Lat week he picked texans19-17
new orleans 37-27
nyg 24-20
pitt 24-9
this week he has
no 23 - sf 19
n.e. 30 -denver 16
balt.30 -houston 20
g.b. 24 -nyg 23 ..ats last week if im correct was 1-3 ..might fade him this week ..g/l
Lat week he picked texans19-17
new orleans 37-27
nyg 24-20
pitt 24-9
this week he has
no 23 - sf 19
n.e. 30 -denver 16
balt.30 -houston 20
g.b. 24 -nyg 23 ..ats last week if im correct was 1-3 ..might fade him this week ..g/l
Lat week he picked texans19-17
new orleans 37-27
nyg 24-20
pitt 24-9
this week he has
no 23 - sf 19
n.e. 30 -denver 16
balt.30 -houston 20
g.b. 24 -nyg 23 ..ats last week if im correct was 1-3 ..might fade him this week ..g/l
Peter King is a knob. He's a glorified jock sniffer like Jay Glazer who thinks he's cool because he hangs out with plyaers. Neither has any good insight to the actual match-ups.
Peter King is a knob. He's a glorified jock sniffer like Jay Glazer who thinks he's cool because he hangs out with plyaers. Neither has any good insight to the actual match-ups.
Peter King is a knob. He's a glorified jock sniffer like Jay Glazer who thinks he's cool because he hangs out with plyaers. Neither has any good insight to the actual match-ups.
Peter King is a knob. He's a glorified jock sniffer like Jay Glazer who thinks he's cool because he hangs out with plyaers. Neither has any good insight to the actual match-ups.
DoubleUp
King, like many of the writers or commentators, just play off storylines and the entertainment aspect of the games. That is great, that is their role. But for people who "invest" on the games, their opinion is worthless. I want to hear from people who actually break down the games. King probably submits the scores with about 1% of thought into the actual matchup and 99% thought on the storyline, which is fine, that is his job. He's more wrapped up in the male soap opera than the actual games...
DoubleUp
King, like many of the writers or commentators, just play off storylines and the entertainment aspect of the games. That is great, that is their role. But for people who "invest" on the games, their opinion is worthless. I want to hear from people who actually break down the games. King probably submits the scores with about 1% of thought into the actual matchup and 99% thought on the storyline, which is fine, that is his job. He's more wrapped up in the male soap opera than the actual games...
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.