Jones (look it up), they have a running back who is the only guy to go for 1500 yards from scrimmage and score 11tds two years in a row. Ohhhhh, and Matt Ryan. He had a pretty good year too huh? HOW IS THE OFFENSE OF ATLANTA OVERRATED?! I've grown more and more impatient with some of the people in here and what they spit out.
0
Brownian, atlanta's offense is overrated? How many games in a row have they scored an opening drive td? 8? Did they lead the league in POINTS per game? Yep. I mean we keep hearing about new England's defense averaging 16 points against. What's different there. Points scored, points given up. If atlanta's offense is overrated then new England ms defense is overrated. As for not looking deeper into the numbers, what more do you want? Ever though that their 3rd down conversion rate during the REGULAR SEASON was a bit average because they aren't in 3rd downs as much as other teams? That can happen when you have a historic offense scoring points the way they do. How was the 3rd down rate against seattles defense in the playoffs? Atlanta, Only offensive line to have all starters start ALL 16 games. Efficiency wise, they are 6th in the league. They have the top TWO most efficient receivers in Gabriel and Jones (look it up), they have a running back who is the only guy to go for 1500 yards from scrimmage and score 11tds two years in a row. Ohhhhh, and Matt Ryan. He had a pretty good year too huh? HOW IS THE OFFENSE OF ATLANTA OVERRATED?! I've grown more and more impatient with some of the people in here and what they spit out.
Why isn't the line moving if "sharps" are dropping huge money on Falcons? Truth is Sharps are waiting on +3.5 or -2.5 or value. They haven't weighed in.
If there's one game on planet earth where "public" money can move a line, or keep it where it is even though more "sharp" money is on the other side, it's the SB..
Too much "sharp" money would come in at +3.5, don't see the books doing it..
And it's been a historically bad year for "sharps/professionals" anyway..
0
Quote Originally Posted by JackParkman:
Why isn't the line moving if "sharps" are dropping huge money on Falcons? Truth is Sharps are waiting on +3.5 or -2.5 or value. They haven't weighed in.
If there's one game on planet earth where "public" money can move a line, or keep it where it is even though more "sharp" money is on the other side, it's the SB..
Too much "sharp" money would come in at +3.5, don't see the books doing it..
And it's been a historically bad year for "sharps/professionals" anyway..
This is another tough SB I think,3 in a row actually. Does Atlanta have too many offensive for the Pats or is the Pat defense that good.
If Atlanta can hit Brady a bunch and rattle him they can win.
If the Pats slow down the Falcons they can win.
Sharps like the Falcons in this one and they are better than I am (Most people are)
I think the talent and hunger of the Falcons win this one.
Sharps like both sides, Sharps are also WRONG. PATS win, no question about it. Brady and pats hasve too much going better team, coach, QB, and motivation. Brady can be the first QB ever to win 5 super bowls, his family has had a tough year... I won't bet against brady. your playing with fire.
0
Quote Originally Posted by RayRayK:
This is another tough SB I think,3 in a row actually. Does Atlanta have too many offensive for the Pats or is the Pat defense that good.
If Atlanta can hit Brady a bunch and rattle him they can win.
If the Pats slow down the Falcons they can win.
Sharps like the Falcons in this one and they are better than I am (Most people are)
I think the talent and hunger of the Falcons win this one.
Sharps like both sides, Sharps are also WRONG. PATS win, no question about it. Brady and pats hasve too much going better team, coach, QB, and motivation. Brady can be the first QB ever to win 5 super bowls, his family has had a tough year... I won't bet against brady. your playing with fire.
That's enough with the "Sharps and Squares" talk. Let's just put it this way. The only difference between sharps and squares is that squares lose their money slower than squares. This rule applies to 99.9% of the betting world. 10 out of 1000 beat the odds and win in the long run. The rest of us (the 99.9%) are squares that lose a lot of money or sharps that lose their money stretched out over longer time periods.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
That's enough with the "Sharps and Squares" talk. Let's just put it this way. The only difference between sharps and squares is that squares lose their money slower than squares. This rule applies to 99.9% of the betting world. 10 out of 1000 beat the odds and win in the long run. The rest of us (the 99.9%) are squares that lose a lot of money or sharps that lose their money stretched out over longer time periods.
How does anyone know who is really bettin which side and for how much? or where the $$$$$ is really bet on.
Until you know that, your guess is as good as anyone else. Everthing is just conjecture/
And why now would the so called sharps divulge things now. Spill out on every fr**** game then
if you listen to bookmakers like Bob Scucci (behind the bets podcast) or Matt Holt (Pregame Monday podcasts), do you assume they are lying, or intentionally trying to fool the listeners, or that the "sharps/professional" bets vs the "over the counter/public" bets discussions that they have every week are completely meaningless??
0
Quote Originally Posted by press-it:
How does anyone know who is really bettin which side and for how much? or where the $$$$$ is really bet on.
Until you know that, your guess is as good as anyone else. Everthing is just conjecture/
And why now would the so called sharps divulge things now. Spill out on every fr**** game then
if you listen to bookmakers like Bob Scucci (behind the bets podcast) or Matt Holt (Pregame Monday podcasts), do you assume they are lying, or intentionally trying to fool the listeners, or that the "sharps/professional" bets vs the "over the counter/public" bets discussions that they have every week are completely meaningless??
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.