Should I let it ride with MIN -4 vs GB?

Question

I have a parlay ticket Pit&#x2B;Pit Over&#x2B;Min -4 that will pay 3000. What should I do?1. Let it ride on Min -42. Hedge out on GB &#x2B;4

nonames · Answer

I have a parlay ticket Pit&#x2B;Pit Over&#x2B;Min -4 that will pay 3000. What should I do?1. Let it ride on Min -42. Hedge out on GB &#x2B;4

tsw · Answer

Why did you put Minn in the parlay in the first place if you were going to consider hedging out of it anyway ?&#xD;&#xA; &#xD;&#xA;Should have just done the two teamer then.

nonames · Answer

Well I like Vikes but now I am thinking the Packers might actually have a shot at covering.

Gold_Rush · Answer

No brainerHedge it out you will thank yourself if it comes to thatnever be greedy,

Gold_Rush · Answer

consider buying a half point on GB

Bucci020 · Answer

i got a 3 teamer open with pitt and over too hahaim going with g baythen going gbay under teasegl tonite

bpulli · Answer

In my opinion, there is no question here. I would hedge the bet and take the for sure earn, always take the money when you can.

I would at a minimum hedge enough to cover your bet amount on the original play....but if it were my choice i would hedge the amount that would guarantee the largest return regardless of of the game outcome

arod1186 · Answer

Read vaznacks post on why hedging is always wrong, you should never be in a position to hedge (only parlay games being played at the same time). However if you must I would hedge with gb who is currently &#x2B;4.5 and hope it lands on 4 (a .5 middle isn&#x27;t much but its better than nothing). Really I would make it a 2 team teaser with gb and the under and you get gb at &#x2B;10.5 the only thing that fucks you is if the game goes over the teased number obviously but I think the under is a lock tonight, never mind adding another td. Minny/SF had 2 special teams/defensive td&#x27;s. Their other 2 opponents were clev and det. not exactly world beaters.

nerdburglar · Answer

I&#x27;m with what tsw said. you made the decision to let it ride when you included minny in the first place.

jeffrysox · Answer

hedge with gb ml and have your self a stressful night

50MissionCap · Answer

the largest return would be to try to middle it if your online book does inplay wagers. hedge if you want, but under the right conditions - like a viking lead ( ex 10-0), bet on gb then ( &#x2B;13) which gaurentees your original wager back, and a good chance at hitting both! ive hit it lots in hoops.

SportsGuruX · Answer

LET IT RIDE !AND THROW SOME MORE ON MINNESOTA

Qb4011 · Answer

whoever said hedge it by teasing, thats definately the dumbest, you could lose your original bet and more, if this is me im hedging youre gonna be dissappointed if you hedge and you didnt need to but your gonna be disgusted if you let it ride and lose...

tsw · Answer

Is it any wonder books and bookies make such huge amounts of cash ? It's free vig for them when all the thousands of suckers hedge parlays like this. This has nothing to do with this guy or this game, it's the overall principle of it. Surely there are many who are hedging out of their GB bets too. Some will wish they had, some they hadn't. But you should never be in that position to begin with, do the math !

50MissionCap · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by 50MissionCap]

the largest return would be to try to middle it if your online book does inplay wagers. hedge if you want, but under the right conditions - like a viking lead ( ex 10-0), bet on gb then ( +13) which gaurentees your original wager back, and a good chance at hitting both! ive hit it lots in hoops.

so whatdya decide? i had to come back to thread to congrat you on your parlay, amd if you insured it at halftime....21-14, you woulda middled your hedge to win em both

Should I let it ride with MIN -4 vs GB?

Hot Forum Topics